similar to: Is ALTREP "non-API"?

Hi Yutani, ALTREP is part of the official R api, as illustrated by the presence of src/include/R_ext/Altrep.h. Everything declared in the header files in that directory is official API AFAIK (and I believe that is more definitive than the manuals). The documentation of ALTREP has lagged behind its implementation unfortunately, which may partially my fault for not submitting doc patches for it

Thanks for your convincing comment, but it seems the R core team has a different opinion... A few hours ago, src/include/R_ext/Altrep.h got this comment: /* Not part of the API, subject to change at any time. */ commit: https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/commit/2059bffde642f8426d1f39ab5dd995d19a575d4d While I'm glad to see their attempt to make it clear, I'm confused. That

Thanks, Hernando, Sorry, "API" is a bit confusing term in this context, but what I want to discuss is the "API" that Writing R Extension defines as quoted in my previous email. It's probably different from an ordinary sense when we casually say "R C API". You might wonder why I care about such a difference. This is because calling a "non-API" is

Hello, I don't believe it is illegal, as ALTREP "implements an abstraction underneath the C API". And is "compatible with all code which uses the API". Please see slide deck by Gabriel Becker, with L Tierney, M Lawrence and T Kalibera. https://bioconductor.org/help/course-materials/2020/BiocDevelForum/16-ALTREP .pdf ALTREP framework implements an abstraction underneath

> On Apr 22, 2024, at 7:37 PM, Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Yutani, > > ALTREP is part of the official R api, as illustrated by the presence of > src/include/R_ext/Altrep.h. Everything declared in the header files in that > directory is official API AFAIK (and I believe that is more definitive than > the manuals). > That is not true

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:14?PM Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote: > > > > On Apr 22, 2024, at 7:37 PM, Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Yutani, > > > > ALTREP is part of the official R api, as illustrated by the presence of > > src/include/R_ext/Altrep.h. Everything declared in the header

Hi Tomas, There has been an R CMD check error with xfun and r-devel on Windows for a while: https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-windows-x86_64/xfun-00check.html Basically it means that the following would return TRUE before: normalizePath('a/b', mustWork = FALSE) == normalizePath('./a/b', mustWork = FALSE) but it became FALSE at some point in r-devel. I think

I confirmed the revert fixed my failing test. Thanks! 2023?2?23?(?) 20:12 Hiroaki Yutani <yutani.ini at gmail.com>: > Thanks for the prompt response, I'll confirm it after the new R-devel > binary is available. > Also, thanks for the detailed explanation. I agree with you in general. > > > "/" in "C:/" is a path separator or not, and whether it is

Thanks for the prompt response, I'll confirm it after the new R-devel binary is available. Also, thanks for the detailed explanation. I agree with you in general. > "/" in "C:/" is a path separator or not, and whether it is trailing or not It seems a Windows' path basically consists of two components; a drive specification (e.g., C:) and the directory structure

On 2/23/23 03:27, Hiroaki Yutani wrote: > Hi, > > I found dirname() behaves differently on R-devel on Windows. Since I'm not > sure which behavior is right, let me ask here before filing this to R's > Bigzilla. > > On R 4.2.2., we get > > > dirname("C:/") > [1] "C:/" > > However, on R-devel (r83888), we get > >

Hi, I found dirname() behaves differently on R-devel on Windows. Since I'm not sure which behavior is right, let me ask here before filing this to R's Bigzilla. On R 4.2.2., we get > dirname("C:/") [1] "C:/" However, on R-devel (r83888), we get > dirname("C:/") [1] "." ?dirname says 'dirname returns the part of the

Hi all, The coercion function defined for the ALTREP object will not be called by R when an assignment operation implicitly introduces coercion for a large ALTREP object. For example, If I create a vector of length 10, the ALTREP coercion function seems to work fine. ``` > x <- 1:10 > y <- wrap_altrep(x) > .Internal(inspect(y)) @0x000000001f9271c0 13 INTSXP g0c0 [REF(2)] I am

Hi all, I believe I have found a bug (or perhaps just an oversight) with the ALTREP wrapper classes. The short form of this is that I believe that the wrapper classes need to override the default ALTREP `Extract_subset_method()` with a method that calls `Extract_subset()` on the "wrapped" object. I have a patch prepared here: https://github.com/DavisVaughan/r-source/pull/1 There is

Hi Gabriel, here is a simple package for reproducing the problem. https://github.com/Jiefei-Wang/testPkg Best, Jiefei On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:04 AM Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote: > Jiefei, > > Where does the code for your altrep class live? > > Thanks, > ~G > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:25 AM Jiefei Wang <szwjf08 at gmail.com> wrote: >

Hi, By looking at a doc about ALTREP https://svn.r-project.org/R/branches/ALTREP/ALTREP.html (by the way congratulations for that and for R-3.5.0 in general), I was a little bit surprised by the following example: > x <- 1:1e10 > system.time(print(mean(x))) [1] 5e+09 ?? user? system elapsed ?38.520?? 0.008? 38.531 Taking 38.520 s to calculate a mean value of an arithmetic

Thank Denes for the clarification, glad to see my package got one citation from my own question:) Also, thank Benjamin for sending many useful documents. Actually, the question is related to the SharedObject package that Benjamin has pointed to. I wanna avoid sharing an object that has already been shared, so I need to check whether an object is an ALTREP that is defined in my package. Since the

Hello, I'm developing a package (lazyvec) that makes full use of the ALTREP framework (R >= 3.6.0). One application of the package is to wrap existing ALTREP vectors in a new ALTREP vector and pass all calls from R to the contained object. The purpose of this is to provide a diagnostic framework for working with ALTREP vectors and show information about internal calls. The package builds

Hi Gabriel, thanks for your detailed explanation, that definitely clarifies the design choices that were made in setting up the ALTREP framework and I can see how those choices make sure existing code won't break. My specific use-case for wanting to check whether a vector is an ALTREP is the following: the fst package wraps an external C++ library (fstlib, independent from R) that was made

I can work on this. Thanks Luke. ~G On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:25 AM Tierney, Luke <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: > If one of you wanted to try to create a patch to support ALTREP > generic vectors here are some notes: > > The main challenge I am aware of (there might be others): Allowing > DATAPTR to return a writable pointer would be too dangerous because > the GC

thanks for clearing that up, so these methods are actually not meant to be exported on Windows and OSX? Some of the ALTREP methods that now use 'attribute_hidden' would be very useful to packages that aim to be ALTREP aware, should the currently (exported) API be considered final? thanks for your time & best, Mark On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:52 PM Tierney, Luke <luke-tierney at