similar to: ZFS deadlock

I gave the AMD64 version of 7.2 RC2 a spin and all installed as expected off the dvd INTEL S3200SHV MB, Core2Duo, 4G of RAM In the past it had been suggested that for zfs tuning, something like vm.kmem_size_max="1073741824" vm.kmem_size="1073741824" vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1 However doing a simple test with bonnie and dd, there does not seem to be very much difference in

We have a 32 GB RAM server running about 14 zones. There are multiple databases, application servers, web servers, and ftp servers running in the various zones. I understand that using ZFS will increase kernel memory usage, however I am a bit concerned at this point. root at servername:~/zonecfg #mdb -k Loading modules: [ unix krtld genunix specfs dtrace uppc pcplusmp ufs md mpt ip indmux ptm

Would someone "in the know" be willing to write up (preferably blog) definitive definitions/explanations of all the arcstats provided via kstat? I''m struggling with proper interpretation of certain values, namely "p", "memory_throttle_count", and the mru/mfu+ghost hit vs demand/prefetch hit counters. I think I''ve got it figured out, but

Since last upgrade, I see much more CPU time "eated" by interrupts (at least 10% cpu in top) (see http://dgeo.perso.ec-marseille.fr/cpu-week.png) The server behave correctly (Or seems to?), and high interrupt number seems to come from bce cards (source: systat -vmstat) I just upgraded from "RELENG_7 Mon Sep 8 12:33:06 CEST 2008" to "RELENG_7_1 Sat Nov 29 16:20:35 CET

On 16 May 2015, at 09:39, Xin Li <delphij at delphij.net> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi, > > On 5/15/15 10:58, Xin Li wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have seen the following assertion fails on my own mail server >> (indexer-worker): >> >> Panic: file charset-iconv.c: line 132 (charset_to_utf8):

Hi: We have a machine running 6.2-R-p10 and squid 2.6.17, and upgrade it to 6.3R yesterday, but squid will hang and eat 100% cpu time after restart about 1 hour later, machine still alive, and no response from squid. downgrade to 6.2-R-p10, everything ok again.. here is some infomations: machine type: FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE #0: Wed Jan 23 01:58:39 CST 2008 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz

Hi, Any info on this subject on http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/14/freebsd_security_bug/ -- Frederique

Hi, After changing cables,switches,ports, I came to the conclusion that bce is reporting input errors that are not there, or creating them. I checked this with 3 different boxes, all Dell-2950/Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2), and one of them, while running Solaris, reported 0 errors after a week, and freebsd after a few minutes its count was > 100. The errors appear under

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, A feature of Cyrus-IMAPd I really missed after migrated to Dovecot is their optional "duplicate suppression", which eliminates duplicate message at deliver time, if their envelope sender, recipient and message-id matches. For example, if one subscribes to a mailing list, and someone hit "Reply All" to reply to him, there

Hi all, I have exchanged my Dell R610 in favor of a Sun Fire 4170 M2 which has 32 GB RAM installed. I am running Sol11Expr on this host and I use it to primarily serve Netatalk AFP shares. From day one, I have noticed that the amount of free RAM decereased and along with that decrease the overall performance of ZFS decreased as well. Now, since I am still quite a Solaris newbie, I seem to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have put together a preliminary patchset for dovecot 1.1 at: http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/dovecot-1.1-rc4.diff My intention is to repocopy the current dovecot port to dovecot11 and make changes on the latter. In this version of patchset, I have intentionally removed the following chunk of change which by default allows gid=0

I would appreciate if somebody can clarify a few points. I am doing some random WRITES (100% writes, 100% random) testing and observe that ARC grows way beyond the "hard" limit during the test. The hard limit is set 512 MB via /etc/system and I see the size going up to 1 GB - how come is it happening? mdb''s ::memstat reports 1.5 GB used - does this include ARC as well or is

Hi all, I'm testing Dovecot version 1.2.17 on FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE using ZFS as filesystem. Searching on google I've ridden about some problem concerning indexes and mmap. I wold like to know if this problem persists on the latest releases. Thanks in advance. Roberto Giuliani.

Dear folks, It seems that doing bind() inside a jail (whose IP address is an outside address), will result in some wierd behavior, that the actual bind is done on the outside address. For example, binding to 127.0.0.1:6666 inside a jail addressed 192.168.1.1, will finally result in a bind to 192.168.1.1:6666. With this in mind, it is possible that some formerly secure configuration fail in jail

Hello! I'm facing ReInvites as caller from UAS despite configured session-timers=refuse (which can be seen in the SIP trace) always after 900s. (The behavior is the same if session-timers is set to accept). This just happens with one provider (German Telekom to callee at kabelbw). - The incoming ReInvite is answered immediately by asterisk (Status 100 / Status 200 - 0.02s). Media stream

Hi folks, While investigating OpenBSD's cron implementation, I found that they set the systemwide crontab (a.k.a. /etc/crontab) to be readable by the superuser only. The attached patch will bring this to FreeBSD by moving crontab out from BIN1 group and install it along with master.passwd. This change should not affect the current cron(1) behavior. Cheers, -- Xin LI <delphij frontfree

Hi there, I'm following the security advisory to patch the cpio vulnerability (update to 6_0_0 RELENG p2, make obj, make depend), yet when it comes to make, it shows some error message as follows: /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cpio/../../../contrib/cpio/copyin.c:536: error: redefinition of 'safer_name_suffix' /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cpio/../../../contrib/cpio/copyin.c:488: error: previous

Hi All, First time poster to this group, please ignore my ignorance? I?m trying to use Opus 1.1 on a 400MHz MIPS 24k CPU (AR9331, specifically, like in the Arduino Yun). I?ve successfully built (I think) opus-1.1 and opus-tools-1.8 and they run, but are dog slow. opus-1.1 does have the ?enable-fixed-point option set, as this chip only has soft-float. My short test file (less than one

Hi, Just want to ask about the status of this:- http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0002 >From list archives I gather the fix is still under refinement (but committed (and removed?) in HEAD and RELENG_5_2). One paranoid little shop is running a public web server on RELENG_4_9, and contemplating this patch:-

On 05/22/15 13:18, Cassidy Larson wrote: > We're using FreeBSD 10.1 I see. Yes that's the same problem I have seen. There is a behavioral difference (I think it's a FreeBSD bug) between FreeBSD's iconv(3) and GNU implementation, and there is arguably a bug with Dovecot that iconv(3) state should be reset for each multipart part. The two together would trigger the problem