similar to: [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #24 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> --- On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000 samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- > Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement > request myself, I found everything

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #25 from Andrey Gursky <andrey.gursky at e-mail.ua> --- On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000 samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- > Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request > myself, I found

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Additional Comments From blackb1rd@seat-ibiza.nl 2005-02-11 01:58 ------- I totally agree this one. With this enhancement there would be no longer unnecessary traffic when some user has moved / copy'ed a large directory (which is really annoying). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request myself, I found everything here and basically have the same use case. My version is that I am creating a regular backup of logs from many servers' services onto a single box, and doing so with rsync. Some of those services

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 boris@folgmann.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |boris@folgmann.de ------- Comment #6 from boris@folgmann.de 2007-07-11 09:50 CST ------- I'm using rsync 2.6.9 to archive rotated

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 Summary: Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Comment #8 from bill+samba@bfccomputing.com 2008-11-30 17:24 CST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks. This will be especially useful for log directories where logrotate is > incrementing the filename number at each rotation period (httpd.10.gz -> > httpd.11.gz). Since I mentioned this specific use case, I should

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #20 from kevin.layer at gmail.com 2014-03-02 03:08:37 UTC --- I've been playing with the --detect-renamed patch https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=detect-renamed.diff;h=c3e6e846eab437e56e25e2c334e292996ee84345;hb=master I can't get seem it to work. Does it rely on other patches? Anyway, in a simple test, using

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #26 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- ### What's the diff between --fuzzy and --detect-renamed ? If I understand correctly, --fuzzy looks only in destination folder, for either a file that has an identical size and modified-time, or a similarly-named file, and uses it as a basis file. Whereas --detect-renamed looks

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #27 from Wolfgang Hamann <wolfgang at maas-noten.de> --- Hi, I recently ran into the problem that a large file set got renamed and then re-sent. I tried to fix after the fact, so I went the obvious way of comparing sizes and modtimes on the destination and calculate checksums for potential matches. I would have preferred to use a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #40 from roland <devzero at web.de> --- > This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync. sorry, but this comment is totally nonsense, as btrfs and zfs are filesystems (i.e. places to store data) whereas rsync is a tool to sync data from one place to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #22 from elatllat at gmail.com --- Wow 10 years. Maybe one reason this has not been implemented is there are other options. For example I have been using a shell script as a wrapper to reduce the iteration of this bug, here is how it works: 1) Create 2 lists of files; destination and source with the files sizes and path 2) For each file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #39 from andy <andy at digitalsignalperson.com> --- > This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync. Funny I am doing exactly this, but I came to rsync looking for a backup for when ZFS fails. Many consider zfs/btrfs/snapshots as "not a backup".

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Comment #12 from phr-samba at nightsong.com 2011-01-28 20:38 CST ------- Hi, I was about to enter a similar suggestion to this. My very frequent use case is moving files from one directory to another. In that situation the file name does not change--just the directory path leading to it. These are often quite large files (0.2 to

Hello, I have recently upgraded from an older version of OpenSSH to the newer 3.3p1 (first) and now to 3.4p1 - because of the discovered vulnerabilities. The default setting for these versions is to use privilege separation, and this seems to trigger some weird bug with my systems, causing sshd to consume memory until it barfs. Details: 1. OpenSSH 3.3p1, privsep on, compression on:

Hi I'm computing the correlation between two time-series x_t and y_t-1 (time-series lagged using the lag(y,-1) function) using the cor() function and the returned value is different from the value of ccf() function at the same lag. Any ideas why this is so? Thanks in advance for any hints. Mihnea [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Signed-off-by: Mihnea Dobrescu-Balaur <mihneadb at gmail.com> --- drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c index c3dae2e..9620644 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c @@ -1203,11 +1203,10 @@ static int blkif_recover(struct

Signed-off-by: Mihnea Dobrescu-Balaur <mihneadb at gmail.com> --- drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c index c3dae2e..9620644 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c @@ -1203,11 +1203,10 @@ static int blkif_recover(struct

Dear friends, I've installed Outlook from MS Office 97 Professional and I've made various hacks both in Wine windows environment (a.k.a. /usr/share/wine-c) and real Win2K environment (in /mnt/windows) and all seems to fail and MS Exchange Service module. This modules is served by following DLL's: emsabp32.dll emsmdb32.dll emsui32.dll At first running Outlook prompt me to

Dear friends, I managed to run Outlook to the point where it just want to resolve the Exchange server name into IP. To hack it, I used native Windows DLL's. Along the mapi*.dll one, I setup as native "rpcrt" = "native" "rpcrt4" = "native" My first clue when Outlook freezed was to put mpr.dll, as native, but I pointed, that, even Outlook cannot