similar to: [PATCH] nouveau/gsp: Avoid addressing beyond end of rpc->entries

Add the NVreg_RegistryDwords command line parameter, which allows specifying additional registry keys to be sent to GSP-RM. This allows additional configuration, debugging, and experimentation with GSP-RM, which uses these keys to alter its behavior. Note that these keys are passed as-is to GSP-RM, and Nouveau does not parse them. This is in contrast to the Nvidia driver, which may parse some

Add the NVreg_RegistryDwords command line parameter, which allows specifying additional registry keys to be sent to GSP-RM. This allows additional configuration, debugging, and experimentation with GSP-RM, which uses these keys to alter its behavior. Note that these keys are passed as-is to GSP-RM, and Nouveau does not parse them. This is in contrast to the Nvidia driver, which may parse some

From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> Timur pointed this out before, and it just slipped my mind, but this might help some things work better, around pcie power management. Fixes: 8d55b0a940bb ("nouveau/gsp: add some basic registry entries.") Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

Hi Gustavo, On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:11:43PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Fake flexible arrays (zero-length and one-element arrays) are deprecated, > and should be replaced by flexible-array members. So, replace > zero-length array with a flexible-array member in `struct > PACKED_REGISTRY_TABLE`. > > Also annotate array `entries` with `__counted_by()` to prepare for

Fake flexible arrays (zero-length and one-element arrays) are deprecated, and should be replaced by flexible-array members. So, replace zero-length array with a flexible-array member in `struct PACKED_REGISTRY_TABLE`. Also annotate array `entries` with `__counted_by()` to prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the `__counted_by` attribute. Flexible array members annotated with

Hello Ben Skeggs, The patch 176fdcbddfd2: "drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: add support for booting GSP-RM" from Sep 19, 2023 (linux-next), leads to the following Smatch static checker warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:1016 r535_gsp_rpc_unloading_guest_driver() warn: 'rpc' isn't an ERR_PTR drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c 1010 static int

No functional modification involved. drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:2174: warning: expecting prototype for create_debufgs(). Prototype was for create_debugfs() instead. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci at linux.alibaba.com> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=12292 Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong at linux.alibaba.com> ---

The r535_gsp_cmdq_get() function returns error pointers but this code checks for NULL. Also we need to propagate the error pointer back to the callers in r535_gsp_rpc_get(). Returning NULL will lead to a NULL pointer dereference. Fixes: 176fdcbddfd2 ("drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: add support for booting GSP-RM") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at linaro.org> ---

Hi Zhi, On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:52:36AM -0700, Zhi Wang wrote: > In order to explain the name clean-ups in GSP RPC routines, a kernel > doc to explain the memory layout and terms is required. > > Add a kernel doc to introduce the GSP RPC. Thanks for adding this -- very much appreciated! > > Signed-off-by: Zhi Wang <zhiw at nvidia.com> > --- >

This should let the upper layers retry as needed on EAGAIN. There may be other values we will care about in the future, but this covers our present needs. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 26 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c

From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> These can happen in normal operations esp with auxch transactions. Gets rid of nouveau 0000:01:00.0: gsp: cli:0xc1d00002 obj:0x00730000 ctrl cmd:0x00731341 failed: 0x0000ffff in logs. Cc: Lyude <lyude at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 2 +- 1 file

These seem to get called, but it doesn't look like we have to care too much at this point. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c index

On 11/7/23 20:00, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On 11/7/23 15:34, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> Hello Ben Skeggs, >> >> The patch 176fdcbddfd2: "drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: add support for >> booting GSP-RM" from Sep 19, 2023 (linux-next), leads to the >> following Smatch static checker warning: >> >> ????drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:1016

Add NULL callbacks for some things GSP calls that we don't handle, but know about so we avoid the logging. v2: Timur suggested allowing null fn. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c

On 11/7/23 15:34, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Hello Ben Skeggs, > > The patch 176fdcbddfd2: "drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: add support for > booting GSP-RM" from Sep 19, 2023 (linux-next), leads to the > following Smatch static checker warning: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:1016 r535_gsp_rpc_unloading_guest_driver() > warn: 'rpc' isn't an

These were leftover debug, if we need to bring them back do so for debugging later. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 9 --------- 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c index 6c0a8fbf0061..1dba7c49bd9a 100644 ---

From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> These WARN_ONs seem to trigger a lot, and we don't seem to have a plan to fix them, so just drop them, as they are most likely harmless. Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:52:37AM -0700, Zhi Wang wrote: > The name "repc" has different meanings in different contexts. > > To improve the readability, it's better to refine it to a name that > reflects what it actually represents. > > Rename "repc" to "gsp_rpc_len" in the GSP message recv path. Add an > section in the doc to explain the

On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 13:57 +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > Thanks for sending a new version of the patch. > > Please make sure that for future patches you include a changelog, such that > it's easier for reviewers to keep track of what has changed. Will do. > > .../gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h | 6 + > >

From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> The upper layer transfer functions expect EBUSY as a return for when retries should be done. Fix the AUX error translation, but also check for both errors in a few places. Fixes: eb284f4b3781 ("drm/nouveau/dp: Honor GSP link training retry timeouts") Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> ---