similar to: SaMBa functional level

On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 12:18 +0100, Pisch Tam?s wrote: > > Others have integrated Azure AD with Samba without the FL increase, > > and > > the key step would be the adprep work, > > Then I will do it without increasing the FL. What do I have to do > with adprep? To (prepare to) raise the domain functional level of an existing domain, after updating the smb.conf and

> >> Current plan : add a third DC, make dc2 a dm file server. Best solution > > imo. > > Yes, I know that it would be better to use a separate dc, but I didn't > > want it on that site. > Hi Pisch, that wasn't aimed at you, but it does show why you should > never hijack an existing thread, my fault for not forking it off into a > new thread, sorry ;-)

On 09/08/2019 10:33, Pisch Tam?s via samba wrote: >> You have to give any users you require visible on Unix a uidNumber attribute > Ok, I can do it with samba-tool user edit... >> You have to give 'Domain Users' a gidNumber attribute. >> You have to give any group you require to be visible a gidNumber > I know that I can set gidNumber when I create a group, but how

Hello all, Does Samba properly support 2012_R2 domains? If so, what is the earliest version of Samba AD that supports it? I see that the most recent versions support ad dc functional level = 2012_R2 in smb.conf but I am unsure if I can safely run 2012_R2 functional level on older versions of Samba. A little background: In my test environment I setup a Samba 4.20 AD Domain Controller with

Hello Marc, thank you for your answer. I already added gidNumber 513 for the group. Now I added the two additional attribute for the group. I installed RSAT, and enabled the necessary modules according to the Samba wiki. I opened AD users and computers, and Domain Users' properties. When I click on the UNIX Attributes tab, I get an error: Execution denied. On the panel I see: NIS Domain: xxx;

Pisch Tam?s <pischta at gmail.com> ezt ?rta (id?pont: 2019. j?l. 4., Cs, 13:15): > > >OK, I set up Buster RC3 in a VM > Thanks a lot! > > >I could add 'Domain Admins' to the 'Properties' on the share without any > >problem. > :o > > > Back to Buster machine: > > root at dbrc3:~# ls -lad /home/users > > drwxrwx---+ 2 root

Yes I've red this section and the docu is saying no FL above 2008. Might be caused by incompleted docu? So far I understand if we don't use >4.19 we will not be able to use FL 2016 which is necessary since our DC WIN22 is configured as FL2016? On 18.10.23 19:10, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > If you take a look at: > >

I have a script which carefully manages uidNumber and gidNumber attributes for users and groups. We just recently put it into production. I plan to release it as open source software soon -- and get Rowland's blessing :-) On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 3:42 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 21/06/2019 07:49, Pisch Tam?s via samba wrote: > > Hi, >

If you take a look at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows_2012_Server_compatibility You will find your error message. I think your domain is running with FL 2012 and you are using a samba version < 4.19. So you can only go up to FL 2008_R2. The new 4.19 is the first version supporting FL >2008_R2. There you can go up to FL 2016. Am 18.10.23 um 18:05 schrieb matti.kaupenjohann

Am 18.10.23 um 23:27 schrieb Matti Kaupenjohann via samba: > Yes I've red this section and the docu is saying no FL above 2008. Might > be caused by incompleted docu? So far I understand if we don't use >4.19 > we will not be able to use FL 2016 which is necessary since our DC WIN22 > is configured as FL2016? Yes you MUST usee 4.19 ;-) > > On 18.10.23 19:10,

Hi all, I''ve noticed that facter version superior from epel do not display lsbmajdistrelease fact: # facter lsbmajdistrelease 5 # rpm -qa|grep facter facter-1.5.5-1.el5 # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga) # facter lsbmajdistrelease # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga) # rpm -qa|grep facter

So. I've builded 4.19.2 from source. building worked fine and I've configured like the following: ./configure \ ?? ?--sbindir=/usr/local/sbin \ ?? ?--bindir=/usr/local/bin \ ?? ?--sysconfdir=/etc/samba \ ?? ?--mandir=/usr/share/man \ ?? ?--systemd-install-services \ ?? ?--with-systemddir=/lib/systemd/system \ ?? ?--enable-selftest \ ?? ?--disable-cups I ran make quicktest with

Hi folks, I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports for Bookworm? I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a while ago, that there probably wont be a Samba 4.18 for Debian Bullseye. I also saw another post about

On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,

Hi Peter, Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: > Hi folks, > > I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be > the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. > Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports > for Bookworm? > > I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a

On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba

On 09/08/2019 18:13, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 09.08.19 um 12:49 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 09/08/2019 10:33, Pisch Tam?s via samba wrote: >>>> You have to give any users you require visible on Unix a uidNumber >>>> attribute >>> Ok, I can do it with samba-tool user edit... > I think my rsnapshot-issue corresponds with this

> >>>> Run this : getfacl /home/users > >>> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > >>> # file: home/users > >>> # owner: root > >>> # group: A\\domain\040admins > >>> user::rwx > >>> user:root:rwx > >>> user:10512:rwx > >>> group::rwx > >>>

I was playing around again with Windows and when you add members to silos, or remove them, it should not set/unset assigned silo on the user. So I've got a new pull request in Draft state still where I remove that functionality, as well as add some new commands to samba-tool user command. It turned out to be easier to add sub commands to user, as edit user wasn't quite what I thought

You'll get problems with file permissions. I've learned that you won't be able to just give a user access to a file without also giving him read access to every folder, down from the root of the share, that the file is located in. Example: You can't give accounting access to \\samba\IT\management\budget.ods without also giving them rights to \\samba\IT and \\samba\IT\management.