similar to: Raise Domain Level, Forest Level and Schema for Bitlocker integration

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Raise Domain Level, Forest Level and Schema for Bitlocker integration"

2024 Mar 20
3
Raise Domain Level, Forest Level and Schema for Bitlocker integration
On 18/03/2024 15:44, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote: > > I would like to add BitLocker integration to the three DCs we have running 4.15.13 on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. > > The DC has been around a while and is currently on Schema version 47 and Domain level 2008_R2. > > Can I confirm that the procedure to upgrade the three DCs is as follows:- > > 1) backup > 2) upgrade
2024 Mar 22
2
Raise Domain Level, Forest Level and Schema for Bitlocker integration
Not sure what Bitlocker integration you are referring to. Saving bitlocker recovery keys does work for me with schema version 47. Regards, Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Paul Littlefield via samba Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. M?rz 2024 18:14 An: samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] Raise Domain Level, Forest Level
2024 Mar 20
1
Raise Domain Level, Forest Level and Schema for Bitlocker integration
On 20-03-2024 18:14, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote: > On 18/03/2024 15:44, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote: >> >> I would like to add BitLocker integration to the three DCs we have >> running 4.15.13 on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. >> >> The DC has been around a while and is currently on Schema version 47 >> and Domain level 2008_R2. >> >> Can I
2024 Aug 20
1
Can't join new samba dc to existing dc
Pada Sen, 19 Agu 2024 pukul 16.36 Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> menulis: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:40:15 +0700 > fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for your response ? > > > > If I succesfully upgrade DC4 (the karoshi samba package) to samba > > 4.20, is there any
2024 Mar 24
1
Raise Domain Level, Forest Level and Schema for Bitlocker integration
On 22/03/2024 09:20, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: > Not sure what Bitlocker integration you are referring to. Saving > bitlocker recovery keys does work for me with schema version 47. > Regards, Joachim We have tried a few times to use our existing schema version 47 and it's coming up with this error:- https://www.itdroplets.com/bitlocker-error-0x80005000/ A screenshot is
2019 May 01
2
Replication failures
Hai Mason,   I had a look at the debug output.   on 1) why around 15-16 second, that i really dont know. im trying to figure that out. on 2) if DNS is inconsistance, that everything is unrelayable. This is really the first the that needs fixing. then we look again at the replication.   The debug output still shows several messages about zones in flat files. I still do believe also that this
2016 Feb 25
4
Desynced DC
Yes they are, see samba-tool drs replicate -h. Am 24.02.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Achim Gottinger: > Have you tried to replicate with the --sync-forced and --full-sync > options? > > Am 24.02.2016 um 14:31 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: >> Hi list, >> >> We use samba 4.1.17 (debian's version) on several DCs. I just >> realized that one of them is desynced and
2016 Feb 24
5
Desynced DC
Hi list, We use samba 4.1.17 (debian's version) on several DCs. I just realized that one of them is desynced and cannot get it to resync. The long story: we got 5 DCs splitted over several sites. Recently we had to replace one of them (let's call him DC5). Since both had to run in parallel for data recovery/users work we decided to join a brand new DC (DC6) and latter demote the
2016 Feb 24
0
Desynced DC
Have you tried to replicate with the --sync-forced and --full-sync options? Am 24.02.2016 um 14:31 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: > Hi list, > > We use samba 4.1.17 (debian's version) on several DCs. I just realized > that one of them is desynced and cannot get it to resync. > > The long story: we got 5 DCs splitted over several sites. Recently we > had to replace one of
2016 Feb 25
0
Desynced DC
I'd try to rejoin the faulty DC instead of copying sam.ldb files. I guess there are unique DC specific entries in the local database. Can be samba-tool replicate works if you try the push the settings from an other dc or pull em on the faulty dc. What command did you try andn on what dc? Am 25.02.2016 um 14:02 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: > Still the same error… > > ERROR(<class
2016 Feb 25
0
Desynced DC [SOLVED]
Hi again, The --local option did the trick. But I can see why samba-tool drs replicate desynced-dc.my.domain sane-dc.my-domain dc=ad,dc=my,dc=domain fails while samba-tool drs replicate desynced-dc.my.domain sane-dc.my-domain dc=ad,dc=my,dc=domain --local works like a charm (desynced-dc.ad.finsecur.lan resolves correctly) Anyway, sync seem to be up & running again, thank you very much Le
2024 Aug 19
1
Can't join new samba dc to existing dc
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:40:15 +0700 fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > Thanks for your response ? > > If I succesfully upgrade DC4 (the karoshi samba package) to samba > 4.20, is there any posibilities that i can join the new samba machine > (DC6) to the DC4 ? Possibly, try it. > If I rebuild new machine, what data will be lost
2024 Aug 18
1
Can't join new samba dc to existing dc
Pada Min, 18 Agu 2024 pukul 16.38 Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> menulis: > On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:21:14 +0700 > fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for your response > > > > Is it ok to have 2 records on the > > >
2018 Nov 21
0
Samba4 multiple DCs replication
Le 19/11/2018 à 15:00, Julien TEHERY via samba a écrit : > Le 19/11/2018 à 12:33, Julien TEHERY via samba a écrit : >> Le 19/11/2018 à 11:14, Marco Gaiarin via samba a écrit : >>> Mandi! Julien TEHERY via samba >>>    In chel di` si favelave... >>> >>>> Is there a good pratice when adding new remote DCs in terms of >>>> replication
2018 Nov 21
2
Samba4 multiple DCs replication
Cordialement, Doe Corp <https://www.openevents.fr/> <https://www.facebook.com/OPENevents-172305449504004/> <https://twitter.com/SocOPENevents> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/openevents/> Julien Téhéry Ingénieur Systèmes & Réseaux | OPENevents 15 avenue de l'Europe 86170 Neuville de Poitou phone : +33 5 49 62 26 03 <tel:+33549622603> mail :
2020 Aug 07
0
BitLocker integration with AD
On 07/08/2020 15:05, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote: > Hi, > > What do I need to get BitLocker integration with AD on Samba 4? > > Paul > Never tried it, but Tranquil IT has a webpage about this: https://dev.tranquil.it/samba/en/samba_advanced_methods/samba_bitlocker_ad.html Perhaps that will help ? Rowland
2024 Aug 19
1
Can't join new samba dc to existing dc
Pada Min, 18 Agu 2024 pukul 23.23 Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> menulis: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:21:02 +0700 > fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > it at dc4:~$ sudo dpkg -l | grep -E > > 'samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient|acl|attr|bind9' > > ii acl
2024 Aug 18
1
Can't join new samba dc to existing dc
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:21:02 +0700 fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > it at dc4:~$ sudo dpkg -l | grep -E > 'samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient|acl|attr|bind9' > ii acl 2.2.53-6 > > amd64 access control > list - utilities > ii attr
2015 Dec 23
2
samba4 windows 10 pro bitlocker key managment
hi did anyone successfully implemented bitlocker key management in samba4 ad? searching web i can find one hit on this http://kidcartouche.blogspot.com/2013/03/bitlocker-drive-encryption-and-samba4.html i'm on 4.3.3. do i still need to import the bitlocker schema? any info on the subject is appreciated. thanks -- View this message in context:
2020 Oct 12
0
Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Windows BitLocker support.
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 04:33:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 05:02:57PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> Basically what I did was create a small disk, create one partition >> over the whole disk, then cryptsetup luksFormat the partition, open >> it and format it with a filesystem (without any LVM). That is one >> of the things you were