similar to: [PATCH] therm.c: Adding an array index check before accessing an element.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[PATCH] therm.c: Adding an array index check before accessing an element."

2013 Sep 04
0
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/bios/therm: handle vbioses with duplicate entries (mostly nva5)
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote: > From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> > > Some vbioses have extra useless entries after "the end" of the table. This is > problematic since all of the vbios I found with this issue redefine the > pwm freq divider to insane levels (52750 Hz instead of 2500), thus breaking
2013 Aug 30
5
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/bios/therm: handle vbioses with duplicate entries (mostly nva5)
From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> Some vbioses have extra useless entries after "the end" of the table. This is problematic since all of the vbios I found with this issue redefine the pwm freq divider to insane levels (52750 Hz instead of 2500), thus breaking fan management. The first solution to solve this mess would be to change the length of the table. The solution
2017 Sep 15
0
[RFC PATCH 01/29] therm: split return code and value in nvkm_get_temp
The current hwmon code doesn't check if the returned value was actually an error. Since Kepler temperature sensors are able to report negative values. Since Pascal (and maybe earlier) we have sensors with improved precision. Adjust the nvkm_get_temp method to be able to deal with those changes and let hwmon return an error properly. Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst at
2020 Sep 16
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau: return temperatures in temp_get() via parameter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > The temp_get() function currently returns negative error numbers or a > temperature. However, the thermal sensors can (in theory) measure > negative temperatures. Some implementations of temp_get() correctly > clamp negative temperature readings to 0 so that users do not mistake > them for
2017 Nov 17
0
[PATCH 03/32] therm: Split return code and value in nvkm_get_temp
The current hwmon code doesn't check if the returned value was actually an error. Since Kepler temperature sensors are able to report negative values. Those negative values are not for error reporting, but rather when you buried your GPU in snow somewhere in Antarctica and still want a valid temperature to be reported (unverified). Since Pascal (and maybe earlier) we have sensors with
2020 Sep 17
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau: return temperatures in temp_get() via parameter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:03:22PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:01 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > The temp_get() function currently returns negative error numbers or a > > > temperature. However, the thermal
2017 Nov 22
0
[PATCH 03/32] therm: Split return code and value in nvkm_get_temp
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote: > On 17/11/17 02:04, Karol Herbst wrote: >> The current hwmon code doesn't check if the returned value was actually an >> error. >> >> Since Kepler temperature sensors are able to report negative values. Those >> negative values are not for error reporting, but rather when you
2017 Oct 08
1
[RFC PATCH 01/29] therm: split return code and value in nvkm_get_temp
As you changed the return value of `temp_get()` to solely be the error code, or absence of an error, I would change all those tests that checked whether the returned value was strictly less, or greater than, 0 to now only compare against 0 (no error). For example, if (therm && therm->attr_get && nvkm_therm_temp_get(therm, &val) < 0) if
2017 Nov 22
1
[PATCH 03/32] therm: Split return code and value in nvkm_get_temp
On 22/11/17 03:42, Karol Herbst wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote: >> On 17/11/17 02:04, Karol Herbst wrote: >>> The current hwmon code doesn't check if the returned value was actually an >>> error. >>> >>> Since Kepler temperature sensors are able to report negative values. Those
2020 Sep 16
2
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau: return temperatures in temp_get() via parameter
The temp_get() function currently returns negative error numbers or a temperature. However, the thermal sensors can (in theory) measure negative temperatures. Some implementations of temp_get() correctly clamp negative temperature readings to 0 so that users do not mistake them for errors, but some, like gp100_temp_get(), do not. Rather than relying on implementations remembering to clamp values,
2020 Sep 16
2
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau: return temperatures in temp_get() via parameter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:01 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jeremy Cline <jcline at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > The temp_get() function currently returns negative error numbers or a > > temperature. However, the thermal sensors can (in theory) measure > > negative temperatures. Some implementations of
2017 Nov 22
2
[PATCH 03/32] therm: Split return code and value in nvkm_get_temp
On 17/11/17 02:04, Karol Herbst wrote: > The current hwmon code doesn't check if the returned value was actually an > error. > > Since Kepler temperature sensors are able to report negative values. Those > negative values are not for error reporting, but rather when you buried > your GPU in snow somewhere in Antarctica and still want a valid > temperature to be reported
2014 Mar 24
4
[PATCH 1/4] pm/fan: drop the fan lock in fan_update() before rescheduling
From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> This should fix a deadlock that has been reported to us where fan_update() would hold the fan lock and try to grab the alarm_program_lock to reschedule an update. On an other CPU, the alarm_program_lock would have been taken before calling fan_update(), leading to a deadlock. We should Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+ Reported-by:
2020 Aug 12
6
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Add fine-grain temperature reporting
Commit d32656373857 ("drm/nouveau/therm/gp100: initial implementation of new gp1xx temperature sensor") added support for reading finer-grain temperatures, but continued to report temperatures in 1 degree Celsius increments via nvkm_therm_temp_get(). Rather than altering nvkm_therm_temp_get() to report finer-grain temperatures, which would be inconvenient for other users of the
2004 Dec 09
2
rsync seems to hang when --delete option is used.
Hi, When I use --delete option, it seems to hang for over 8 hours on 4.5Gb of total data. But when I remove the --delete option, I can see it starts rsyncing. Has anyone encounter this problem before? --Tony Shum
2013 Jun 25
10
[Bug 66177] New: pwm1 value not restored during hibernate/restore cycle in the event of manual fan management mode
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66177 Priority: medium Bug ID: 66177 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: pwm1 value not restored during hibernate/restore cycle in the event of manual fan management mode QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified
2017 Sep 02
3
[PATCH 0/3] Several hwmon fixes
We should simply return errors while the GPU is turned off, because the sensors aren't accessable and setting any kind of value doesn't make any sense. Fixes sensors values reported by "sensors" Before: nouveau-pci-0100 Adapter: PCI adapter GPU core: +0.60 V (min = +0.60 V, max = +1.20 V) temp1: -0.0°C (high = +95.0°C, hyst = +3.0°C) (crit
2017 Nov 17
35
[PATCH 00/32] Updated State of my clk patches
Last update here: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2017-September/028848.html Basically big cleanup, reordering, simplifications and some renaming to make the code easier to read and to review. I also moved some bugfixes to the front so they can be merged prior the other patches. There was also a bug related to the therm daemon triggering a pstate change leading to PMU lockups,
2023 Mar 20
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 01/17] drm/cirrus: NULL-check pipe->plane.state->fb in cirrus_pipe_update()
From: Alexandr Sapozhnikov <alsp705 at gmail.com> [ Upstream commit 7245e629dcaaf308f1868aeffa218e9849c77893 ] After having been compared to NULL value at cirrus.c:455, pointer 'pipe->plane.state->fb' is passed as 1st parameter in call to function 'cirrus_fb_blit_rect' at cirrus.c:461, where it is dereferenced at cirrus.c:316. Found by Linux Verification Center
2023 Mar 20
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 01/29] drm/cirrus: NULL-check pipe->plane.state->fb in cirrus_pipe_update()
From: Alexandr Sapozhnikov <alsp705 at gmail.com> [ Upstream commit 7245e629dcaaf308f1868aeffa218e9849c77893 ] After having been compared to NULL value at cirrus.c:455, pointer 'pipe->plane.state->fb' is passed as 1st parameter in call to function 'cirrus_fb_blit_rect' at cirrus.c:461, where it is dereferenced at cirrus.c:316. Found by Linux Verification Center