similar to: CentOS 7/8s EOL : infrastructure impacts (please read)

Hi, do we know what happens with the images at major hyperscalers and when? I?m interested specifically about GCP. Who is in charge of centos-cloud project in GCP? You or Google? $ gcloud compute images describe centos-stream-8-v20240312 --project centos-cloud architecture: X86_64 archiveSizeBytes: '7072654848' creationTimestamp: '2024-03-12T11:46:50.983-07:00' description:

On 18/03/2024 08:43, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote: > Hi, > > do we know what happens with the images at major hyperscalers and when? I?m interested specifically about GCP. Who is in charge of centos-cloud project in GCP? You or Google? > > $ gcloud compute images describe centos-stream-8-v20240312 --project centos-cloud AFAIK, the team building CentOS Stream doesn't push to

Am 09.02.19 um 19:56 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > I'll review the settings when we manage to upgrade to mailman3 Hello Aki, before updating to mailman3 consider an simpler update to latest mailman2. you're using 2.1.15, current mailman2 is 2.1.29 Your missing an /significant amount/ of DMARC fixes! and: more off-topic: while my messages *to* the dovecot list are sent using

Due to a needed upgrade , we'll have to move the existing CentOS mailman instance (aka https://lists.centos.org) to a new server/host. Migration is scheduled for """"Tuesday April 8th, 7:00 am UTC time"""". You can convert to local time with $(date -d '2024-04-08 07:00 UTC') The expected "downtime" is estimated to ~60 minutes , time

Due to a needed upgrade , we'll have to move the existing CentOS mailman instance (aka https://lists.centos.org) to a new server/host. Migration is scheduled for """"Tuesday April 8th, 7:00 am UTC time"""". You can convert to local time with $(date -d '2024-04-08 07:00 UTC') The expected "downtime" is estimated to ~60 minutes , time

On 09/02/2019 10:44, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > For some reason mailman failed to "munge from" for senders with dmarc policy ;( > > It's now configured to always munge to avoid this again. I'd say, let Mailman throw all people off the list that have enabled DMARC checking without using exceptions for the lists they are on. It's a known fact that DMARC does not

RHEL5 32bit xen 3.3.0 rpms? Anyone? ;) _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, Does anyone know what is happening with centos 8-Streams kernel? It has been behind RHEL for months now, RHEL8.7 has 4.18.0-425.3.1.el8 built in December and Streams has 4.18.0-408.el8 built all the way back in end October. Is there some policy somewhere that I missed that says that 9 will be now getting the focus or whatnot? thanks,

Hi, we''re contemplating getting a large new server, where we will run a number of virtual servers. Are there any things we need to keep in mind in that case? Are there limitations on what a Xen system can manage? We''re talking about a 4 x Quad core CPU server with 64 GBs of RAM and a couple of terabytes of RAIDed SATA storage. -Morten (Re-sending this, as the first message

Hi list, I installed two new servers to be our virtualization HA. This servers have CentOS 5.2, Xen 3.0.3, Drbd 8.2.6. The setup is ok, lvm drbd resources sincronizing, Guest VM running without any problem. My only doubt is that I can only use drbd resources inside guest vms when I specify the disk resource in vms config like this: disk = ['phy:/dev/VolGroup00/vappprtem01,hda,w' ]

Heh, Your sentiments on the website very much mirror my own, although I?m more focused on server applications rather than on desktop (we use Macs and Ubuntu for that). When Red Hat announced Streams, I was terrified at first and my first instinct was to switch to Rocky or a similar 1:1 distro, but then thought there might be something good coming out of the whole ordeal. And indeed it did, we

If you want to follow CentOS Stream development, I have two websites that grab CentOS-supplied XML and publish blog entries of updated packages whenever that happens: https://centos.passthejoe.net/ https://passthejoe.tilde.institute/centos/ Both websites have the same content. Frustration with CentOS Stream 8 development and security -- especially the kernel -- drove me to create this site so

This is really a git question but the problem is with rails using git and others may have come across the problem. I have a branch on my application''s git repository with edge rails as a subproject checked out into vendor/rails. this allows me to keep my application edge-compliant by checking out the branch (which creates the rails folder in vendor), pulling the latest edge rails and

At Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:49:56 -0500 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > > From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> > To: centos at centos.org > Message-ID: <fd4926e4-5430-7203-8f51-07d6ec4df2de at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem > References: <8831B7AE-76C1-4CF1-815C-EF52D4C5DE10 at abas.de> > In-Reply-To:

Hi Everyone, Do we have an EOL date for version 3.6? I was looking into the Release Planning wiki and EOL is not yet defined. Thank you, Lester

On 30/11/2020 13:39, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 30/11/2020 11:18, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> On 11/30/20 10:25 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >>> On 09/11/2020 14:24, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> This is a friendly reminder. >>>> >>>> CentOS 6.10 will EOL at the end of November 2020. >>>>

Hi Amos On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:32:27PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:51:47AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: > > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree > > FAILED: patch

Hi Amos On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:32:27PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:51:47AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: > > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree > > FAILED: patch

Hello. My setup: _ one Samba 3.5 domain (XXXXXXXX), with a PDC and a BDC, both running FreeBSD; _ one AD domain (YYYYYYYY) running on two Windows 2003 DCs; _ bidirectional trust between the two domains. Everything used to work until I moved the PDC from Samba 3.5 (EOL'ed) to 3.6; now, users from domain YYYYYYYY cannot access the PDC's shares. I used to have in smb.conf: >

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:08:46 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Nick Howitt via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > Could be that: > > > unix password sync = Yes > > Add a little delay, that ''confuse'' win10 box? > I doubt it, it is probably another artefact of the 'Windows doesn't care