similar to: Updating to Samba Version 4.19.5 via Debian Bookworm Backports

11.03.2024 17:40, spindles seven via samba: > Hi > > After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the

On August 16, 2023 spindles seven wrote: > roy at franks:~$ sudo apt -t bookworm-backports install samba winbind > Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... > Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that > some required

18.08.2023 10:47, spindles seven via samba ?????: > On August 16, 2023 spindles seven wrote: >> roy at franks:~$ sudo apt -t bookworm-backports install samba winbind >> Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... >> Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have >> requested an impossible situation

Replying here as well, since this is a frequent question. I uploaded the updated samba packages to the official debian archives in parallel with updating my repository - exactly the same source packages as are used to build samba for my repository. 4.18 should already be available on sid/unstable, I think. In trixie/testing it will migrate within 5 days if nothing other breaks. Updated bookworm

I have several devices, mostly amd64 and armhf architectures, all of which updated samba to 4.17.6 without any problems. But one which is armel architecture failed to update; instead I get the following when I try to update: root at goflex:~# samba -V Version 4.17.5-Debian root at goflex:~# apt update Hit:1 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease Get:2 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian

On 16 March 2023 20:22 Michael Tokarev wrote: > 14.03.2023 13:02, spindles seven via samba wrote: > This is one of many examples why I thought it is not a good idea to have the same > version of samba packages for bullseye on my repository as on testing/unstable. > But people insisted :) > > The thing is: both my bullseye 4.17 repository and debian unstable now has version >

18.03.2023 01:56, spindles seven wrote: > On 16 March 2023 20:22 Michael Tokarev wrote: .. >> Once you remove my 4.17 repo from your sources.list, apt wont be able to find the >> right version of samba for bullseye, even if "almost" the same version is available in >> bpo11. > > Thanks for this. However, I don't understand this last statement - once I

Hi! I've uploaded samba packages for debian & ubuntu in my repository, to include the fix for recent login/trust issue with 07/2023 windows updates. 4.16 packages will also be available later today (build is in progress now). http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ JFYI. Thanks, /mjt

Hola Iv?n, Good that you use MJT repo, but you probably don?t need it, bookworm back ports provides the same version these days. http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:installing-from-backports https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=samba&suite=bookworm-backports Regarding your member server, may I suggest you check out my notes, based on official samba wiki:

Thanks Rowland. Have submitted a bug report (No 11818). spindles7 On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:38:02 +0100, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: >On 30/03/16 23:26, spindles7 wrote: >> Hi all, >> I am consistently getting the error: >> >> root at dc2:~# samba-tool domain demote -Uadministrator >> Using dc1.microlynx.com as partner server for the demotion

On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > Hi Yvan, > > Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I need > to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then getting > the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just a little > over a month away, so there is ample time for planning upgrades. > > Best

On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> Hi Yvan, >>> >>> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >>> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then

On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> Hi Yvan, >> >> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then >> getting the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just >> a

On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> Hi Yvan, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the information, really useful.

30.04.2023 11:20, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: .. > There is a big problem with this, bookworm hasn't been released yet and as far as I can see, there isn't a bookworm-backports yet. > The only mention of Samba 4.18 that I can see in Debian is in experimental, a long way from any backports. No, there's no long way to bookworm-backports. I use experimental just because debian

On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:

On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba

On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,

On 30-04-2023 12:04, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:

Hi Peter, Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: > Hi folks, > > I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be > the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. > Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports > for Bookworm? > > I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a