Displaying 20 results from an estimated 110 matches similar to: "Bug#1065794: xen: FTBFS on armhf: xenstored_control.c:646:70: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘time_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]"
2024 Feb 05
7
Bug#1063270: xen: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Source: xen
Version: 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending sid trixie
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-arm at lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
2013 Sep 06
1
Bug#721999: xen: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libxenstore.so.3.0 needed by debian/libxen-4.3/usr/lib/libxenlight-4.3.so (ELF format: 'elf32-i386'; RPATH: '/usr/lib')
Source: xen
Version: 4.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi
New uploaded xen 4.3.0-1 FTBFS, see [1] for build log for i386.
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=xen&arch=i386&ver=4.3.0-1&stamp=1378426577
Regards,
Salvatore
2024 Mar 19
0
Bug#1067152: xen-utils-common: remove IPv6 link locals from switched interfaces
Package: src:xen
Version: 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1
Severity: wishlist
I wasn't sure if this script comes from Debian or Xen or somewhere else,
so I thought it safest to report it here.
IPv6 on the Dom0 should be removed from switched/bridged interfaces.
Earlier I would just sysctl disable_ipv6 on the interface, but the below
diff seems to remove the link local address too. I've
2024 Apr 26
0
xen 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the xen source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1
Current version: 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See
2024 Mar 19
2
Bug#1067151: xen-utils-common: vif-openvswitch ignores MTU
Package: src:xen
Version: 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1
Severity: wishlist
I wasn't sure if this script comes from Debian or Xen or somewhere else,
so I thought it safest to report it here.
/etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge handles MTU settings in the vif, but the
otherwise similar /etc/xen/scripts/vif-openvswitch does not. I added it
in, here's the diff-c and the full fixed file is also
2014 Mar 16
1
How to convert time_t to R date object
Hi all,
I am writing a R extensions, and I need pass time_t to R in C, but I don't
know how to do.
Can you give me some help? do not use double directly.
Thanks,
Bill
--
*Travel | Programming*
*http://freecnpro.net* <http://freecnpro.net>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2005 Aug 03
0
[PATCH] Use -Werror in HOSTCFLAGS; make xen/tools use HOSTCFLAGS; fix warnings
The attached patch adds -Werror to HOSTCFLAGS in Config.mk, makes
xen/tools actually use HOSTCFLAGS (it was already using HOSTCC), and
fixes some gcc-4.0 signedness warnings in xen/tools/symbols.c.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josht@us.ibm.com>
- Josh Triplett
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2014 Dec 15
0
Re: index-parse.c:1256:6: error: assuming pointer wraparound does not occur when comparing P +- C1 with P +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:54:51PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> No idea why this happens:
>
> index-parse.y: In function 'yyparse':
> index-parse.c:1256:6: error: assuming pointer wraparound does not occur when comparing P +- C1 with P +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
> if (yyss + yystacksize - 1 <= yyssp)
> ^
>
> It only happens on one machine,
2019 May 30
2
[PATCH nbdkit 1/2] nbd: Fix -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning.
GCC is concerned that if we never go round the loop then fd will be
uninitialized. By asserting that getaddrinfo set result != NULL we
can avoid this.
nbd.c: In function ‘nbd_open_handle’:
nbd.c:974:5: error: ‘fd’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
974 | close (fd);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
nbd.c:954:7: note: ‘fd’ was declared here
954 | int fd;
2012 Mar 28
0
[PATCH] tools/memshr: fix build errors caused by Werror
# HG changeset patch
# User Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
# Date 1332942876 -7200
# Node ID d0fe664fca8a7e7db8b46b2f6c267acc88fa9c78
# Parent 4bd752a4cdf323c41c50f8cd6286f566d67adeae
tools/memshr: fix build errors caused by Werror
-O2 -Wall -Werror triggers these warnings:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
interface.c: In function ''memshr_daemon_initialize'':
2014 Dec 15
2
index-parse.c:1256:6: error: assuming pointer wraparound does not occur when comparing P +- C1 with P +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
No idea why this happens:
index-parse.y: In function 'yyparse':
index-parse.c:1256:6: error: assuming pointer wraparound does not occur when comparing P +- C1 with P +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
if (yyss + yystacksize - 1 <= yyssp)
^
It only happens on one machine, and not on any others, even
though they have similar versions of gcc and bison installed.
Rich.
--
Richard
2012 Mar 28
1
Re: tools/memshr: fix build errors caused by Werror
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
> # Date 1332942876 -7200
> # Node ID d0fe664fca8a7e7db8b46b2f6c267acc88fa9c78
> # Parent 4bd752a4cdf323c41c50f8cd6286f566d67adeae
> tools/memshr: fix build errors caused by Werror
>
> -O2 -Wall -Werror triggers these warnings:
>
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> interface.c: In function
2016 Mar 23
0
[cfe-dev] New buildbot with -Werror
Could we change the buildbot config to treat
warnings-as-errors-that-continue in the build step? (so we get the benefit
of further execution tests, while still sending fail-mail, etc for the
warning?)
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:00 PM, David Jones via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I would like to propose adding a buildbot which builds with -Werror. The
2016 Mar 23
0
[cfe-dev] New buildbot with -Werror
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I think having -Werror bots is a good idea, at least when self hosting.
> Non-self-hosting -Werror (i.e. with older versions of Clang, or with GCC,
> etc.) might also be useful, but I'm less sure (since we can't fix those
> warnings if the warning is the problem).
On Tue, Mar
2016 Mar 23
1
[cfe-dev] New buildbot with -Werror
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> Could we change the buildbot config to treat
> warnings-as-errors-that-continue in the build step? (so we get the benefit
> of further execution tests, while still sending fail-mail, etc for the
> warning?)
>
>
That sounds reasonable, although the buildbot implementation seems to be
pretty
2016 Mar 23
1
[cfe-dev] New buildbot with -Werror
I just changed this build on green dragon to warn and email if warnings are found in the console log:
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA_build/
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 6:24 PM, David Jones via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at
2011 May 03
2
Bug#625438: xen: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
Package: xen
Version: 4.1.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian-gcc at lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.6 ftbfs-werror
This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings
which will make the package fail to build. Currently a Debian patch
just passes
-Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable and
-Wno-error=unused-but-set-parameter
to avoid build failures,
2010 Jun 18
2
[PATCH] hdt & gcc -Werror
From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>
Fix several calls to more_printf() as eventually printf() is called
without a literal string which generate warnings with gcc and lead to
errors when -Werror is active.
Signed-off-by: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>
The message "format not a string literal and no format arguments" at
first seems strange but by doing this change
2016 Mar 23
0
[cfe-dev] New buildbot with -Werror
----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Jones via cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> To: cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org, llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> Cc: gkistanova at gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:00:28 PM
> Subject: [cfe-dev] New buildbot with -Werror
>
> Greetings,
>
>
> I would like to propose adding a buildbot which builds with
2016 Mar 23
3
[cfe-dev] New buildbot with -Werror
My thought was that its reasonable to expect no warnings when building from
bootstrap (as you say) and the last release of Clang. Generally, I think we
should work around warnings in the last release of Clang if only for the
convenience of folks using that release to build stage1 and using Werror.
Certainly, we tend to fix warnings even from earlier Clang versions and
from GCC in order to keep