similar to: Opus 1.5 is now -- with ML

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Opus 1.5 is now -- with ML"

2024 Mar 04
2
Opus 1.5 is out -- now with ML
And it turns out there was a missing meson file in the original release so here's 1.5.1 with the file added: https://downloads.xiph.org/releases/opus/opus-1.5.1.tar.gz Cheers, Jean-Marc On 2024-03-04 11:26, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm happy to announce that Opus 1.5 has just been released. Opus 1.5 is > the first release to make extended use of ML in
2024 Mar 07
1
Opus 1.5 is out -- now with ML
FYI, the README file section on building for Windows says to see the README.md files in the cmake or meson subdirectories, but there are no README files in either of those subdirectories. -----Original Message----- From: opus <opus-bounces at xiph.org> On Behalf Of Jean-Marc Valin Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 12:52 PM To: opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] Opus 1.5 is out -- now with ML
2017 Jun 16
2
OPUS/FLAC Metadata
On 16/06/17 18:47, Marvin Scholz wrote: > This concatenation are valid streams, it's called chaining, afaik. So > players not supporting them are broken and the authors should be > notified about it, I think. And my question is... Is THAT the way an OPUS source communicates new metadata to the icecast server?. That is the question I would like to know :-). -- Jesús Cea Avión
2016 Jan 13
5
Test still failing in old CPUs
Opus 1.1.2. As experienced in previous release: """ ./test-driver: line 107: 25185 Illegal instruction "$@" > $log_file 2>&1 FAIL: celt/tests/test_unit_mathops """ -- Jes?s Cea Avi?n _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Twitter: @jcea
2016 Jan 12
2
Opus 1.1.2 released
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Just to let everyone know that Opus 1.1.2 is out. The release fixes two bugs: - - Resetting the encoder or decoder state with OPUS_RESET_STATE would disable some run-time selected architecture-specific optimizations; and - - In hybrid mode discontinuous transmission (DTX) operation, the comfort noise above 8 kHz was incorrectly estimated and
2017 Jan 20
1
Opus 1.1.4 released
Hi, We just released Opus 1.1.4, which fixes a single bug. A specially-crafted Opus packet could cause an integer wrap-around in the SILK LSF stabilization code. This would cause an out-of-bounds read 256 bytes before a constant table. In most circumstances, the consequences are harmless and the result is simply noise in the audio. This was reported as CVE-2017-0381 [1]. Contrary to that report,
2020 Mar 30
3
Multithreaded encoding?
I am interested in being able to encode a single Opus stream using several CPU cores. I get a raw audio input and "opusenc" can transcode it at 1200% speed (Raspberry PI 3B+). It saturates a single CPU core, but the other three are idle. Is out there any project to add multithreading options to "opusenc", or something in that line? Looking around, I have found this:
2017 Jun 16
2
OPUS/FLAC Metadata
2017-06-16 10:28 GMT-05:00 Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es>: > On 16/06/17 13:18, Marvin Scholz wrote: >> The source client is supposed to encode the metadata into the stream, >> not use any endpoint whatsoever to send them, for Ogg and >> other supported formats. There is nothing confusing about this. The >> reason this is different for MP3 and AAC is, that it is
2017 Jun 17
1
OPUS/FLAC Metadata
On 16/06/17 21:18, Marvin Scholz wrote: > Exactly Ok, GREAT: Thanks. I have another question: Could a MP3 source send metadata updates using ICY metadata (like clients receive new metadata, but in reverse order) or MUST I update via the HTTP interface?. -- Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
2015 Oct 26
2
recommended opus bitrate / opusenc setting for general?
On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 22:16 -0700, Thomas Daede wrote: > Everything above 96kbps on that table is speculative, as the highest > multi-participant listening testing done was at 96kbps. Here's the > results from that test, if you're curious: > > http://listening-test.coresv.net/results.htm > > As you can see, at that rate Opus ranged from slightly perceptible to >
2017 Nov 13
3
libopusenc 0.1.1 released
Hi, Just to let everyone know that I released libopusenc version 0.1.1. It does not change the API/ABI compared to 0.1, but fixes a few bad bugs. You can get it from https://www.opus-codec.org/downloads/ For those interested in testing it, there's an experimental patch to make opus-tools use libopusenc for the encoder:
2010 Jan 18
18
Is ZFS internal reservation excessive?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 zpool and zfs report different free space because zfs takes into account an internal reservation of 32MB or 1/64 of the capacity of the pool, what is bigger. So in a 2TB Harddisk, the reservation would be 32 gigabytes. Seems a bit excessive to me... - -- Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ jcea at jcea.es -
2015 Nov 26
2
Opus 1.1.1 is out!
Hi everyone, After much waiting, Opus 1.1.1 is finally here. The main changes are: - x86 SSE, SSE2 and SSE4.1 optimizations contributed by Cisco, - MIPS optimizations contributed by Imagination Technologies, - ARM Neon optimizations contributed by Linaro and ARM, - many architecture-independent optimizations, - memory footprint reductions, and - several minor bug fixes. The quality of the
2014 Jul 27
1
"Corrupted dbox file [...] purging found mismatched offsets"
Doing a "doveadm purge" today I got this: """ doveadm(jcea): Error: Corrupted dbox file /home/jcea/.thunderbird/dovecot/storage/m.686 (around offset=1385772): purging found mismatched offsets (1385742 vs 1380664, 185/275) doveadm(jcea): Warning: fscking index file /home/jcea/.thunderbird/dovecot/storage/dovecot.map.index doveadm(jcea): Warning: mdbox
2017 Jun 16
3
OPUS/FLAC Metadata
On 16 Jun 2017, at 5:41, Rick Keniuk wrote: > Is this the HTTP call for injecting the “song” metadata? > This is a capture (using RawCap in conjunction with Wireshark) of my > AAC+ stream metadata input to IceCast that works fine. > > GET > /admin/metadata?mode=updinfo&mount=%2FFVHradio_AAC&song=Fox%20Valley%20Hit%20radio%20-%20Hits%20from%20the%20Valley > HTTP/1.0
2019 Nov 28
2
ESEARCH is announced but it doesn't work
I am using Dovecot 2.3.4. I could upgrade if necessary. I see this capabilities after login in: """ a OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN
2015 Nov 27
1
Test failed!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Indeed, the reason that -msse* are there is because it's needed for actually compiling the tests (because of the #include of the intrinsics). But of course, -msse* has the side effect of (sometimes) producing illegal instructions. We'll definitely need to fix this, but I don't know how yet. In the mean time, you can either trust that the
2015 May 19
2
"doveadm backup" doesn't work anymore after upgrading to 2.2.18
Until today I could do this to backup my primary IMAP4 server: """ doveadm backup ssh csi doveadm dsync-server """ It doesn't work anymore after upgrading to Dovecot 2.2.18: """ jcea at ubuntu:~$ doveadm backup ssh csi doveadm dsync-server Enter passphrase for key '/home/jcea/.ssh/id_rsa': dsync-remote(root): Error: Mailbox INBOX: Failed
2014 Sep 28
1
"doveadm backup/sync" are badly documented
Most documents around there talk abour "dsync", but the modern way is "doveadm backup". This command is not documented in the wiki and there are a few details missing, like how to use it thru SSH. I am currently doing some tests about how to backup my mdbox. I can do tests in local using: $ doveadm backup -u jcea -m proveedores/dovecot mdbox:/tmp/aa/ This will
2014 Mar 26
4
Not backing up cache files
I am using mdbox for dovecot storage. I wonder if I could skip "dovecot.index.cache" files and, in general, "*.cache" files when doing mail backup. Those files are big and change frequently. What I feel from reading documentation [1][2] is that they could be dropped in the backups, to be recreated on the fly if needed. But I would like expert confirmation. [1]