similar to: Cannot Get Samba to Work Without Encrypted Password with Legacy Client

On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 20:10 -0500, Tygre via samba wrote: > Hi there, > I have looked for a solution to my problem on the Internet (and > in particular this mailing list), but couldn't find one, probably due > to searching for the wrong thing :-) > I have an RPI running Samba version 4.9.5-Debian. "pdbedit -L" > shows that the user "smbuser" exists. I

Hi there, Sorry to come back to that, I tried to follow the code at https://github.com/samba-team/samba/blob/master/source3/auth/auth.c#L214 (and below) but I still can't understand why one Samba client can connect, but the other can't. I can't understand why, with one client, the code would go into "check_samsec.c:183" (and return "sam_account_ok") while, with

NT4.0 SP4 gives me this error when trying to access a Samba 3.0.23c server. \\Omega300\files is not accessable The specific network password is not correct. omega300 is the samba server, running samaba 3.0.23.c on SCO Openserver 5.0.7. omg180 is a Windows NT4 SP4 box. omega is a Windows 98 box. Passwords are not encrypted. We are also using VisionFS (SCO's smb product, which they no longer

We have been running Samba 2.2.x for some time without problems. Servers are Solaris 2.7 and RH Linux. Clients are a mix of WinNTsp4 and Win2K. Server setting is for plaintext (un-encryted passwords). On upgrading the Samba server to 3.0.0, (smb.conf file unchanged): All WinNt clients fail to authenticare. Win2k clients authenticate correctly. On reverting back to Samba 2.2.x, all cleints

At a number of sites we are using Windows 2000 Server SP4 (APPSERVER) as a Terminal Server and a PDC. All user areas are stored on a NetBSD 1.6.2 server with Samba 3.0.7 using security = domain and a named password server. We've joined the domain from the Samba box (domain DOMAINNAME). In general everything works fine, but when a number of clients log on at around the same time (say 25 users

Hello, After an almost 19 year gap, I need to ask this list for help again :-) I have somewhat specific circumstances, where I think I can tolerate plaintext passwords on the wire as long as I get samba to authenticate against the system /etc/shadow (using PAM) in exchange. 0) I'm using Debian 8.4 (jessie), samba packages 2:4.2.10+dfsg-0+deb8u3. 1) I have created user smbtest with password

Hello all, I'm trying to set up my Samba server to use share mode security and tried to protect a share with a password. I've done the following on smb.conf [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios name = %h server string = Servidor Samba %h security = share client lanman auth = yes log level = 0 auth:10 [publico] path = /tmp

New Polices created Denver policy is 1684 Atlanta Policy is 1441 IP address added 10.80.13.163 - this is allowed only to ATM services Jason Prouty CCT Manager Network Engineering 303-928-1588 Desk 720-412-1942 Cell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Davide Ianni via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: samba at lists.samba.org Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Hello all, I guess that everyone knows the message "the trust relation between this workstation and the primary domain failed" when joining Win7 into samba domain. Unfortunately, the same problem appeared few hours/days after the machine was successfully joined in the domain(with reg keys from https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7) and user able to use it for awhile. Then at

Has anyone got any ideia about my issue, I'm trying to open a share in Linux from a desktop Windows, but stay asking the login/passwd. I'm using smbd 3.4.8 with winbind and mit kerberos, joining in AD Windows 2008 Server. [2010/07/08 13:51:34, 5] auth/auth_util.c:208(make_user_info_map) Mapping user [GRANSAPORE]\[thiago.ferreira] from workstation [TI-09] [2010/07/08 13:51:34, 5]

Hi, I have deployed a new file server (Samba version 4.6.2, CentOS 7) which is running as a member of an AD domain (The DCs are both Windows server 2012, forest and domain level is 2012 as well). I'm using the AD backend to store SID/UID mappings. So everything is working fine except for one specific user on one specific workstation (Windows 10) who can only access the file server with

Hi Harry, Here are the outputs. I've attached them as logs with this email too. root at sam3dc:/tmp/ldifs-gr# ldapmodify -Y external -H ldapi:/// -f olcdbindex.ldif SASL/EXTERNAL authentication started SASL username: gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth SASL SSF: 0 modifying entry "olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config" root at sam3dc:/tmp/ldifs-gr# service slapd stop

hi! is it possible to use a samba server for a backup-to-disk space on a veritas backup system??? my system: debian sarge samba 3.0.14a-3 windows 2003 server with veritas 10.0 sp3 i try to configur veritas to use my share on the debian maschin but i always get the following error message: es konnte kein neuer sicherungsordner erstellt werden. zugriff verweigert translation: backup

On 05.09.19 16:14, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > try adding 'null passwords = yes' to your smb.conf. I have try. but can't connect (NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_RESET). Log append. Config: [global] workgroup = workgroup dns proxy = no log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 5000 log level = 3 passdb:5 auth:5 syslog = 0 panic action =

Hi, I have some troubles to log in from a W2k station to a samba configure as PDC with LDAP as backend. Join the domain is OK browse from explorer and auth is ok I attached the end of log.0i427 (machine) and the smb.conf file Thanks Fabien -- Fabien VALLON - fabien.vallon@fr.alcove.com GNUstep - http://www.gnustep.org - -------------- next part -------------- [2003/11/17 18:49:09, 3]

Hi all, I've searched the list archives and found similar issues, but none of the resolutions I found worked for me. When I try to connect to my samba share with an Active Directory domain account, I get denied: $ smbclient -U SOTS+jason //media/tmp xxxxxxxx session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE Looking at the log files I found this (complete file is posted below):

On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:08:39 +1200 Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 20:01 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > On 22/04/2020 19:25, Enrico Morelli via samba wrote: > > > > On 22/04/2020 16:06, Enrico Morelli via samba wrote: > > > > > Dear, > > > > > > > > > > on my

On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:59:23 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 24/04/2020 11:38, Enrico Morelli via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:08:39 +1200 > > Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 20:01 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >>> On

On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:15:57 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 24/04/2020 12:32, Enrico Morelli via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:59:23 +0100 > > Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> On 24/04/2020 11:38, Enrico Morelli via samba wrote: > >>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020

On 24/04/2020 11:38, Enrico Morelli via samba wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:08:39 +1200 > Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 20:01 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 22/04/2020 19:25, Enrico Morelli via samba wrote: >>>>> On 22/04/2020 16:06, Enrico Morelli via samba wrote: