similar to: Stopping bdrb from another process gets the process killed

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Stopping bdrb from another process gets the process killed"

2008 Jan 03
5
Start script not working when run via Rake
Hi there I''m using the latest release (r300) and ''script/backgroundrb start'' works perfectly when executed on the server, but when put inside a Rake task, it doesn''t launch the worker processes. The Rake task is as follows: task :start_backgroundrb do run "cd #{current_path} && ./script/backgroundrb start" end When I run this task, the
2013 Sep 05
1
primary GID based access for user in 16 supplementary groups
We observe a difference between a Windows 7 client and Windows 2003/XP client when accessing directories that should be accessible via the UNIX accounts primary group GID. Windows client refuses access. Ignoring for now why the two different client behaviours (either some subtle difference in the requests or the way the Samba reply is dealt with) the question is what should be the correct
2012 Jul 25
3
Select rows based on matching conditions and logical operators
Hi, I have a dataset in which I would like to select rows based on matching conditions and return the maximum value of a variable else return one row if duplicate counts exist. My dataset looks like this: PGID PTID Year Visit Count 6755 53121 2009 1 0 6755 53121 2009 2 0 6755 53121 2009 3 0 6755 53122 2008 1 0 6755 53122 2008 2 0 6755 53122 2008 3 1 6755 53122 2009 1 0 6755 53122 2009 2 1 6755
2018 Aug 01
2
trying to resurrect discussion about "Cannot signal a process over a channel (rfc 4254, section 6.9)"
FWIW, now that privsep is mandatory I have no objection to including signal support in sshd. On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Yonathan Bleyfuesz wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose some ideas to revivify this subject. > > -First, we could add support on the client to send signal thanks to the escape characters. > (code :
2003 Feb 12
4
rsync in cygwin as service
Hello! I want to start rsync on w2k as service. If I try to start rsync from command line it simply do nothig: $ rsync --daemon Administrator@dm-w2ks /usr/bin $ ps PID PPID PGID WINPID TTY UID STIME COMMAND 480 1 480 480 con 500 04:15:03 /usr/bin/bash 1428 480 1428 1420 con 500 05:26:46 /usr/bin/ps Administrator@dm-w2ks
2019 Apr 26
0
[PATCH 06/10] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. This patch addresses the most basic stuff (mostly what is required for virtio-ccw), and does take care of QDIO or any devices. An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit addressable storage. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at
2019 May 23
0
[PATCH v2 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit
2019 May 29
0
[PATCH v3 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit
2019 Jun 12
0
[PATCH v5 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area within the common I/O layer for any communication with the hypervisor. Note that we do not need to use that area for control blocks directly referenced by instructions, e.g. the orb. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An
2007 Dec 12
3
BDRB, new version questions
Hi, we are trying to use BDRB for background processing of long-running reports, and have two issues - one is that worker does not see our Report class from Rails, throws a: /var/apps/ror_trunk/vendor/plugins/backgroundrb/server/master_worker.rb:22:in `load'': undefined class/module Report (ArgumentError) from
2008 Jul 05
2
Question on number of processes engendered by BDRb
I have two workers (ie two files in my RAILS_ROOT/lib/workers directory) on my Rails app. When I run a top on my box, I see *three* processes called packer_worker_r. Shouldn''t I just be having two? What is the third process for? Here is an extract of the output from my top command. The PIDs are 7084, 7085 and 7083. ============================================ PID USER PR NI VIRT
2008 Aug 18
0
bdrb without rails?
Hi, Just wondering how you setup and get bdrb running without rails? Many thanks
2008 May 20
1
Couple questions on BDRb and concurrent processing
My Rails site uses BackgroundDRb and I have a couple of questions: 1. Can someone point me to some sample code/examples for how to use thread_pool? The website doc says to add a line ====== pool_size 10 ====== in my Worker class which seems straightforward. I wasn''t able to understand this part though: ========= thread_pool.defer(wiki_scrap_url) { |wiki_url| scrap_wikipedia(wiki_url) }
2019 Apr 26
33
[PATCH 00/10] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV
2019 Apr 26
33
[PATCH 00/10] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV
2019 Jun 12
21
[PATCH v5 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV
2019 Jun 12
21
[PATCH v5 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV
2006 Nov 07
2
start a worker when bdrb starts
I am sure..again I am missing something, but I am trying to start a worker, when backgroundrb starts and it doesn''t seem to work. Here is my config/backgroundrb_schedules.yml file: feed_worker: class: feed_worker job_key: feed_worker_key worker_method: do_work trigger_args: repeat_interval: 20.minutes I even tried this from Rails controller: # def start_feed_worker #
2019 Jun 06
15
[PATCH v4 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV
2019 Jun 06
15
[PATCH v4 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV