similar to: SAMBA_INTERNAL dns-backend limitations

Dear list, one more problem. I've setup my host running a samba addc controller. Samba version is samba-4.11.6-r2. I've joined two win10 clients to my domain. One client has a static ip, the other one was configured to ask my dhcpd-daemon for an ip. Following the book from stefan kania, I modified my dhcpd.conf to execute some scripts I've found on ArchWiki to add my

On 25/10/17 13:22, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 10/25/2017 6:22 AM, Lukasz Zalewski via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> We are in the process of migrating our samba AD >> (4.1.0pre1-GIT-6be458d) to the latest 4.7.0 release. In the process we >> want to switch from the BIND_DLZ to the internal dns server. >> >> I have done some experiments in our test environment and

04.12.2023 11:12, ??????? ?????? ????????? via samba ?????: > Hello, > > > > We need to migrate our AD from NT PDC Schema Version 88 to Samba PDC, but we can't join our Samba to NT PDC or migrate SID History and Account Passwords to Samba PDC. > > > > Our company is over 3000 NT Servers and over 5000 Users and we need to migrate to Samba without Servers rejoin and

24.11.2023 14:57, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:30:13 +0500 > Anton Shevtsov via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a DC on samba 4.17.12 >> >> I want store sudoers in LDAP, and use sssd for get rules from LDAP. >> >> I was configured sssd.conf >> >> [sssd] >>

On 17/02/2020 10:24, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 17/02/2020 08:42, kaffeesurrogat wrote: >> Dear Rowland, >> >> Yes, I did. I'm reading a lot. Docs, books, ... Updates of the >> dns-server via DHCP is up and running, both for the reverse lookup zone >> and the forward lookup mechanism. I've set the lease time to a very low >> value to make

On 4/28/2016 1:05 PM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 28/04/16 17:21, Wayne Merricks wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've set up a simple domain using Samba 4.4.2 from source under >> Ubuntu 16.04. >> >> I accepted the usual defaults and basically followed wiki.samba.org >> to the letter. The main thing is I'm using Samba's internal DNS and >>

Guys, thanks for the catch! This time I removed dns-backend key from the command line and tried both variants: with and without "dns update command" in smb.conf: samba-tool domain join domain.com DC -k yes --server=vm-dc1.domain.com -v -d 5 2>&1 | tee join.txt And both times I got similar errors: either WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE or "TSIG error with server:

Hi, We are in the process of migrating our samba AD (4.1.0pre1-GIT-6be458d) to the latest 4.7.0 release. In the process we want to switch from the BIND_DLZ to the internal dns server. I have done some experiments in our test environment and everything seems to work ok, but I'm not sure how to handle the dns backend change. Is it just the case of running samba_upgradedns

On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:30:13 +0500 Anton Shevtsov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a DC on samba 4.17.12 > > I want store sudoers in LDAP, and use sssd for get rules from LDAP. > > I was configured sssd.conf > > [sssd] > config_file_version = 2 > services = nss, pam, sudo > user = _sssd > domains = TEST.ALT > >

Hi all, I've set up a simple domain using Samba 4.4.2 from source under Ubuntu 16.04. I accepted the usual defaults and basically followed wiki.samba.org to the letter. The main thing is I'm using Samba's internal DNS and not Bind (Bind is not even installed on the system). In the log.samba file on the first DC I kept getting this: [2016/04/28 17:01:02.716292, 0]

On 11/27/23 13:27, Jule Anger via samba wrote: Hello. > All versions of Samba from 4.0.0 onwards are vulnerable to an > ... > When a domain was provisioned with an unpatched Samba version, > ... > The patched Samba does NOT protect existing domains! > > The administrator needs to run the following command Just a check to see if I understand correctly: _ Samba 4.19.3 is

Hi, I have a DC on samba 4.17.12 I want store sudoers in LDAP, and use sssd for get rules from LDAP. I was configured sssd.conf [sssd] config_file_version = 2 services = nss, pam, sudo user = _sssd domains = TEST.ALT [nss] [sudo] [pam] [domain/TEST.TLD] dyndns_update = true id_provider = ad auth_provider = ad chpass_provider = ad access_provider = ad default_shell = /bin/bash

I am considering which DNS implementation and cannot determine exactly when someone should use the Bind9 manner with BIND9_DLZ Module. For my purposes, I will have AD and non-AD nodes on the network using either DHCP or static IP addresses. Some will be Windows & Linux clients joined on the Samba AD domain for logins. Some will be Windows & Linux clients that are standalone using

Rowland, thank you for answering! I have investigated this a bit, and I think that using 18.04 for the new DC will not be successful anyway. Reasons: the AD I have has been created back in the days when 14.04 LTS was fresh. The provisioning scripts worked differently. 14.04 has been upgraded to 16.04, and I think that I do not have all of the DNSes configured properly and this might be the cause

yes, I tried working with samba wiki and quad-verifying what is recommended to be checked. OK, I'll try to join using 18.04. the samba_dnsupdate tool does not have the --use-samba-tool option in ubuntu 16.04 2018-04-25 22:47 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:32:10 +0200 > Jakub Kulesza <jakkul+samba at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi, I hope someone can help me with the following problem. I followed the following guides to setup samba as an additional active directory server to my windows server with bind9 dns: https://www.tecmint.com/join-additio...r-replication/<https://www.tecmint.com/join-additional-ubuntu-dc-to-samba4-ad-dc-failover-replication/>

On 03-07-2024 19:36, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:52:39 +0500 > Anton Shevtsov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I tried ldap anonymous search in samba. >> >> Downloaded kali linux, run >> >> enum4linux -a my.dc.domain >> >> and get all group, users, sids, rids... without any

Hi, I've some trouble in getting samba internal DNS server in sync with others DNS (Windows) of my AD domain. samba_dnsupdate returns: update failed: REFUSED Failed update of 1 entries I'm running samba Version 4.5.12-Debian root at mysamba4dc:~# dpkg -l | grep samba ii  python-samba                   2:4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u3 amd64        Python bindings for Samba ii 

Hi I know that this has been addressed before but I couldn't find a solution. Summary: when attempting to write a dns record using nsupdate, nothing gets written to the zone due to the error: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Everything is working. We can login to the domain from the same client and we have sssd sending the dyndns update requests which also produce the same

I'm sorry, after double-checking the Louis's link I've found that the domain zone should be domain-wide, while the _msdcs stuff should be forest wide. I'll change it and try again. Apologies. >>>>> # samba-tool dns zonelist 172.26.1.81 >>>>> Password for [administrator at domain.com]: >>>>> 2 zone(s) found >>>>>