similar to: Legacy samba 3.x connecting to server 2022

On 9/27/19 12:48 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/09/2019 18:33, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> >> I understand the "Function Discovery" side and wsdd (which is fine for >> local same network discovery somewhat similar to Network >> Neighborhood). I'm saying that even without that if I browse to just a >> computer in Windows

On 9/27/19 10:39 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/09/2019 16:19, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> With the removal of SMB1 (by default) and everywhere (e.g. Windows), I >> noticed that when I open up a computer (\\computer-name) I can see the >> shares that I have access to... that is, from a Windows Explorer (in >> my case Win10).? Is there any way to

OK I found an account with RID 500 but it has another username. I inherited this AD from 15+ years ago. Everything looks fine, all the computer management stuff works and I can manipulate permissions and security BUT running robocopy still gives "Error 1314 Copying N TFS Security to destination Directory ********* A required privilege is not held by the client". I just noticed it does

Hi, folks, Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10, version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS 6.9 box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer supports SMBv1, and if you go to their site, you can install support for that manually.... The server running samba can *not* be updated to 7 - we have a lot of stuff based off

Hey Rowland, Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a linux user called Administrator but then where will the credentials come from? In my AD, I do not have a user called Administrator. I guess I must have a user with RID 500 though, I'll look for that. Thanks for your help, Greg On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:09?AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at

Administrator is a built in account in the AD. When you provisioned the domain with a password , that was Administrators password. LP On 29 Oct 2023 at 21:36 +0100, Greg Dickie via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a linux > user called Administrator but then where will the credentials

On 9/27/19 1:11 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/09/2019 18:57, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> On 9/27/19 12:48 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 27/09/2019 18:33, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> I understand the "Function Discovery" side and wsdd (which is fine >>>> for local same network discovery

On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:35:14 -0400 Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a > linux user called Administrator but then where will the credentials > come from? In my AD, I do not have a user called Administrator. I > guess I must have a user with RID 500 though, I'll look for

On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:14:52 -0400 Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Hmmm. I may have misunderstood. I don't believe it explicitly said to > do that but I took it as that. Should I create a local Administrator > account instead? > The whole idea behind the user map on a Unix domain member is to map the Domain Administrator account (RID 500)

Wells, Roger K. wrote: > On 06/28/2018 10:35 AM, mark wrote: >> >> Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10, >> version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS 6.9 >> box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer supports >> SMBv1, and if you go to their site, you can install support >> for that

Hi Andrew, If I give register user as vignesh/guest, its working fine. While selecting the Guest radio button, guest user is not working. Guest user is working fine without AD connection. Kindly do the needful. Thanks, Vignesh. On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:28 PM Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 16:24 +0530, VigneshDhanraj G via samba wrote: > >

We have a windows domain "AD" and a samba domain "SAD" running Samba 4.9 in AD-mode. We also have an old NT4 domain called "Samba" running Samba 3.6 + OpenLDAP. We have the same users and passwords in all three. The user objects in the "SAD"-domain have the same uidNumber as in the "Samba"-domain. Workstations and users log on to the windows

Hello, I've a virtual machine working as a samba server ("clear linux release 28640", whose relevant information are in the attached file "server_clearmi_28640.txt"). The samba client is an android 4 virtual machine (https://www.android-x86.org/releases/releasenote-4-4-r5.html). I can succesfully mount samba shares from the android "terminal emulator", with the

Louis, Did not mean to confuse. Before I upgraded to Mint 19.1 I could go to the network, click on windows network, click on workgroup, then office and the windows pc (office) would mount. No problems. THe folders on the windows machine would be accessed. Now in Mint 19.1 I get the error "Unable to mount location....". We traced this behavior to the UFW firewall blocking the

Hi, ? I have just provisioned a new samba setup with 2 DCs running ISC DHCPd in failover and I?m trying to get it to play nice with samba internal DNS but I?m having some issues. 1) I?m using on commit, etc triggers in the dhcpd config to call a script that calls samba-tool to add, delete or update DNS. This script works fine when I call it from the command line as the dhcpd user but when called

Hey Rowland, Hmmm. I may have misunderstood. I don't believe it explicitly said to do that but I took it as that. Should I create a local Administrator account instead? Thanks, Greg On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 3:30?PM Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:07:56 -0400 > Greg Dickie via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi,

Hi , I just need some clarification ; We currently use ntlm_auth + winbind for AD auth on Freeradius, will disabling SMBv1 break authentication for ntlm_auth + Freeradius ? Many Thanks Arnab

Le 13/10/2017 à 01:46, Jeremy Allison via samba a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:58:58PM +0200, Hadrien Grasland via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We're slowly deprecating SMBv1 support at work, so I'm trying to >> mount our Samba network shares using SMBv2.0. This should in >> principle be supported by the server, and seems works well enough >> for

2017-07-31 17:41 GMT+02:00 Greg Dickie via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > Hey guys, > > Thanks for the ideas. I made life easier for myself and just replaced the > SunOS (illumos) implementation with real samba. That works very well so > we're all good. Is it just me or is kerberos complicated? > At first, no it is not you : ) But after a while (and thanks to

I've got a Samba member server as part of a Windows NT domain. User accounts have the same name in both domain. I was having all sorts of trouble when winbindd was running with wierd groups showing up. I happened to screw up the winbindd configuration without noticing causing it to crash, but I ran snmd and nmbd anyway and suddenly everything started working perfectly. The docs say you