similar to: ustack() issues && correlating SIGSEGV activity?

Hi Ryan, > Does anyone happen to know why the ustack() doesn''t show lex, > yak, main > and _start? A quick look with the source browser seems to indicate that _rt_boot is code executed very early in the lifetime of your process by ld.so.1. What seems to be happening is that ld.so.1 has allocated some memory before DTrace got control of your process - long before main() was

Hi all, I am trying to write a D script which would print ustack() for every program in the system receiving SIGSEGV. All the stacks printed in trap()/sigtoproc() context do not have meaningful symbols. The following solves the problem to some degree but I''d much rather have a self-contained D script. dtrace -w -n ''fbt:genunix:sigtoproc:entry/arg2 == 11/ {

Hi, I'm having difficulty configuring Printing with Samba 2.2.4 and Windows 2000 clients. The samba installations is running as a PDC against LDAP. All the sharing of network file systems seem to be working perfectly.. I have a share [printers] path = /usr/spool/samba guest ok = yes printable = yes browsable = no guest ok = yes writable =

Since ssh-keygen is not listing the _types_ of keys I have in my file, wouldn't it be a good idea to make the -t switch filtering out the selected type of key when doing a listing with -l? i.e. in this case I see both rsa1, rsa, and dss keys: $ ssh-keygen -l -f ~/.ssh/known_hosts 1024 a9:4f:0b:b6:33:d7:d0:ad:6a:11:b4:57:25:7e:1e:f8 fluff.x42.com 1024

Hi all, Reading the wikipedia page on R, I stumbled across the following: http://fluff.info/blog/arch/00000172.htm It does seem interesting that the C execution is that much slower from R than from a native C program. Could any of the more technically knowledgeable people explain why this is so? The author also have some thought-provoking opinions on R being no-good and that you should write

I am trying to integrate John Levon''s ustack() helper for Python into the upstream Python sources. The method for doing this on Solaris is to compile the phelper.d script containing the helper into an object file using "dtrace -G". dtrace on OS X does not have "dtrace -G", just "dtrace -h". This works fine for USDT probes, but I am at a loss on how to

Make ga100_mc_device static as it isn't exported, to fix the following sparse warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c:51:1: warning: symbol 'ga100_mc_device' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux at fluff.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Hello, The Hotspot JVM Runtime group would like to put forth a project proposal to improve the capabilities of DTrace''s ustack()/jstack() actions to better handle non-standard user stack frames. This email will describe the background, the problem, and our proposed solution. We''re interested in getting a sponsor for this work to help us with the process of getting the

Hey list, Anyone have experience with acts_as_xapian and Cucumber? I''m struggling with updating xapian''s index, to actually "find" fluff that has been indexed.. In a scenario, I''m adding a bunch of articles, and in the actual search step, I run: When "I search for \"$query\"" do |query| %x[rake RAILS_ENV=test xapian:update_index]

I have a test program which has a call sequence of a(), b(), c(), d(). When I place a pid return probe on d(), I get a ustack that looks like this: a.out`d+0x19 a.out`b+0xd a.out`a+0xd a.out`main+0x3c a.out`_start+0x7a The c() method appears to be missing. I did some poking around and noticed that pid return probes

I'm sure this or similar questions have come up previously but I'm looking for a more definitive answer. The company I work for is in the process of going from Win NT 4/2000 (yeah we're up to date) to server 2008. However as I'm sure many of you know the costs are insane with having to re-buy licenses and what not. We've already purchased 2 new servers one of which for SQL

I have been doing some profiling using the profile provider. I have a command that runs more slowly on the T1000 than it does on prior systems and I am trying to find out why. Using the profile provider at 1000 hz, and aggregating on the ustack output, I find that the same function appears at the top of the stack on both platforms, but on each there are specific instruction locations within

Dear all, The other day I stumbled on this article, "A critique of R and S-PLUS" [1], and got curious on whether the points outlined are (still) valid. The article is quite old, dating 2004, but was updated several times. Regards, Liviu [1] http://fluff.info/blog/arch/00000041.htm -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm Do you know how to write?

Josh Coalson wrote: > I've been thinking about this, and here's what I > came up with. This kind of dovetails into the > discussion Mike Wren started about the etree > header. > > I was thinking about defining a FREEFORM metadata > block which may be of arbitrary size. The only > mandatory field would be a (say, 32-bit) id of > the owner. In your case, you

One thing that is keeping Speex from being adopted is a lack of GUI players. I think that Speex could benefit from an offial cross-platform GUI player. The goal of the player should be to be stable, to the point(no fluff like visualisations, playlists, an equaliser, etc.), self contained(no external .DLLs, etc), and to be small(500k or less) so that people with modems don't have to wait

Hello, This one has been bugging me for a long time and I have never found a solution. I am using R version 2.15.1 but it has come up in older versions of R I have used over the past 2-3 years. Q: Am I wrong to expect that R should handle hundreds of iterations of the base model or statistical functions, embedded within for loops, in one script run? I have found that when I write scripts that do

Misters, Let me introduce myself : Guillaume FORTAINE, Engineer in Computer Science. Me and my partners are currently working on a Virtualization Firmware. After an analysis of the various solutions (Citrix, VMware and Microsoft), it seemed natural to our eyes, to enable a true bare-metal hypervisor, to go as close as possible to the hardware, hence the BIOS. That's why we are currently

I am pleased to announce that Radiant CMS is now publically available from the Subversion repository at: http://radiantcms.org/ What is Radiant? ---------------- Radiant is a no-fluff, open source content management system designed for small teams. It is similar to Textpattern or MovableType, but is a general purpose content management system (not a blogging engine). Radiant features:

First of all, if Asterisk is the client and it must register to the other side, does the peer\user entry have to be in sip.conf, or can it be in ARA? Second, why do all calls fall through to the last context specified, whether in that peer\user definition or not? I'm assuming it's a typo somewhere, but I can't find it. I had a full sip.conf, but axed a lot of the fluff trying to

I'm upgrading my primary server from RH 7.2 to CentOS-4.3.ServerCD. I REALLY like the ServerCD. Who needs all the fluff that comes with a standard distro? If I want a system-config-gooey I can run Xnest [1] and ssh -X from my laptop. Anyway I have two questions: 1) How can I collectively stop all the NFS, portmap, whatever? I'm hoping it can be manipulated as a group because occationally