similar to: Physical Domain Structure and Logical Domain

I''ve tried using S10 U6 to reinstall the boot file (instead of U5) over jumpstart as its a ldom, noticed a another error. Boot device: /virtual-devices at 100/channel-devices at 200/network at 0 File and args: -s Requesting Internet Address for 0:14:4f:f9:84:f3 boot: cannot open kernel/sparcv9/unix Enter filename [kernel/sparcv9/unix]: Has anyone seen this error on U6 jumpstart or is

Hello DTracers, The CPU caps project (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/rm/rctls/cpu-caps/) introduces kernel "wait queues" where threads may be placed to enforce caps. I would like to make this visible through DTrace and to add two new probes to the sched provider with the following semantics: cpucaps-sleep Probe that fires immediately before the current thread is placed on a

Hi All, We are currently in the process of testing Solaris 10 with ZFS and Oracle and are running it on a T2000. When checking performance statistics on the T2000, we notice that only one thread of the CPU appears to be doing any of the processing. Leaving all other threads seemingly idle. Are there any tuning parameters that need to be set or changed when running Oracle on T2000 using

I have recently upgraded a Samba server running on a Red Hat Enterprise 4 (32 bit) server. The version of samba upgraded to is 3.0.25b. I noticed that a new index had to be added to my ldap (openldap) server for the sambaSID attribute. So I added the index line to slapd.conf as follows: Index sambaSID eq,sub Afterwards I ran slapindex to recreate the indices in the openldap database.

Hi all, It would appear that I have a zpool corruption issue to deal with... pool is exported, but upon trying to import it, server panics.  Are there any tools available on a zpool that is in an exported state?  I''ve got a separate test bed in which I''m trying to recreate, but I keep getting messages to the effect of need to import the pool first.  Suggestions? thanks Jay

Paul, > While testing iscsi targets exported from thumpers via 10GbE and > imported 10GbE on T2000s I am not seeing the throughput I expect, > and more importantly there is a tremendous amount of read IO > happending on a purely sequential write workload. (Note all systems > have Sun 10GbE cards and are running Nevada b65.) The read IO activity you are seeing is a direct

This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: zfs list default output 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Rich Morris 1.3 Date of This Document: 19 October, 2007 4. Technical Description This case changes the default output of the post S10 zfs list command. The stability of the flags are

Hi -- I wanted to boot s10 HVM in 64-bit mode but it always boots in 32-bit mode. Is there a special grub entry to boot s10 HVM domU in 64-bit mode? Or is it HVM loader? The grub entry is like this title Solaris 10 5/08 s10x_u5wos_01 X86 kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot module /platform/i86pc/boot_archive s10.py file is as follows :- import os, re arch = os.uname()[4] if

Hi Linfeng, On 06/02/17 02:51 PM, Linfeng Zhang wrote: > However, the critical thing is that all the states in each stage when > processing input[i] are reused by the next input[i+1]. That is > input[i+1] must wait input[i] for 1 stage, and input[i+2] must wait > input[i+1] for 1 stage, etc. That is indeed the tricky part... and the one I think you could do slightly differently. If

Dear all, my problem is following. I know Stata, but currently I have to use R. Could You please help in finding the analogy to R. (1) creating of City-Dummy. I know in Stata: g byte city=0 replace city=1 if city==12&year==2000 and (2) Create a Time-Dummy-Variable g byte T2000=0 replace T2000=1 if year==2000 (3) I need the City DUmmy for the following combination: I have the

Hi Linfeng, On 06/02/17 07:18 PM, Linfeng Zhang wrote: > This is a great idea. But the order (psEncC->shapingLPCOrder) can be > configured to 12, 14, 16, 20 and 24 according to complexity parameter. > > It's hard to get a universal function to handle all these orders > efficiently. Any suggestions? I can think of two ways of handling larger orders. The obvious one is

Hello R-friends, i have a question to the "text"-function. a little test-dataset for better understanding: -the dataset was imported with read.table(....,header=TRUE) s1-s10 are the samplenames var1 var2 var3 s1 1 1 2 s2 2 3 1 s3 2 2 3 s4 5 4 3 s5 4 2 3 s6 6 3 2 s7 8 5 4 s8 7 2 1 s9 9 3 2

Hi Jean-Marc, Attached is the silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_neon() which implements your idea. Speed improvement vs the previous optimization: Complexity 0-4: Doesn't call this function. Complexity 5: 2.1% (order = 16) Complexity 6: 1.0% (order = 20) Complexity 8: 0.1% (order = 24) Complexity 10: 0.1% (order = 24) Code size of silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_neon() changes from 2,644

Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks a lot for reviewing this huge assembly function! silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_c()'s kernel part is for( n = 0; n < length; n++ ) { tmp1_QS = silk_LSHIFT32( (opus_int32)input[ n ], QS ); /* Loop over allpass sections */ for( i = 0; i < order; i++ ) { /* Output of allpass section */ tmp2_QS = silk_SMLAWB(

Here is what I have configured: T2000 with OBP 4.28.6 2008/05/23 12:07 with 2 - 72 GB disks as the root disks OpenSolaris Nevada Build 91 Solaris Express Community Edition snv_91 SPARC Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 03 June 2008

Hi Linfeng, Thanks for the updated patch. I'll have a look and get back to you. When you report speedup percentages, is that relative to the entire encoder or relative to just that function in C? Also, what's the speedup compared to master? Cheers, Jean-Marc On 05/04/17 12:14 PM, Linfeng Zhang wrote: > I attached a new patch with small cleanup (disassembly is identical as > the

Guru''s, Is anyone shar with me the steps to configure hardware RAID in T2000 server (LSI drivers) and use rootdisk hardware mirror -- Thanks a lot! Malahat Qureshi Ph.D. (MIS) Email: malahatq at hotmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I am curious if anyone has tested Asterisk running transcoding G.729 -> G.711 (ULAW) on Sun T1000 or T2000. I'd like to hear about your experience. ScriptHead -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060511/a6492f6c/attachment.htm

I''m having a serious problem with a customer running a T2000 with ZFS configured as raidz1 with 4 disks, no spare. The machine is mostly a cyrus imap server and web application server to run the ajax app to email. Yesterday we had a heavy slow down. Tomcat runs smoothly, but the imap access is very slow, also through a direct imap client runnining on LAN PCs. We figured out that the 4th

This is a great idea. But the order (psEncC->shapingLPCOrder) can be configured to 12, 14, 16, 20 and 24 according to complexity parameter. It's hard to get a universal function to handle all these orders efficiently. Any suggestions? Thanks, Linfeng On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Hi Linfeng, > > On 06/02/17 02:51 PM,