similar to: dtrace: invalid probe specifier

hello anyone faced this error before? dtrace: processing aborted: Abort due to systemic unresponsiveness I used iosnoop -evD > iosnoop.log thanks. __________________________________________________________ Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com

G''Day Folks, I''ve just rewritten iosnoop so that uses command line arguments (I caved in and used a little Bourne shell for this - hence it''s lost it''s ".d" extension). It''s much more useful now. # iosnoop -h USAGE: iosnoop [-a|-A|-Degstv] [-d device] [-f filename] [-m mount_point] iosnoop # default output

I have a number of systems running solaris10 and i see the package and binary for dtrace installed however whenever we try to run anything we get this error dtrace: failed to initialize dtrace: DTrace device not available on system the only system in which i dont have this error is the development server that has the full solaris 10 install while others are minimized, do i need additional

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

I have been using iosoop script (see http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/dtrace/scripts/) written by Brendan Gregg to look at the IO operations of my application. When I was running my test-program on a UFS filesystem I could see both read and write operations like: UID PID D BLOCK SIZE COMM PATHNAME 203803 4436 R 6016592 16384 diskio <none> 203803 4436 W 3448432

we have an SUN E450 server with soalris 2.6 and 512mb RAM running samba. we have a network and all the machines are connect through a switch. there are about 40 users who simultaneously use the server running samba for file service. The set up is like this. there is an application on the server which is shared and all the users have mapped their drive letter to that share. this application when

I am teaching a DTrace class and a student noticed that 2 iosnoop scripts run in two different windows were producing different results. I was not able to answer why this is. Can anyone explain this. Here are the reults from the two windows: # io.d ... sched 0 <none> 1024 dad1 W 0.156 bash 1998

I'm trying to install openssh-1.2.2 on a Solaris 7 box. I've downloaded the file openssh-1.2.2.tar.gz from ftp://thermo.stat.ncsu.edu/pub/openssh/files/ and http://the.wiretapped.net/security/cryptography/ssh/OpenSSH/files/. neither of theses tar's include the configure program as referenced in the INSTALL file. Where can I obtain the full distribution that will build on a Soalris 7

anyone installed WINE on SOALRIS 8 for INTEL?

I am trying to join a samba server to an active directory domain and I am getting the fowling error, any help is greatly appreciated. ---------------- # net ads join -U 'Administrator@MYDOMAIN.LOCAL' Administrator@BHPHOTOVIDEO.LOCAL's password: Using short domain name -- MYDOMIAN [2007/09/21 08:51:09, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:(70) net_rpc_join_ok: failed to get schannel session key

The open solaris dtrace page (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/dtrace/) has a bad link to the DTrace Guide(http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/817-6223). This message posted from opensolaris.org

Dear All, recently our customer met some udp checksum error in v40z, we have done below testing: Sending: v40z, solaris 10 update 2 with 125121-03 patch receiving: v40z with solaris 10 update 2 and a PC-server with windows 2 receiving host connect in the same network switch. in sending v40z, we set ip:dohwcksum=0 in /etc/system. The sending peer send out packets at about 40M/s, the windows

I''m troubleshooting an I/O performance problem with one of our applications that does a lot of writing, generally blocks just over 32K, sequentially writing large files. It''s a Solaris 10 x86 system with UFS disk. We''re often only seeing disk write throughput of around 6-8MB/s, even when there is minimal read activity. Running iosnoop shows that most of the physical

I''m curious to know what files are being used from a NFS server perspective. I''m unable to trace the client because it is in the boot phase. Looking at the io provider, I believe it does not allow you to look at what files are being requested. That would lead me to the fbt provider. Does anyone know what fbt provides the file handle for NFS client request on the NFS

I''m working on a case where customer has a 3rd party streams driver/module, called uplink, which sits over Sun''s ce driver. This 3rd party module is used by the telco to perform telco grade NIC failover. The customer was given an IDR ce driver, to avoid a panic they were given. The IDR driver was successful in avoiding the panic, but now the customer is getting many

Dear R-developers: I'm trying to build a 64-bit R-patched_2006-07-24 on SunFire V40z with on Solaris OS 10 64-bit kernel and using Sun Studio 11 compilers. Everything runs OK until it gets to building package tools (all.R) where it fails. Bellow is how I tried it (I can provide any other additional info if needed). Any help please? Thank you very much Latchezar Dimitrov Wake Forest Univ.

Hi, I am in dire need of some help. I have no problems connecting to shares with my W95/98 clients, but big problems with W2K. The same username / password is used on both the PC and SAMBA (and NIS - I am using Soalris 2.7 for my SAMBA server). When I try to connect to a share from the W2K client, I get the message "Access Denied". I have looked set nmbd / smbd to run at debug level 9

Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org wrote: >Not only that, but people forget that SPARC is not sold by just Sun. >SPARC is an IEEE standard licensed under "fair and non-discriminatory" >terms. The SPARC ISA and most architectural details are freely >available. Yep - but what is your point with bringing that up? >The _majority_ of my Solaris/SPARC experience in more

letting the opsys determine what access a user has to a file. I do not know if this is deliberate or not and it has pros and cons with respect to security. I solved the 'problem' by changing the group id on smb.conf to 10 (wheel on Linux, staff on Soalris) and changing the permissions to 660. Since only admins have wheel as their primary group, this restricts access to people who have