similar to: ipv6 with Samba-AD-DC?

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 23:32:30 +0100 William Edwards via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Joachim, > > > Op 15 feb 2024 om 23:09 heeft Joachim Lindenberg via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > > > ?Hi Rowland, > > No, I don?t have so many devices yet. > > Rowland believes that one should not use IPv6

I need to implement split horizon DNS, as I have just one external IP address (dynamic.lindenberg.one in external DNS) but multiple internal ones. External requests are distributed by port or using sniproxy (in particular 443), and all externally visible names are in a distinct zone then my domain, but with an additional indirection: names like backup.lindenberg.one resolve to CNAME

You copied the certificate file?? Am 22. Juli 2019 12:46:34 MESZ schrieb Joachim Lindenberg <samba at lindenberg.one>: >Hi Stefan, >> pls show how you fixed it >See >https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory#Kerberos >for the test. My fix was to take the one generated on the newer DC also >to the older one. >Joachim --

I figured it out myself. The kerberos configuration on the old dc cobra was bad ? no clue why it worked at all until yesterday. After fixing it, testing with kinit, and restarting the dc processes it resumed replication. Joachim Von: Joachim Lindenberg <samba at lindenberg.one> Gesendet: Friday, 19 July 2019 16:54 An: samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: replication stuck? Until

On 22/03/2024 09:20, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: > Not sure what Bitlocker integration you are referring to. Saving > bitlocker recovery keys does work for me with schema version 47. > Regards, Joachim We have tried a few times to use our existing schema version 47 and it's coming up with this error:- https://www.itdroplets.com/bitlocker-error-0x80005000/ A screenshot is

Hi Tim, then I believe there is a bug. I did not specify the option and it used /etc/smb.conf rather than the correct /etc/samba/smb.conf. I was running a local backup on DC with Louis build 4.10.6 on ubuntu 18.04.2. Shall I open a ticket? Best Regards, Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Tim Beale via samba Gesendet:

Hi Rowland, i.e. we probably have to help Jeremy finding a setup that makes this reproducible. Seriously this implies it can be a difference in users, authorizations, linux, samba, or windows installation or configuration. I was testing with a user that is a domain administrator. I just tested with a non-admin-user, also crashes. My samba is 4.10.6 from Louis running on Ubuntu 18.04.2 running

On Monday, August 7, 2023 6:05:03 AM EDT Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > https://github.com/samba-in-kubernetes > Andrew, thanks a bunch for pointing people to our org! I really appreciate it. More below... > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 11:08 +0200, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: > > Hello Anantha, Michael, > > IIRC this is somewhat optimistic or a secret sausage. For

Ok, with the smb.conf change and then samba_dnsupdate --rpc-server-ip=192.168.177.19 --use-samba-tool --verbose I got no error messages. Shall I now revert the change? Monitor? At present samba_dnsupdate has nothing to do.. Thanks, Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Rowland penny via samba Gesendet: Monday, 12 August

On 26/10/2020 14:43, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > > Hi Rowland, > > can I reset the machine password of the DC somehow? > > Thanks, Joachim > yes, see here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Security_Documentation#Manual_roll-over Also, please do not send posts directly to me, only to the list. Rowland

Its fixed now. I'll add an extra test so this wont happen again. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > L.P.H. van Belle via samba > Verzonden: maandag 16 november 2020 8:57 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba broken after dist-upgrade in > Ubuntu 20.04? >

Hello Rowland, If someone wants full_audit, will adding 'vfs objects = full_audit' on a DC also have dfs_samba4 and acl_xattr enabled just because running on a DC, or would this cause both defaults to be turned off? Thanks, Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Rowland Penny via samba Gesendet: Montag, 21. August 2023

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @

Hello Samba-ers, I tried to continue my Samba setup after a long pause doing other stuff. To recall, I want to run two Samba DCs for one domain as virtual machines on two Windows systems (I switched from VirtualBox to Hyper V, which helps to run them automatically at system startup, but I don´t think that really matters). Both DCs shall use themselves as DNS server as the VPN in between is

On 7/4/19 12:49 PM, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > * I am not (yet) familiar with LXD or nspawn. Do you have any pointer on how Samba DC works with LXD? > I've only used LXD for containerizing web applications so far.

Hi Kees, Thanks once more. To be precise: - you are running this on DCs? - no links required as on the wiki page? - "vfs objects = dfs_samba4, acl_xattr, full_audit" - I don?t have that in my smb.conf. What part(s) of this are default, required, or special? Thanks, Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Kees van

On 21-08-2023 18:17, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hi Kees, > Thanks once more. To be precise: > - you are running this on DCs? Yes > - no links required as on the wiki page? No, there are 2 ways of configuring it, the wiki has the symlink method, below is the other method. I don't like broken symlinks on my machines, therefore this is what I prefer. > - "vfs objects =

Ah, ok, my thats where its different here. My setup is AD-DNS => eth0 Server_split_DNS (Proxy) eth1 => internet > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Joachim Lindenberg [mailto:samba at lindenberg.one] > Verzonden: dinsdag 30 juli 2019 10:44 > Aan: 'L.P.H. van Belle'; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: AW: [Samba] split horizon and authoritative answers..?

Hi Patrick, thanks for the pointers. I tried today, and while it was easy to start my first container, I am not really happy with LXD, exactly for the reason St?phane gives in https://stgraber.org/2016/03/11/lxd-2-0-introduction-to-lxd-112/ "How does LXD relate to Docker/Rkt?"... what I really like about docker and docker-compose is, that it encourages to separate code from data and

Not sure what Bitlocker integration you are referring to. Saving bitlocker recovery keys does work for me with schema version 47. Regards, Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Paul Littlefield via samba Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. M?rz 2024 18:14 An: samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] Raise Domain Level, Forest Level