similar to: [Bug 3666] New: sshd crash

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[Bug 3666] New: sshd crash"

2017 Jul 03
2
Failure while upgrading gluster to 3.10.1
Hello Atin, I've gotten around to this and was able to get upgrade done using 3.7.0 before moving to 3.11. For some reason 3.7.9 wasn't working well. On 3.11 though I notice that gluster/nfs is really made optional and nfs-ganesha is being recommended. We have plans to switch to nfs-ganesha on new clusters but would like to have glusterfs-gnfs on existing clusters so a seamless upgrade
2009 Nov 15
2
Segmentation faults on SEXP conversion
Hello - I am making a first attempt at writing a simple C++ routine to print out R objects (this is a simple proof-of-concept as part of a larger package development). The relevant C++ routine is as follows: void Rwrite(SEXP fd, SEXP msg) { int *ofd = INTEGER(fd); const char * omsg = CHAR(asChar(msg)); printf("[%i] %s",*ofd,omsg); } And the corresponding interface in R is as
2017 May 29
1
Failure while upgrading gluster to 3.10.1
Sorry for big attachment in previous mail...last 1000 lines of those logs attached now. On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 19:11, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: >>
2012 Sep 04
2
[LLVMdev] branch on vector compare?
Roland Scheidegger <sroland <at> vmware.com> writes: > This looks quite similar to something I filed a bug on (12312). Michael > Liao submitted fixes for this, so I think > if you change it to > %16 = fcmp ogt <4 x float> %15, %cr > %17 = sext <4 x i1> %16 to <4 x i32> > %18 = bitcast <4 x i32> %17 to i128 > %19 = icmp ne i128 %18, 0
2012 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] branch on vector compare?
Am 05.09.2012 00:24, schrieb Stephen: > Roland Scheidegger <sroland <at> vmware.com> writes: >> This looks quite similar to something I filed a bug on (12312). Michael >> Liao submitted fixes for this, so I think >> if you change it to >> %16 = fcmp ogt <4 x float> %15, %cr >> %17 = sext <4 x i1> %16 to <4 x i32> >> %18 =
2011 May 09
1
rquest for help
Sir, Kindlly Guide me how to get the R CELFILES. I have install R but I cannat asses the command: Data <- ReadAffy() and I got the error: Error in AllButCelsForReadAffy(..., filenames = filenames, widget = widget, : No cel filennames specified and no cel files in specified directory:C:/Documents and Settings/pawan.k/Desktop. Wit regds, Pawan ________________________________ This e-mail
2012 Sep 03
3
[LLVMdev] branch on vector compare?
> > which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would use > > for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec? > > I don't think you are missing anything: LLVM IR has no support for horizontal > operations like or'ing the elements of a vector of boolean together. The code > generators do try to recognize a few idioms and
2009 Mar 27
2
Samba/LDAP Backend: Error NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
When I run this command I am not prompted for a password, I just get the below error. # smbclient -U root //zmail/homes Error connecting to 10.0.0.14 (Connection refused) Connection to zmail failed (Error NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED) --- Now for the back story: CentOS v5.2 with Samba v3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 and Zimbra 5.0.11_GA on x86_64 hardware. I'm attempting to connect samba (PDC) with
2009 Sep 18
1
Verification on HOW adding a machines works
I'm straddling the half-way point between samba and ldap. When adding a machine to the domain, functionally, it works like you would expect. You enter in the domain, enter your credentials, and reboot. The computer is able to function as a machine on the domain. I'm using the smbldap-tools as suggested in the wiki. Here's the script: add machine script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd
2017 Jul 03
2
Failure while upgrading gluster to 3.10.1
On 07/03/2017 04:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 12:28, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: > > Hello Atin, > > I've gotten around to this and was able to get upgrade done using > 3.7.0 before moving to 3.11. For some reason 3.7.9 wasn't working well. > > On 3.11 though I notice that gluster/nfs is really
2012 Sep 04
0
[LLVMdev] branch on vector compare?
Am 04.09.2012 00:08, schrieb Stephen: >>> which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would > use >>> for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec? >> >> I don't think you are missing anything: LLVM IR has no support for horizontal >> operations like or'ing the elements of a vector of boolean together.
2007 Jul 14
1
Very basic question about REXML
Hello Everybody, I have pretty basic question abut REXML. I want to put the String "John doe" in titles array, if attribute name is equal to "93". Please see the code below. I could not find how to do it.. any help would be very appriciated. Here is the XML i am trying to parse <entrydata columnnumber="2" name="93"> <text>John
2017 Jul 03
1
Failure while upgrading gluster to 3.10.1
Hi Kaleb, Thanks, this refers to 3.11.x On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/03/2017 06:29 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > >> On 07/03/2017 04:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 12:28, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Atin,
2017 Jul 03
0
Failure while upgrading gluster to 3.10.1
On 07/03/2017 06:29 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 07/03/2017 04:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 12:28, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: >> >> Hello Atin, >> >> I've gotten around to this and was able to get upgrade done using >> 3.7.0 before moving to 3.11. For some reason 3.7.9 wasn't
2009 Nov 02
2
hardware requirements for asterisk
hello friends friend i had just finished my chapters of asterisk. ill be configuring asterisk in for home for r/d purpose. i am having p4 machine with 1 GB RAM, ill be configuring asterisk on centos 5.3, the only doubt which i am having is which hardware ill have to buy to configure asterisk. i think analog card ? plz clear my doubt. n be with me from beginning till end, of the journey of
2005 Aug 11
4
win32-process + ruby-breakpoint = strangebehavior
> -----Original Message----- > From: win32utils-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org > [mailto:win32utils-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of > Bill Atkins > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:39 AM > To: win32utils-devel@rubyforge.org > Subject: [Win32utils-devel] win32-process + ruby-breakpoint = > strangebehavior > > > I''m getting really strange
2003 Jul 16
1
Problen in cbq , fw
Hi, In my LAN Iam trying to make following setup: - All the traffic generated by 10.0.2.1 should go to 10.0.2.11, If the destination of this traffic is internet than it should be placed on its interface eth1. Outgoing traffic on eth1 should be shaped.For this I am using fw filters and cbq. _______ 10.0.2.1 -------> 10.0.2.11(eth0 )----| A
2017 Jul 03
0
Failure while upgrading gluster to 3.10.1
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 12:28, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: > Hello Atin, > > I've gotten around to this and was able to get upgrade done using 3.7.0 > before moving to 3.11. For some reason 3.7.9 wasn't working well. > > On 3.11 though I notice that gluster/nfs is really made optional and > nfs-ganesha is being recommended. We have plans to
2009 Nov 13
1
FW: hi Dan
Please stop emailing me personally. If no one replies to a post, it means that everyone is busy or they think you should read through the documentation before posting. If you can't figure out simple things like Music on hold from the documentation, then i dont think VOIP is for you. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk at opensourcesolution.in [mailto:asterisk at opensourcesolution.in]
2017 Sep 20
2
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
We have quite a lot of code in AutoUpgrade.cpp to upgrade X86 intrinsics that have been replaced with native IR over the years. Has enough time and/or versions passed that we can begin phasing out some of this code? As I'm writing these we don't seem to have tests for a lot of the older upgrades. We've done better at this in the last few years. 3.1 added upgrade for: