similar to: Listing behaviour in 4.18

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Listing behaviour in 4.18"

2024 Feb 06
1
Listing behaviour in 4.18
So 4.18.10 has this fix of the bug as observed in that respect, but I think you are seeing a broader example of that issue. NFS4 in this context is not actual NFS, but a type of unix filesystem permission system closely modelled on NT ACLs, deployed in many filesystems Samba uses, as the translation is much more direct. But even without that, it may be we are seeing the same issues, say for
2024 Jan 08
1
Filled up file system and glusterd not working anymore. To probe or not to probe?
Dear all, we have a replica 3 configuration an issue after that the file system filled up. The gluster daemon is not starting anymore on the affected node and the inconsistency that we noticed is that the /var/lib/glusterd/peers does contain only one "good" node and the other one is missing. Now what we would like to try is to probe from the affected peer the missing one. We also
2019 Dec 18
2
DNS replication issue
Hello, We are setting up 2 AD machines: New machine with subnet 192.168.1.21: Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.buster Bind version 9.11.5 Existing machine 1 with subnet 192.168.2.21 Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.stretch Bind version 9.10.3 Existing machine 2 with subnet 192.168.3.21? Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.stretch Bind version 9.10.3 All with BIND_DLZ backend, same
2019 Dec 18
3
DNS replication issue
Hi Rowland, Thank you for replying. Please find the output here below. Just a possible tip: _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com. output is present on the new machine but if we issue a host -t SRV _kerberos._tcp.example.com on addc2 it does not appear in the list. Kind regards. Collected config? --- 2019-12-18-20:30 ----------- Hostname: addc-new DNS Domain:
2019 Dec 12
0
Replication issues samba 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.buster
Hello, We added a new samba DC with 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.buster? to our existing 5 ones and can?t obtain replication. Comparing configuration with other functioning DCs did not show any relevant difference. The only difference during the configuration procedure was that DNS PTR and A records were added after joining the domain and not before. The sernet-samba-ad service is running but
2019 Dec 18
0
DNS replication issue
On 18/12/2019 14:07, Ilias Chasapakis forumZFD via samba wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thank you for replying. Please find the output here below. Just a > possible tip: > > _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com. > > output is present on the new machine but if we issue a host -t SRV > _kerberos._tcp.example.com on addc2 it does not appear in the
2019 Aug 29
0
Permission Issue
Hi, this configuration doesn't make any differenc in daily life. So perhaps an ID-Mapping problem? an ldbsearch --url=/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb shows dn: CN=Team IT and facilities,OU=HO,OU=example,DC=com,DC=de objectClass: top objectClass: group cn: Team instanceType: 4 whenCreated: 20180731103742.0Z uSNCreated: 3631 name: Team objectGUID: 7a27f859-97dc-4cf8-b4b1-c7b7cfe0f585
2019 Aug 29
2
Permission Issue
Hi, sorry to bother you: I have three AD in the domain. They all deliver different IDs: root at addc2:~# id testuser uid=3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) Gruppen=100(users),3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000036(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000014(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000001(BUILTIN\users) root at addc3:~$ id testuser uid=3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users)
2019 Jan 09
2
Online backup of domain fails
Dear all, I use the Sernet Samba packages in version 4.9.3. I try to do an online-backup of my domain by: samba-tool domain backup online --server=ad2 --targetdir=/root -Uadministrator and I get the following error: Committing SAM database Setting isSynchronized and dsServiceName Cloned domain DOMAIN (SID S-1-5-21-1996849263-3223042488-349429296) ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception -
2019 Aug 28
0
Permission Issue
Hai, First i must say, i dont use/know gluster. But I noticed you config (smb.conf) is a bit off. store dos attributes = Yes << is missing. And i would say setup netbios name and REALM in CAPS. And > ??? smbd:search ask sharemode = no Should be : smbd search ask sharemod >> https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.10.0.html See smb.conf changes, What i dont
2020 Apr 29
3
demoted AD remains in samba-tool drs showrepl
Dear list, in this corona crisis a delivery of a AD to a location abroad takes longer than I expected. I demoted the AD which is in delivery with samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server=ADDC3 If I know trigger a samba-tool drs showrepl I still see him in the list: CN=Configuration,DC=example,DC=com ??? NTDS DN: CN=NTDS
2019 Jan 12
2
Online backup of domain fails
Hi Tim, What we did: setting "log level = 10" in smb.conf then exdcute the following command: ------ samba-tool domain backup online --server=addc3 --targetdir=/root -k yes >backup.txt 2>&1 ------ Then we grep for the message with "call_nt_transact_query_security_desc" ------ grep call_nt_transact_query_security_desc backup.txt ------ And got nothing :-( still the
2018 Oct 15
1
bind9 and samba 4.9.1
Hello, I have the following problem with my bind9 together with samba 4.9 SerNet. If I start the bind9 I got the following error-message: --------------- Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=zfd,DC=forumzfd,DC=de Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: starting configure Oct 15
2019 Aug 23
2
plenty of vacuuuming processes
Hi, Oh sorry, of course: The running os is debian 9.9 and I'm running the sernet-samba-ctdb in version 4.9.11-15 This is my configuration: [global] ??? winbind refresh tickets = Yes ??? winbind use default domain = yes ??? template shell = /bin/bash ??? idmap config * : range = 1000000 - 1999999 ??? idmap config ZFD : backend = rid ??? idmap config ZFD : range = 0 - 200000 ??? hide dot
2019 Aug 29
4
Permission Issue
Hai, Great to hear i could help one with a gluster problem :-) And ofcourse your allowed to keep us up2date. So yes, plese, by doing that and sharing the configs it might help other people. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Benedikt Kale? via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 28 augustus 2019 17:37
2019 May 16
3
CTDB node stucks in " ctdb-eventd[13184]: 50.samba: samba not listening on TCP port 445"
Hi Martin, > Does a useful ps command (e.g. ps auxww) show smbd running? What do > the smbd logs say? no, root at ctdb-<HOST>:~# ps auxwww | grep smbd root     13192  0.0  0.0  12780   940 pts/0    S+   13:05   0:00 grep smbd There is no smbd, nmbd is running. Ahh, but the log says: [2019/05/16 11:26:38.702593,  0] ../source3/smbd/server.c:1519(smbd_claim_version)  
2019 Aug 29
2
Permission Issue
Hi, I have an old Fileserver which is working correct: This is the smb.conf: [global] security = ads realm = EXAMPLE.COM workgroup = example winbind refresh tickets = Yes winbind use default domain = yes template shell = /bin/bash idmap config * : range = 1000000 - 1999999 idmap config ZFD : backend = rid idmap config ZFD : range = 0 - 200000 hide dotfiles = yes server string =
2020 Apr 30
3
bind9 refuses to start -> zone has no NS records
Hi Denis, thanks a lot! > you said that the zone is empty. It is not a problem per se but for some > time Bind-DLZ has been a bit more strict and ask for a NS record for > every zone. So you just have to create a NS field in your zone pointing > to one of your DC and you should be fine. Internal DNS does not have > this requirements. > > samba-tool dns mydc
2019 Aug 28
4
Permission Issue
Hi again, regarding my post "plenty of vacuuuming process" a "gluster volume heal" seems to improve the situation. But I still have a strange problem: Sometimes a user don't have permissions to? a restricted folder when h connects to a share or logs in at a windows client. In some times all permissions are granted. If the user creates a file, the user and group is
2020 Nov 09
1
ctdb error after upgrade to 4.12.10
Dear Jeremy, thanks for your reply. I assume I load the the debug symbols by passing something in the [global] section? I now changed back to a fuse_mount to get my colleagues back to work again. Tomorrow at 17 CEST I can add a test share with vfs_glusterfs to test it. Best Bene Am 09.11.20 um 17:55 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 04:01:47PM +0100, Benedikt Kale? via