similar to: [PATCH] [v2] nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM registry support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[PATCH] [v2] nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM registry support"

2024 Feb 20
2
[PATCH] [v4] nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM registry support
Add the NVreg_RegistryDwords command line parameter, which allows specifying additional registry keys to be sent to GSP-RM. This allows additional configuration, debugging, and experimentation with GSP-RM, which uses these keys to alter its behavior. Note that these keys are passed as-is to GSP-RM, and Nouveau does not parse them. This is in contrast to the Nvidia driver, which may parse some
2024 Mar 20
1
[PATCH] [v4] nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM registry support
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 13:57 +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > Thanks for sending a new version of the patch. > > Please make sure that for future patches you include a changelog, such that > it's easier for reviewers to keep track of what has changed. Will do. > > .../gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h | 6 + > >
2024 Mar 30
1
[PATCH] nouveau/gsp: Avoid addressing beyond end of rpc->entries
Using the end of rpc->entries[] for addressing runs into both compile-time and run-time detection of accessing beyond the end of the array. Use the base pointer instead, since was allocated with the additional bytes for storing the strings. Avoids the following warning in future GCC releases with support for __counted_by: In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk', inlined from
2024 Jan 30
1
[PATCH] nouveau/gsp: use correct size for registry rpc.
From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> Timur pointed this out before, and it just slipped my mind, but this might help some things work better, around pcie power management. Fixes: 8d55b0a940bb ("nouveau/gsp: add some basic registry entries.") Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1
2023 Nov 16
1
[PATCH][next] nouveau/gsp: replace zero-length array with flex-array member and use __counted_by
Hi Gustavo, On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:11:43PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Fake flexible arrays (zero-length and one-element arrays) are deprecated, > and should be replaced by flexible-array members. So, replace > zero-length array with a flexible-array member in `struct > PACKED_REGISTRY_TABLE`. > > Also annotate array `entries` with `__counted_by()` to prepare for
2023 Nov 16
3
[PATCH][next] nouveau/gsp: replace zero-length array with flex-array member and use __counted_by
Fake flexible arrays (zero-length and one-element arrays) are deprecated, and should be replaced by flexible-array members. So, replace zero-length array with a flexible-array member in `struct PACKED_REGISTRY_TABLE`. Also annotate array `entries` with `__counted_by()` to prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the `__counted_by` attribute. Flexible array members annotated with
2024 Jul 29
1
[PATCH 2/2] [v6] drm/nouveau: expose GSP-RM logging buffers via debugfs
The LOGINIT, LOGINTR, LOGRM, and LOGPMU buffers are circular buffers that have printf-like logs from GSP-RM and PMU encoded in them. LOGINIT, LOGINTR, and LOGRM are allocated by Nouveau and their DMA addresses are passed to GSP-RM during initialization. The buffers are required for GSP-RM to initialize properly. LOGPMU is also allocated by Nouveau, but its contents are updated when Nouveau
2024 Jul 30
1
[PATCH 2/2] [v6] drm/nouveau: expose GSP-RM logging buffers via debugfs
Hi Timur, On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 06:07:20PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: The patch looks great, just a few more nits below. > The LOGINIT, LOGINTR, LOGRM, and LOGPMU buffers are circular buffers > that have printf-like logs from GSP-RM and PMU encoded in them. > > LOGINIT, LOGINTR, and LOGRM are allocated by Nouveau and their DMA > addresses are passed to GSP-RM during
2024 Oct 03
1
[PATCH 2/2] [v8] drm/nouveau: expose GSP-RM logging buffers via debugfs
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 04:56:16PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > The LOGINIT, LOGINTR, LOGRM, and LOGPMU buffers are circular buffers > that have printf-like logs from GSP-RM and PMU encoded in them. > > LOGINIT, LOGINTR, and LOGRM are allocated by Nouveau and their DMA > addresses are passed to GSP-RM during initialization. The buffers are > required for GSP-RM to initialize
2024 Oct 30
2
[PATCH 2/2] [v9] drm/nouveau: expose GSP-RM logging buffers via debugfs
The LOGINIT, LOGINTR, LOGRM, and LOGPMU buffers are circular buffers that have printf-like logs from GSP-RM and PMU encoded in them. LOGINIT, LOGINTR, and LOGRM are allocated by Nouveau and their DMA addresses are passed to GSP-RM during initialization. The buffers are required for GSP-RM to initialize properly. LOGPMU is also allocated by Nouveau, but its contents are updated when Nouveau
2013 Nov 21
2
H.264 engine differences between fermi and tesla cards
On 11/19/2013 08:16 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Hello, > > I hope this is an appropriate style of request for this forum. I added > code to support video decoding on the tesla cards that have a > similar-style video decoding engine to fermi cards (i.e. G98, GT21x, > the IGP's -- the falcon-controlled decoding engines, rather than the > xtensa-controlled ones), by using
2013 Nov 21
0
H.264 engine differences between fermi and tesla cards
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Benjamin Morris <bmorris at nvidia.com> wrote: > On 11/19/2013 08:16 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I hope this is an appropriate style of request for this forum. I added >> code to support video decoding on the tesla cards that have a >> similar-style video decoding engine to fermi cards (i.e. G98, GT21x, >> the
2024 Jun 12
2
[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object
Store the struct device pointer used to allocate the DMA buffer in the nvkm_gsp_mem object. This allows nvkm_gsp_mem_dtor() to release the buffer without needing the nvkm_gsp. This is needed so that we can retain DMA buffers even after the nvkm_gsp object is deleted. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> --- v2: rebased to drm-misc-next
2024 Aug 02
1
[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object
Store the struct device pointer used to allocate the DMA buffer in the nvkm_gsp_mem object. This allows nvkm_gsp_mem_dtor() to release the buffer without needing the nvkm_gsp. This is needed so that we can retain DMA buffers even after the nvkm_gsp object is deleted. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> --- Notes: v2: added get/put_device calls
2024 Jul 29
2
[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object
Store the struct device pointer used to allocate the DMA buffer in the nvkm_gsp_mem object. This allows nvkm_gsp_mem_dtor() to release the buffer without needing the nvkm_gsp. This is needed so that we can retain DMA buffers even after the nvkm_gsp object is deleted. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> v2: added get/put_device calls ---
2024 Sep 10
1
[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object
Store the struct device pointer used to allocate the DMA buffer in the nvkm_gsp_mem object. This allows nvkm_gsp_mem_dtor() to release the buffer without needing the nvkm_gsp. This is needed so that we can retain DMA buffers even after the nvkm_gsp object is deleted. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h | 1 +
2024 Oct 30
2
[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object
Store the struct device pointer used to allocate the DMA buffer in the nvkm_gsp_mem object. This allows nvkm_gsp_mem_dtor() to release the buffer without needing the nvkm_gsp. This is needed so that we can retain DMA buffers even after the nvkm_gsp object is deleted. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h | 1 +
2013 Dec 07
0
H.264 engine differences between fermi and tesla cards
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:54:45 -0800 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Benjamin Morris > > <bmorris at nvidia.com> wrote: > >> On 11/19/2013 08:16 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> >
2013 Nov 30
2
H.264 engine differences between fermi and tesla cards
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Benjamin Morris <bmorris at nvidia.com> wrote: >> On 11/19/2013 08:16 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I hope this is an appropriate style of request for this forum. I added >>> code to support video decoding on the tesla
2024 Mar 07
1
[linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION 1843e16d2df9d98427ef8045589571749d627cf7
tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: 1843e16d2df9d98427ef8045589571749d627cf7 Add linux-next specific files for 20240307 Error/Warning reports: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403071947.NUYuBx0G-lkp at intel.com Error/Warning: (recently discovered and may have been fixed) fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3246:26: warning: