similar to: udp checksum error with ipcl_tcpconn_cache

Hello, I'm running 6.4-PRELEASE, last built on 2008-10-05 with /usr/src updated on the same day. I had a panic that looks to me very similiar to the one described here (hence the subject): http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-September/045405.html What caught my curiosity is the message: Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: acd0: WARNING - TEST_UNIT_READY read

I am trying to use dtrace to trace all sscanf calls. I am able to use pid provider for this. But my application forks off children at times to handle requests. Is there a way I can stop the child process immediately after it is started so that I can attach a pid provider to that and trace the scanf calls in it? I have tried using the "create" probe but that did not help.

From: Bruno Delbono <bruno.s.delbono at mail.ac> > I'm really sorry to start this thread again but I found something very > interesting I thought everyone should ^at least^ have a look at: > http://uadmin.blogspot.com/2005/06/4-dual-xeon-vs-e4500.html > This article takes into account a comparision of 4 dual xeon vs. e4500. > The author (not me!) talks about "A

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

Author: szhou Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 56b02c555bfb41a423c9856c46c8918128e9d3c1 Log message: PSARC 2005/373 Contract for the Miniroot Repository 6263254 console output gets graphically corrupted after the newboot 6270368 grub does not honor vendor option 150 to specify menu.lst file 6271324 boot-archive.xml is delivered into the wrong directory 6271395 grub should show progress

Hello, I''m a newby to dtrace and have just installed the dtrace toolkit v0.92 on a core soalris 10 1/06 installation on SUN v40z. I have tried the following commands: iotop iosnoop but I get the message dtrace: invalid probe specifier and a lot of code. At the end it says: : in action list: failed to resolve uid: Unknown variable name Could it be, that there are some

I apologize if this has been covered before. I have not seen a blow-by-blow installation guide for Ubuntu onto an iSCSI target. The install guides I have seen assume that you can make a target visible to all, which is a problem if you want multiple iSCSI installations on the same COMSTAR target. During install Ubuntu generates three random initiators and you have to deal with them to get things

Hi, all I want to get some information of How xVM is integrated with Crossbow project. Do some buddies have those documents or blogs? Thanks --luke

We have several large ext3 file system partitions. One of them sets itself to read-only after getting journel problems. I understand that's a good thing, but obviously I need to correct the problem so that it will stop locking itself. Here are some details; OS is Redhat EL4 x86_64 running on a SunFire v40z, kernel is 2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp. The disk storage in question is external, via

I''ve been testing ZFS since it came out on b27 and this week I BFUed to b30. I''ve seen two problems, one I''ll call minor and the other major. The hardware is a Dell PowerEdge 2600 with 2 3.2GHz Xeons, 2GB memory and a perc3 controller. I have created a filesystem for over 1000 users on it and take hourly snapshots, which destroy the one from 24 hours ago, except the

Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org wrote: >Not only that, but people forget that SPARC is not sold by just Sun. >SPARC is an IEEE standard licensed under "fair and non-discriminatory" >terms. The SPARC ISA and most architectural details are freely >available. Yep - but what is your point with bringing that up? >The _majority_ of my Solaris/SPARC experience in more

Dear R-developers: I'm trying to build a 64-bit R-patched_2006-07-24 on SunFire V40z with on Solaris OS 10 64-bit kernel and using Sun Studio 11 compilers. Everything runs OK until it gets to building package tools (all.R) where it fails. Bellow is how I tried it (I can provide any other additional info if needed). Any help please? Thank you very much Latchezar Dimitrov Wake Forest Univ.