Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches similar to: "Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14"
2024 Jan 11
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:53:38 +0000
unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Issue Description
> After the upgrade of the Unraid server OS (unraid.net) from v6.9.2 to
> v6.12.6 (which upgrades the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12)
> access to shares stops working.
>
> Error Summary:
> [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992,
2024 Jan 16
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should work.
> Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on
> /mnt/user/PrivateShare ?
>
> Is either apparmor or selinux running ?
>
> Rowland
Thanks for the reply, I have included some responses
2024 Jan 19
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000
unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should
> > work. Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on
> > /mnt/user/PrivateShare
2024 Jan 19
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:12:12 +0000
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000
> unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba
> > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on
2024 Jan 23
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
Hi Rowland,
Thanks for getting back to me, appreciate your time and help. Apologies for the long response, I have tried to include as much information as possible.
On Friday, 19 January 2024 at 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Sorry to be so long in replying to this, but life got in the way.
>
> You initially had an incorrect smb.conf and you
2024 Jan 25
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 20:45, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> That is what I was looking for, the default 'idmap config' is set to
> 'hash', which shouldn't be used. Especially as it says 'idmap_hash - DO
> NOT USE THIS BACKEND' at the top of 'man idmap_hash'. I can understand
> using it for existing
2024 Jan 24
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:47:27 +0000
unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
> Thanks for getting back to me, appreciate your time and help.
> Apologies for the long response, I have tried to include as much
> information as possible.
>
> On Friday, 19 January 2024 at 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org>
2024 Jan 24
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:31:46 +0000
unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I assumed that the rearranged config you provided was for feedback,
Yes, they were just comments, but unraid should really fix their Samba
setup.
> I
> haven't made any changes to the configuration based on those
> comments. I'll send a message to the Unraid
2010 Feb 06
2
(no subject)
Hi
I Have a problem:
I'm sharing ~600 folders on my samba server:
[SHARE 192.168.0.20]
comment = Private share for host 192.168.0.20
browseable = yes
writable = yes
path = /var/archives/USERS/192.168.0.20
public=yes
hosts deny = 192.168. EXCEPT 192.168.0.20
[SHARE 192.168.0.21]
comment = Private share for host 192.168.0.21
browseable = yes
writable = yes
path =
2007 Oct 24
1
setuid question
I've got a problem I hope someone can help with. We have a directory on a
redhat box where we want anyone who creates a file (usually done with samba
access) to have that file be created as if by a special "user" and group..
Now in the smb.privateshares config file we specify force user and force
group..
However when we create a file in this directory it shows it being owned by
the
2005 Apr 07
0
[OT] snmp not reporting traffic values for a network interface
Hi all!
I know this is quite offtopic, but I found nothing in google nor in
the net-snmp mailing list, and I know there''s a lot of people here
graphing with snmp+rrdtool. I installed net-snmp 5.1.2-6.1 in Debian
to produce graphs for some ethernet interfaces. It seems it''s not
reporting correct values for them. Here''s my snmpd.conf (very simple)
and the output from the
2014 Dec 27
3
Use Samba with ACL for read Active Directory and set Permissions via it.
You right. I joined my Linux box into Windows domain.Of course. I attached my "smb.conf". Can you see it?
On Saturday, December 27, 2014 3:36 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote:
On 27/12/14 06:44, Jason Long wrote:
> Thank you so much.
> No, I'm not. I joined my linux to Windows domain because of AD. I can define some users in my Linux
2014 Dec 27
2
Use Samba with ACL for read Active Directory and set Permissions via it.
Thank you so much.I changed my "smb.conf" and "password-auth-ac". I attached two file for you and you can see them. My problem not solved :( and login windows showed and not accept my username and password, I attached it too.?I paste my "fstab" file here and as you see the "acl" is enabled for "root" :
## /etc/fstab# Created by anaconda on Wed Dec