similar to: Using DTrace to analyse ON build

The sched provider defines the stable "lgrp" variable that is the lgroup of the current CPU. This is mostly interesting when we can compare it with the actual thread home lgroup, so I''d like to extend the lwpsinfo_t structure with the new pr_lgrp field which will be implemented using translator. This will match the addition of the pr_lgrp field to the proc(4) lwpsinfo_t

Hello DTracers, The CPU caps project (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/rm/rctls/cpu-caps/) introduces kernel "wait queues" where threads may be placed to enforce caps. I would like to make this visible through DTrace and to add two new probes to the sched provider with the following semantics: cpucaps-sleep Probe that fires immediately before the current thread is placed on a

Hello zfs-code, http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/vdev_cache.c 72 * All i/os smaller than zfs_vdev_cache_max will be turned into 73 * 1<<zfs_vdev_cache_bshift byte reads by the vdev_cache (aka software 74 * track buffer). At most zfs_vdev_cache_size bytes will be kept in each 75 * vdev''s vdev_cache. While it

Hi list, while preparing for the changed ACL/mode_t mapping semantics coming with onnv-147 [1], I discovered that in onnv-134 on my system ACLs are not inherited when aclmode is set to passthrough for the filesystem. This very much puzzles me. Example: $ uname -a SunOS os 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc $ pwd /Volumes/ACLs/dir1 $ zfs list | grep /Volumes rpool/Volumes 7,00G 39,7G 6,84G

Tried to start up tcptop_snv on snv87 x86 and got <i>dtrace: failed to compile script /dev/fd/11: line 168: conn_tcp is not a member of struct conn_s</i> Line 288 has this line: <i>this->tcpp = (tcp_t *)this->connp->conn_tcp;</i> which, after looking at line 168 of <a

Hi. Someone currently reported a ''ss == NULL'' panic in space_map.c/space_map_add() on FreeBSD''s version of ZFS. I found that this problem was previously reported on Solaris and is already fixed. I verified it and FreeBSD''s version have this fix in place...

Hi, Question for the Apple team I guess... Do Apple have any plans to ship the DTrace Java API anytime? Just to be clear, I''m referring to the code under: http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libdtrace_jni Thanks. Jon.

Support for thin reclamation depends on the SCSI "WRITE SAME" command; see this draft of a document from T10: http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/document.05/05-270r0.pdf. I spent some time searching the source code for support for "WRITE SAME", but I wasn''t able to find much. I assume that if it was supported, it would be listed in this header file:

Perhaps someone has ideas on this topic, a recent attempt to play with Xen was a reather unlucky event, all what I will be able to demonstrate on that system is a PV ONNV domU which ikely will not be very attractive to the audience :( HW: U40M2, 2 x 2 core AMD revF procs, 8GB MEM, Phonix BIOS 1.5 (latest) 1 x 200GB internal SATA drive SW: dom0 ONNV build 82, latest VirtManager from

Hi All, Now that we have multiboot capable pxelinux, thanks to mboot.c32, I decided to try and remove pxegrub from my x86 jumpstart infrastructure since, in theory, pxelinux can now do it all. The problem I'm having is I'm not very sure I'm following Tim's documentation correctly... I'm not 100% what comes after the --- and whether the Sun kernel needs it's arguments

Author: akolb Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 9d3008a3418986c9f79c8afb06bca932abb62b95 Log message: 6283577 cfgadm configure panic - NULL pointer (mmu_fsr) dereferenced in module "ip" Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ip/ip_squeue.c

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1541 Summary: sftp: the do_stat() failure is ignored for chown, chgrp ops. in parse_dispatch_command() Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: sftp

Summary: If you use ZFS, do not downgrade from build 35 or later to build 34 or earlier. This putback (into Solaris Nevada build 35) introduced a backwards- compatable change to the ZFS on-disk format. Old pools will be seamlessly accessed by the new code; you do not need to do anything special. However, do *not* downgrade from build 35 or later to build 34 or earlier. If you do so, some of

I encountered a strange libzfs behavior while testing a zone fix and want to make sure that I found a genuine bug. I''m creating zones whose zonepaths reside in ZFS datasets (i.e., the parent directories of the zones'' zonepaths are ZFS datasets). In this scenario, zoneadm(1M) attempts to create ZFS datasets for zonepaths. zoneadm(1M) has done this for a long time (since

[ Redirecting to xen-discuss@opensolaris.org ] xiao liu wrote: > I installed Nevada b84 on my laptop then built latest onnv-gate > on it. > > After I installed it using Install and try to boot, > it panic for don''t know "/xpvd" (hvmboot_rootconf failed) > > Seems b84 don''t support xpvd/xpv, What should I do now, > should I use BFU instead?

I just went through a BFU update to snv_127 on a V880 : neptune console login: root Password: Nov 3 08:19:12 neptune login: ROOT LOGIN /dev/console Last login: Mon Nov 2 16:40:36 on console Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_127 Nov. 02, 2009 SunOS Internal Development: root 2009-Nov-02 [onnv_127-tonic] bfu''ed from /build/archives-nightly-osol/sparc on 2009-11-03 I have [

In usr/src/uts/common/xen/io/xnbu.c, function xnbu_cksum_from_peer() http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/xen/io/xnbu.c#110 we have this: if ((flags & NETTXF_csum_blank) != 0) { /* * The checksum is blank. We must fill it in here. */ mp = xnb_process_cksum_flags(xnbp, mp, 0);

Author: Darren Moffat <darrenm at opensolaris.org> Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Latest revision: 9bb308a0778101fcef9ff65336bcec8e68a7bd06 Total changesets: 40 Log message: resynv onnv-gate Files: .hgtags deleted_files/usr/src/cmd/fps/Makefile.inc deleted_files/usr/src/cmd/fps/Makefile.subdirs deleted_files/usr/src/common/crypto/aes/aes_cbc_crypt.c

SXCE b116,onnv 3.4 Installation process is fine and smooth,when try to boot for a first time get kernel panic(See screenshot attached). My conf file is below. -------------------------------------------------------- import os, re vif = [ ''type=ioemu, bridge=e1000g0''] memory=2048 shadow_memory=160 vcpus=1 builder = "hvm" device_model =

First let me say I''m deeply sorry for the mail storm that seeding the new hg/zfs-crypto/gate repository caused. An explanation of what happened and why can be found on my blog: http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/sorry_mercurial_hg_push_oops There is also a discussion going on in the tools community on how to ensure this doesn''t happen again: