similar to: Transfer roles from DC3 to DC1

Could you run : samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://dc3 ldap://dc4 --filter=cn,CN,dc,DC And compair that output? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Elias Pereira via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 7 mei 2019 15:48 > Aan: samba > Onderwerp: [Samba] DN lists have different size: 4065 != 4029 > >

Hello guys, Why did you upgrade the schema to '69' ? > > That is the schema from 2012R2 and is still marked as experimental. I do not know why I did this update. Maybe I thought I could use DC as 2012R2. <sad> Could you run : > samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://dc3 ldap://dc4 --filter=cn,CN,dc,DC > And compair that output? I made the comparison. It has a jumble of

Hello, dc3: http://pasted.co/6b703479 dc4: http://pasted.co/5068fc6e diff: http://pasted.co/025c3242 On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 12:08 PM L.P.H. van Belle via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, > > Now, differences is fine, but can you see if one of the 2 servers is > correct, and for that it might be handy to share the output. > > You can push the good DB to the

im on phone, had a quick small look at the dc3 output. is your time in sync, it looks like a 3 - 10 min different. gr. Louis Op 7 mei 2019, om 18:34, Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> schreef: Hello, dc3: http://pasted.co/6b703479 dc4: http://pasted.co/5068fc6e diff: http://pasted.co/025c3242 On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 12:08 PM L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at

Hai,   Now, differences is fine, but can you see if one of the 2 servers is correct, and for that it might be handy to share the output.   You can push the good DB to the other DC. ( a forced replication )   And i can understand why you upgrade ...  Did you see :    samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --help Usage: samba-tool domain schemaupgrade [options] Domain schema upgrading Options:   -h,

Hello, dc3 = principal DC dc4 = secondary DC I had this problem last month after updating samba to version 4.10.x. and also the schema from 45 to 69. But it looked like it had been corrected. Today I noticed that on dc4 there are computers that are not on dc3. I updated: 4.7.x to 4.8.x 4.8.x to 4.9.x and only after that I upgrade to 4.10.x version. When I run these commands: samba-tool

hi, I have this DC in aws to fulfill the authentication need of our moodle. # samba -V Version 4.17.7-Debian DNS with SAMBA_INTERNAL The replication of the users and groups happens correctly. Some errors in running samba_dnsupdate, but it is ok anyway. When I ran the command samba-tool dbcheck, I got the return below. # samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes

While this should work, neither is this particularly harmful. ?Links to objects that don't exist are ignored at runtime. Andrew Bartlett On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 14:39 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > hi, > > Any clue? > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 10:17?AM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi, > > > > I have this DC in aws to

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 14:14:56 -0500 (CDT) Mike Ray via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Recently tried transferring roles from Samba 4.3.11 to Samba 4.7.0. > Ultimately, both dcs agreed that the 4.7.0 dc (dc3) had all the roles > and replication and the databases were in good shape. However, during > the process, I got a lot of errors that seemed to magically >

Hello, I had posted this in another topic, but because the problem is different, I decided to create a new topic. Conf: - Primary DC/pdc Emulator as DC3 - Second DC as DC4 After an upgrade from schema 45 to 69 in DCs, when adding a computer in the domain and if the domain to respond is DC4 the synchronization for DC3 is not done. I already did several tests that I already knew and also new

Recently tried transferring roles from Samba 4.3.11 to Samba 4.7.0. Ultimately, both dcs agreed that the 4.7.0 dc (dc3) had all the roles and replication and the databases were in good shape. However, during the process, I got a lot of errors that seemed to magically disappear. Should I be worried? root at dc3:~# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS

I had set up a trust relationship between our domain and another configured domain on our network, and at first it seems that this is what caused the GPO problem. I removed the trust and it all worked again. In internal tests that I had done, everything worked normal. Of course this is different when we put it into production. :) I know the trust is not 100%, but would you have any way to

Hai Elias, Lucky you, im in a good mood and im "still" at work ;-) .. # Add [sysvol] acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol read only = No Did you set the parameter: APPLY_CHANGES_DIRECT="no" To yes, if not do it. Restart samba-ad-dc. Then, goto you GPO editor in windows, and klik every GPO object once. Some might complain about

On 21/03/16 15:44, Landau Daniil wrote: > I have the Active Directory domain with Windows 2008 R2 domain controller and Samba domain controller on CentOS 7. Samba is 4.3.5 (self-compiled). Forest and domain levels are Windows 2008 R2. > After joining Samba to the domain as the domain controller there were no DC=ForestDnsZones and DC=DomainDnsZones records on "OUTBOUND NEIGHBORS". I

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:38:16 -0500 Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 19:45 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > You seem to be missing two FSMO roles: > > > > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole > > > > ForestDnsZonesMasterRole > > > > Just what version of Samba are you using ? > > > My Samba 4.5.2

The principle was not made any changes to occur this problem. We infra have dc3 and dc4 ADDC. root at dc3:/etc/samba# samba -V Version 4.7.7-Debian (van-blle apt) Result of gpupdate /force in a joined computer client: C:\>gpupdate /force > Updating Policy... > User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were > encountered: > The processing of Group Policy

Thank you so far. But unfortunately I could not fix the problems. So I decided to start over again at a situation where all the fsmo roles resides on the old controller. Here is a transcript of what I did and the errors reported: The inititial position srv-kb-dc1:~ # samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SRV-KB-PRIMDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-Fi...

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:43:26 -0300 Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > Okay. How do I know if the command really ran correctly? :D You ran: samba-tool drs replicate dc2 dc3 DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=campus,DC=sertao,DC=ifrs,DC=edu,DC=br -d10 and got an error message. If you run: samba-tool drs replicate dc2 dc3 DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=campus,DC=sertao,DC=ifrs,DC=edu,DC=br

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 19:45 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > You seem to be missing two FSMO roles: > > > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole > > > ForestDnsZonesMasterRole > > > Just what version of Samba are you using ? > > My Samba 4.5.2 domain also appears to be missing these roles. > > Can I simply seize these roles? > > [root at larkin27 ~]#

I have a test setup of samba 4.1.6 under ubuntu 14.04. When I do the query shown at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Using_RFC2307_on_a_Samba_DC#Check_if_NIS_Extensions_are_installed_in_your_Directory it shows I have the ypServ30 container installed. If I change this query to -s sub then I find 3 entries in that subtree (see [1] below) However the full schema in