similar to: Cyber Power LE1000DG UPS

I have a Smart-UPS RT 3000 XL connected via serial cable to TrueNAS TrueNAS-9.2.1.2-RELEASE-x64 (002022c) which runs on FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p3. When I start the NUT service, I get the message: Oct 20 01:53:50 truenas notifier: very old or unknown APC model, support will be limited Which I interpret as an indicator of less than optimal operating mode. I suspect that the model identifier is not

Really nice write-up on the Samba-based Open Source project ! https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/07/an-easy-mode-for-zfs-we-test-the-truenas-core-12-0-beta/ Congratulations to the FreeNAS/TrueNAS folks ! Jeremy.

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:32:03 +0100 Carlos Alberto Balseiro Mayi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > ? > HI everyone. > > I've been analyzing a problem with an embedded Linux/FPGA device that > in some cases was failing to run properly when using files from a > samba share. After some time I've found it is related to Samba bug > 12783 and setting

? HI everyone. I've been analyzing a problem with an embedded Linux/FPGA device that in some cases was failing to run properly when using files from a samba share. After some time I've found it is related to Samba bug 12783 and setting kernel oplocks on global fix the issue. But while looking at that I have found a strange behavior I can't understand. I have guest ok = yes on the

Hi I have a bunch of FreeNAS servers and a TrueNAS HA server all spamming the logs with these messages every minute about their own source name (examples below). These boxes are on two physically separate networks, and I find it unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected loop. Any ideas on how to debug this? Samba version is 4.1.18. FreeNAS box on network A " Jan 5

Hello, I have a question about how/why rsync updates modification times, which I haven?t been able to find an answer to. I have two locally connected storage devices running TrueNAS Core: one is new and empty, while the other is filled with files. When I run the following rsync command: rsync -avPh --itemize-changes --stats "${@}" to transfer files from the full storage to the empty

Thanks a lot for your analysis. I just wanted to add that I think we are not using at all? The client is an embedded Linux/FPGA machine and it doesn't have mount.cifs . I think it is using https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LinuxCIFSKernel . It comes default with kernel 5.15 but I tried with a 6.10 and same problem happens. Best Regards, Carlos A. Balseiro El 2025-01-18 11:32, Rowland

That isn't how rsync should work with -a. Is something preventing it from backdating the file? What is the filesystem? Can you try copying your 2015 file with cp -a? On 10/9/24 14:56, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the > copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of > transfer

You are using rsync -a which copies (preserves) the timestamp. Meaning that rsync will copy the file then back-date it to the timestamp of the source file. Most copying tools do not do this though cp's -a does it too. Note that your itemized output says that the timestamp is different meaning that the file has changed since rsync last ran. Without the -a (or the included -t) the

Hi everyone. I'm looking to solve an issue with Samba on a NAS being accessed with TreeSize Pro. Using that program to scan through millions of files is eating up memory on swap and eventually crashing the system. It's scanning mounted CIFS shares on the NAS running TrueNAS with samba version 3.6.9 We have a test case and have been able to replicate the issue on another machine. The

Hello and welcome! Just recently there was a trip down the memory lane with another device with Richcomm-based hardware, and ultimately nutdrv_qx driver happened to support that one: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2395 Some key take-aways were: * try starting the driver with bumped debug verbosity (e.g. from command line, or using a `debug_min` setting with NUT v2.8.0 and

Heya, first time posting to a mailing list so please excuse me if I do something wrong :) I'm new to NUT and trying to get things working on my TrueNAS, I have a "Vultech 1500VA" UPS which comes with the software "PowerManager II" and it seems to be using the "richcomm_usb" driver. There are 5 devices in the compatibility list and I tried all of them, sadly to

Hi Kevin, The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of transfer and leaving it that way. Then any time I rerun that command it always updates the timestamp since it is always making it the time of transfer. I have a source file the has a modification date of 2015 and when I rsync it to day with -a the copied

Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> said: > The FreeNAS Mini from iX Systems is a good deal more expensive, but > the ones I've worked with have been reliable and well suited to > running ZFS with good performance. I just retired a TrueNAS (the iX Systems "enterprise" version of FreeNAS, on hardware they sold pre-configured), and I don't

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:47 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Really nice write-up on the Samba-based > Open Source project ! > > > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/07/an-easy-mode-for-zfs-we-test-the-truenas-core-12-0-beta/ > > Congratulations to the FreeNAS/TrueNAS folks ! > > Jeremy. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this

Hello, Samba folks: Is there a setting I could invoke, either on my server's Samba configuration or on my macOS smbfs configuration, which would make the hundreds of legacy symbolic links on the server's Posix file system appear as symbolic links on the macOS client? Does Samba claim that it will present symlinks on the server file system as symlinks to a client? Some background:

Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: > - They?re serious server-grade machines, not borderline flimsy boxes competing largely on price. Built in and supported from Silicon Valley, not China. :) iXsystems sells rebadged SuperMicro stuff, nothing special (not made in Silicon Valley). We bought an iXsystems TrueNAS (commercial version of FreeNAS +

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 11:48:32PM +0100, Torkil Svensgaard wrote: > Hi > > I have a bunch of FreeNAS servers and a TrueNAS HA server all > spamming the logs with these messages every minute about their own > source name (examples below). > > These boxes are on two physically separate networks, and I find it > unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected

On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:43:23 -0800 Jim DeLaHunt via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, Samba folks: > > Is there a setting I could invoke, either on my server's Samba > configuration or on my macOS smbfs configuration, which would make > the hundreds of legacy symbolic links on the server's Posix file > system appear as symbolic links on the macOS

On Nov 18, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: > > Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: >> - They?re serious server-grade machines, not borderline flimsy boxes competing largely on price. Built in and supported from Silicon Valley, not China. :) > > iXsystems sells rebadged SuperMicro stuff, nothing special (not made