similar to: NT_STATUS_PROTOCOL_UNREACHABLE

Le 13/11/2017 ? 21:07, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: > > Le 13/11/2017 ? 10:04, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: >> >> Could I just remove the content of the brick (including the >> .glusterfs directory) and reconnect ? >> > > In fact, what would be the difference between reconnecting the brick > with a wiped FS, and using > > gluster volume remove-brick vmstore

Hi everyone. I'm running a simple Gluster setup like this: ? * Replicate 2x1 ? * Only 2 nodes, with one brick each ? * Nodes are CentOS 7.0, uising GlusterFS 3.5.3 (yes, I know it's old, I just can't upgrade right now) No sharding or anything "fancy". This Gluster volume is used to host VM images, and are used by both nodes (which are gluster server and clients).

Hello All, Please help.. I can not join an additional new samba dc ver. 4.19.5 to an existing samba Ad version 4.19.5 functional level 2008 R2. Last week I successfully demote an offline dc3 and move the fsmo role to dc4. The command i used to join: it at dc6:~$ sudo samba-tool domain join NICHO.COM DC -UAdministrator at NICHO.COM --option='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes'

Le 13/11/2017 ? 10:04, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: > > Could I just remove the content of the brick (including the .glusterfs > directory) and reconnect ? > In fact, what would be the difference between reconnecting the brick with a wiped FS, and using gluster volume remove-brick vmstore replica 1 master1:/mnt/bricks/vmstore gluster volume add-brick myvol replica 2

Le 15/11/2017 ? 09:45, Ravishankar N a ?crit?: > If it is only the brick that is faulty on the bad node, but everything > else is fine, like glusterd running, the node being a part of the > trusted storage pool etc,? you could just kill the brick first and do > step-13 in "10.6.2. Replacing a Host Machine with the Same Hostname", > (the mkdir of non-existent dir,

Thanks for your response Le Mercredi, Novembre 15, 2017 17:38 CET, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a écrit: > I suppose the obvious question is, is the script executable ? It is. It's a simple perl script with +x. I can exec it from the comande line like /usr/local/bin/addworkstation.pl foo$ which creates the machin account like it should. I've also

Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 13:07 CET, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> a ?crit: > On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > > Any way in this situation to check which file will be healed from > > which brick before reconnecting ? Using some getfattr tricks ? > Yes, there are afr xattrs that determine the heal direction for each > file. The good copy

On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 09:53 +0100, Daniel Berteaud via samba wrote: > Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 09:35 CET, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> a écrit: > > > > This may have nothing to do with Samba, if you are running sssd, then > > this will be doing the authentication. > > sssd was providing the NSS -> LDAP layer, just like nss-ldap would do > (it

On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > Le 15/11/2017 ? 09:45, Ravishankar N a ?crit?: >> If it is only the brick that is faulty on the bad node, but >> everything else is fine, like glusterd running, the node being a part >> of the trusted storage pool etc,? you could just kill the brick first >> and do step-13 in "10.6.2. Replacing a Host Machine with

Hi, Since samba 4.7 I have setup auth logging, and while I can relate most failed passwords to users mistyping a password, there is one kind that I don't understand, happening across our samba-DCs. Things work without issues, but I'm just being curious. :-) > [2017/11/23 04:47:32.166753, 2] ../auth/auth_log.c:760(log_authentication_event_human_readable) > Auth: [Kerberos

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:20:03 +0100 Daniel Berteaud via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Now, the "funny" thing is that, it did work, something like 3 times > in over 50 tries. It's not just the config because, once it worked, I > removed the same workstation from the domain, removed the LDAP entry, > made no configuration change, not service restart and

Hi. I'm running samba 3.6.3 (on Ubuntu 12.04). This server is acting as an old style NT4 domain using samba as backend. Machine accounts are created using a script, called by samba (add machine script). Everything is working great. Now, I want to keep the same thing, but on Ubuntu 16.04, so with samba 4.3.11. Mostly everything is working as expected, except that smbd doesn't execute the

Am 23.09.13 16:00, schrieb Daniel Berteaud: > Le vendredi 20 septembre 2013 à 15:31 +0200, Thomas Stein a écrit : >> Hello. >> >> Is someone performing incremental backups via libvirt for qemu/kvm >> machines? I'm still having a hard time to >> find a nice procedure. I mean is it possible to make a full backup of an >> image on monday a do the next

We have to Samba DCs and a couple of Synology NAS connected/bound to the Samba AD. On regular basis the Synology NAS (I believe Samba 4.4.16) looses its connection to the AD outputting the error message, that the domain cannot be found. In the logs of the NAS I can only find the error message ?synowin: domain_test_join.c:59 net ads test join fail?. In the logs of the DC I notice that from one

Hello, I have set up audit logging and I find many entries of this type : ./auth/auth_log.c:760(log_authentication_event_human_readable) Auth: [SMB2,(null)] user [MYDOMAIN]\[MYWORKSTATION$] at [mar., 23 juil. 2019 07:49:43.486619 -03] with [NTLMv2] status [NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER] workstation [MYWORKSTATION] remote host [ipv4:10.x.x.x:49472] mapped to [MYDOMAIN]\[MYWORKSTATION$]. local host

Hi! My DC is running Samba 4.8.2(Ubuntu 16) I have windows 2016(member domain), running IIS... But my site in IIS, use user the DC (in portal), but now dont worked , is much erro in log.samba when autentcation in site with user dc... Any Idea? Regards ---------------------------- [2018/05/28 17:35:52.085263,  0] ../lib/util/fault.c:78(fault_report)  

On 11/15/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > > > > Le 13/11/2017 ? 21:07, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: >> >> Le 13/11/2017 ? 10:04, Daniel Berteaud a ?crit?: >>> >>> Could I just remove the content of the brick (including the >>> .glusterfs directory) and reconnect ? >>> >> If it is only the brick that is faulty on the bad node,

On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:58 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:51 +0100 > "Daniel Berteaud" <daniel at firewall-services.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for your response > > > > Le Mercredi, Novembre 15, 2017 17:38 CET, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> a écrit: > > > > > I

Hello, Yesterday I have used Samba to help me authenticate Windows uses within the Squid Proxy server. ( FreeBSD-6.1 + Samba 3.0.25 ) The Kerberos setup went fine. However I got the NT_STATUS_PROTOCOL_UNREACHABLE error code when trying to "net join" the domain. It seems this is Kerberos related. On the net some emails suggest using "kdc = tcp/server.name" syntax to deal

On 11/17/2017 03:41 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 13:07 CET, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> a ?crit: > >> On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: >>> Any way in this situation to check which file will be healed from >>> which brick before reconnecting ? Using some getfattr tricks ? >> Yes, there are afr