similar to: Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:53:38 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Issue Description > After the upgrade of the Unraid server OS (unraid.net) from v6.9.2 to > v6.12.6 (which upgrades the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12) > access to shares stops working. > > Error Summary: > [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992,

On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should work. > Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > /mnt/user/PrivateShare ? > > Is either apparmor or selinux running ? > > Rowland Thanks for the reply, I have included some responses

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should > > work. Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > > /mnt/user/PrivateShare

On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:12:12 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000 > unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on

Hi Rowland, Thanks for getting back to me, appreciate your time and help. Apologies for the long response, I have tried to include as much information as possible. On Friday, 19 January 2024 at 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Sorry to be so long in replying to this, but life got in the way. > > You initially had an incorrect smb.conf and you

On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 20:45, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > That is what I was looking for, the default 'idmap config' is set to > 'hash', which shouldn't be used. Especially as it says 'idmap_hash - DO > NOT USE THIS BACKEND' at the top of 'man idmap_hash'. I can understand > using it for existing

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:47:27 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for getting back to me, appreciate your time and help. > Apologies for the long response, I have tried to include as much > information as possible. > > On Friday, 19 January 2024 at 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:31:46 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I assumed that the rearranged config you provided was for feedback, Yes, they were just comments, but unraid should really fix their Samba setup. > I > haven't made any changes to the configuration based on those > comments. I'll send a message to the Unraid

Hi I Have a problem: I'm sharing ~600 folders on my samba server: [SHARE 192.168.0.20] comment = Private share for host 192.168.0.20 browseable = yes writable = yes path = /var/archives/USERS/192.168.0.20 public=yes hosts deny = 192.168. EXCEPT 192.168.0.20 [SHARE 192.168.0.21] comment = Private share for host 192.168.0.21 browseable = yes writable = yes path =

I've got a problem I hope someone can help with. We have a directory on a redhat box where we want anyone who creates a file (usually done with samba access) to have that file be created as if by a special "user" and group.. Now in the smb.privateshares config file we specify force user and force group.. However when we create a file in this directory it shows it being owned by the

Hi all! I know this is quite offtopic, but I found nothing in google nor in the net-snmp mailing list, and I know there''s a lot of people here graphing with snmp+rrdtool. I installed net-snmp 5.1.2-6.1 in Debian to produce graphs for some ethernet interfaces. It seems it''s not reporting correct values for them. Here''s my snmpd.conf (very simple) and the output from the

You right. I joined my Linux box into Windows domain.Of course. I attached my "smb.conf". Can you see it? On Saturday, December 27, 2014 3:36 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: On 27/12/14 06:44, Jason Long wrote: > Thank you so much. > No, I'm not. I joined my linux to Windows domain because of AD. I can define some users in my Linux

Thank you so much.I changed my "smb.conf" and "password-auth-ac". I attached two file for you and you can see them. My problem not solved :( and login windows showed and not accept my username and password, I attached it too.?I paste my "fstab" file here and as you see the "acl" is enabled for "root" : ## /etc/fstab# Created by anaconda on Wed Dec