similar to: Visualizing a call graph

I think this feature may be realesed more easly(because wine get all 3d-calls) than other programs like vrizer (now vrizer is dead).

Hi, I started to work with llvm and liked the CFG dotty printer a lot. However there was none for the dominance trees. I implemented dotty printing for dominance trees and introduced these new flags: -dot-dom : Print dominance tree of function to 'dot' file -dot-dom-only : Print dominance tree of function to 'dot' file (with no function

Hi, It's changed a few times over the last year. I believe xdg-open spawns whichever application your desktop environment would use to open the file so you should be able to tell it to use dotty. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev Sent: 11 August 2015 00:30 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [llvm-dev] Fwd: [LLVMdev]

On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 00:20 +0200, Tobias Grosser wrote: > Hi, > > I started to work with llvm and liked the CFG dotty printer a lot. > However there was none for the dominance trees. > > I implemented dotty printing for dominance trees And here is the patch. Tobi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

Hi, I'm running ubuntu 12.04 and I'm trying to use dotty, the graphs are produced but without data - there are just dots in the nodes instead of text. Does anyone else have any trouble? Cheers, sam -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/broken-dotty-tp46278.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear All, As a maintainer of large, complex packages, I can think of many places in which deconstructing assignment would simplify the code, as well as facilitate readability by breaking up larger functions into helpers, so I would be very glad to see this incorporated somehow. I think the crux of the matter is that while there is a number of ways to implement deconstructing assignment within R,

Yes, this is really a problem with the checks, not with the language. A simpler approach than your alternativeAssignment function would be simply to allow globalVariables() to be limited to a single function as the note in its help page says. This might be tedious to write by hand, but could be automated using methods like "dotify" in dotty. Duncan Murdoch On 12/03/2023 10:36

Thanks Gabriel and Kevin for your inputs, regarding your points Gabriel, I think Python and Julia do allow multiple sub-assignment, but in-line with my earlier suggestion in response to Duncan to make multiple assignment an environment-level operation (like collapse::%=% currently works), this would not be possible in R. Regarding the [a] <- coolest_function() syntax, yeah it would mean do

On 15/08/11 13:12, محمد ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻫﻠﻮﻯ wrote: > How do I enable the assertions when building ? > I am using 2.9, the current version, and when I use the standard build llc does > not give me the view-*-dags options. Configure with --enable-assertions Ciao, Duncan. > > -Omer > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr > <mailto:baldrick at

On 12/03/2023 6:07 a.m., Sebastian Martin Krantz wrote: > Thinking more about this, and seeing Kevins examples at > https://github.com/kevinushey/dotty > <https://github.com/kevinushey/dotty>, I think this is the most R-like > way of doing it, > with an additional benefit as it would allow to introduce the useful > data.table semantics DT[, .(a = b, c, d)] to more

Kevins package is very nice as a proof of concept, no doubt about that, but it is not at the level of performance or convenience that a native R implementation would offer. I would probably not use it to translate matlab routines into R packages placed on CRAN, because it?s an additional dependency, I have a performance burden in every iteration, and utils::globalVariables() is everything but

Tobias Grosser wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 00:20 +0200, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I started to work with llvm and liked the CFG dotty printer a lot. >> However there was none for the dominance trees. >> >> I implemented dotty printing for dominance trees Great! I'm a huge fan of graphviz integration in the compiler. > And here is the

Matt, This seems to generate llvm.my_intrinsic just fine in the DAG, so no DAG errors; however, it won't match. For example, if I call the intrinsic from C, the DAG node looks to be named the same in dotty file but it won't match... am I missing something? I've done it exactly the way it was done above. The DAG looks great but it won't match. Did I miss something? Thanks.

After enabling assertions and recompilation I still get this error. ~/bin/llvm$ llc -view-isel-dags t3.bc llc: Unknown command line argument '-view-isel-dags'. Try: 'llc -help' llc: Did you mean '-fast-isel-abort'? and I see the view-edge bundles option but get the following error. ~/bin/llvm$ llc -view-edge-bundles t3.bc Writing

The diff is not only the && and || but also the leading !: diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp index 58f029fbe9fc..7ee06fc153b2 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::CodeGenAndEmitDAG() {

hi eli, i delete the cache of cmake, and reconfigure the project, but HAVE_GRAPHVIZ still undefine. do you know what i should do? thanks very much. regards --ether On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:32 PM, ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: >> hi all, >> >> i just install gv and

hi all, i just install gv and dotty for windows, but i cant see any way to configure it using cmake. is Viewing graphs under windows supported? and how could i configure it? regards --ether

I believe it's "Dotty", I simply output "opt -view-regions-only". On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Schuster, Vince J <vinces at lanl.gov> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > wrt your llvm email. What do you use to get a visual > display of your .obj file? > > thanks, > Vince Schuster > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 >

Is this option currently mandatory? If so, why? If not, I'm not sure what's been added that I need to do differently. -view-isel-dags opened just fine in dotty in 3.4 and now this does nothing without the filter-view-dags 'option' and now has a different priority program list or something. I'm just curious why this option should be mandatory? Thanks. -------------- next part

Hi, Here is a little patch to have cmake detect dotty, and if this was the case, update the HAVE_DOTTY and LLVM_PATH_DOTTY defines in include/llvm/Config/config.h. This should apply cleanly on TOT. Best regards, -- Arnaud de Grandmaison -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: