similar to: [Bug 1730] New: nft does not handle IPv6 addresses with embedded IPv4 addresses

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1435 Bug ID: 1435 Summary: segfault when using iptables-nft and iptables-legacy inside a container Product: libnftnl Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1725 Bug ID: 1725 Summary: Updating and destroying set elements Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: All OS: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1728 Bug ID: 1728 Summary: Regression: iptables lock is now waited for without --wait Product: iptables Version: 1.8.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: unknown

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918 Summary: Ranges and comparat Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy: anarey at gmail.com

Hello list, I'm having DTMF-troubles with a Snom phone. I want to know if it's the Snom or Asterisk that makes the trouble. I'm playing a prompt, then make a choice for "2" : [Jan 5 17:06:38] VERBOSE[29172] file.c: [Jan 5 17:06:38] -- <SIP/test1-00000701> Playing '/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/vprompts/109001/prompt5040.slin' (language 'nl') [Jan

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 Bug ID: 1742 Summary: using nfqueue breaks SCTP connection (tracking) Product: libnetfilter_queue Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: libnetfilter_queue Assignee:

Hello, I am starting the system container without "/" directory So that it can share the host /bin /sbin /lib and /lib64 and i have sepeartely mounted /var, /etc and /usr directory for the container Below is xml file <domain type='lxc'> <name>test6</name> <memory>102400</memory> <os> <type>exe</type>

Hello list, using Asterisk 1.4.30. I want to set the SIP-header Remote-Party-ID to display the name of the calling party on my phone in stead of the number. This is the dialplan : exten => 10,1,NoOp() exten => 10,n,SIPAddHeader(Remote-Party-ID: "eric" <sip:10 at 192.168.1.150>;party=called ) exten => 10,n,Dial(SIP/test2) This is what the CLI shows : /[Jul 12

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476 Bug ID: 1476 Summary: xtables-monitor --trace segfaults running inside a container Product: bugzilla Version: other Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: netfilter

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=949 Summary: icmpv6 id option doesn't work Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Reduction Not Captured By LLVM CODE_1 ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- #include <stdio.h> int main() { int sum[1000]={1,2,3,4}; for (int i=1;i<1000;i++) { sum[0] +=sum[i-1]; } }

Hello, I have two servers where I can push VMs from one to the other by issuing the command virsh migrate --live --persistent --copy-storage-all --verbose \ test6 qemu+ssh://kvmhost2/system on kvmhost1. I can get the VM back by issuing the equivalent command on kvmhost2: virsh migrate --live --persistent --copy-storage-all --verbose \ test6 qemu+ssh://kvmhost1/system virsh

Hi R help, I run my data in nnet with skip layer, factor response (with 0 & 1 values) and explicitly put softmax=T to compare the result of the default nnet with no softmax specification. I assume this should give me the same result. I got the result the default one, but not the softmax version and I got the error message that I did not quite understand. test6.nn.skipT.softm.Yfac <-

Hello, Limiting the call duration with the L-option of the Dial()-command is working fine, however the announcement is not played. Dialplan : exten => _367,n,Set(LIMIT_PLAYAUDIO_CALLER=yes) exten => _367,n,Dial(SIP/test6,,L(11000,5000,5000)) The call lasts for 11 seconds, but 5 minutes before time runs out an announcement should come. I hear no announcement, not on caller-side nor on

Hi R users, Could anyone let me know how to export a paired t-test output table (see below) to an excel file? Jason, with(score2,pairwise.t.test(values,ind, + p.adjust.method="holm", paired=T)) Pairwise comparisons using paired t tests data: values and ind test1 test2 test3 test4 test5 test6 test1 1.0000 - - -

Hello, I have two servers where I can push VMs from one to the other by issuing the command virsh migrate --live --persistent --copy-storage-all --verbose \ test6 qemu+ssh://kvmhost2/system on kvmhost1. I can get the VM back by issuing the equivalent command on kvmhost2: virsh migrate --live --persistent --copy-storage-all --verbose \ test6 qemu+ssh://kvmhost1/system After

Hi, Following is excerpted from dynamic-vector-gep.ll. The resulting "extractelement" seems to always return 0.0f regardless the value idx1 and idx2 is holding. Am I missing something here or there is something fishy take place? Thanks Shuxin 101 ; CHECK: test6 102 ; CHECK: insertelement <4 x float> zeroinitializer, float 1.000000e+00, i32 %idx1 103 ; CHECK:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1449 Bug ID: 1449 Summary: nft ipv4 set with interval issue Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

On 11/11/2015 8:53 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > SROA seems to be doing a number of things here. What about if we prevented SROA from generating multiple slices splitting volatile accesses? There might be a significant difference between that and something like this test (test/Transforms/SROA/basictest.ll): > > define i32 @test6() { > ; CHECK-LABEL: @test6( > ; CHECK: alloca i32 >

Hi Shuxin I think i might have written that test. And yeah, no matter what values you get you’ll get a 0.0. Its probably a bad test case, but i can’t remember if it exposed a bug in this form or not. Since writing it Chandler rewrote SROA anyway so the original bug is long gone. Thanks, Pete On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > >