similar to: Cleanup after demoting an offline DC

I started with two Samba DCs running 4.14.7 (camus and cristal). I am replacing them with newer OS and Samba versions with an eye to get everything current. At this point, I have taken the baby step of adding a third server running 4.15.13 (frangelico). I have added the new system to the domain, it is participating as a DC and replication is working nicely. After a few days, I transferred all the

I have recently added a DC to my AD - Former DC was Samba 4.1.6, new DC is 4.3.11 (latest supported by Ubuntu). There's also a Window 2008 server I had tried to join as an AD - that server, wouldn't completely join and replicate to the 4.1.6 samba AD, and now it will not Un-join the AD "domain" either via dcpromo. This brings me to my actual question - Now that I have

Thanks for that. But how can it be related to the OS whether it is Rhel9 or Rhel8. It's failing in either case with versions above 4.13.13 (must be that number 13...) Br ________________________________ Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> im Auftrag von Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Gesendet: Mittwoch, Dezember 11, 2024 7:55:50 PM An: samba at

Hello, I am in the process of upgrading one single DC (internal DNS) to 4.8.12. I have followed the procedure of adding a new DC, transfert FSMO roles and demote the old DC. Everything gone right (except at the tranfert FSMO step where I faced the problem described here https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-August/210140.html , this bug subsists in 4.8.12 , maybe it has been fixed in later

I followed the "Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC" on the Samba Wiki. After demoting the online controller and receiving a "successful" notation I scrolled down to the "Verifying The Demotion" via the listed Windows RSAT. The controller was not listed as a domain controller any more. Only the remaining two DC's appeared. Great! The "Active Directory Sites and

On 11/26/2015 10:35 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> ANYWAYS, I would like to approach from a different direction: >>> >>> If my first DC is offline, a ping on any of my domain machines takes >>> 5+ seconds to resolve. I figure that my logon problems reflect >>> multiple such timeouts during the logon process accumulating to a >>> total

Thanks for your answer Rowland. That's bad news since the new DC is now in production and I can't take the risk to break anything. Reply inline : > -----Message d'origine----- > De?: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> De la part de Rowland penny > via samba > Envoy??: lundi 5 ao?t 2019 11:18 > ??: samba at lists.samba.org > Objet?: Re: [Samba] DNS state

Hi Mickey, Am 06.04.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Mickey Bankhead via samba: > I thought I would shut down the old 2k8 broken DC and the 4.1.6 DC > servers, and then demote these "offline" servers? BUT The samba.org howto > for demoting offline servers > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC > says if you are running older than samba 4.4, then upgrade samba

Following: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC i've demoted and removed a DC. Seems all went as expected: root at vdcud1:~# samba-tool domain demote --server=vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it -U gaio Using vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it as partner server for the demotion Password for [LNFFVG\gaio]: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server vdcsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it to synchronize

Hi, I demoted my PDC (DC1) forcefully, because replication (among others) wasn't working anymore due to hard disk failure and I was afraid of spending a lot of time on nothing. With DC1 offline I seized the FSMO roles on DC2 (4.2.5), restarted Samba, and found errors in the samba log due to the missing DC1. I removed the two DNS entries created according to this site:

On 11/20/2015 7:40 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 20.11.2015 um 11:54 schrieb mathias dufresne: >> Hi Ole, >> >> I'm still not answering your issue but I come back to speak about >> TTL. Perhaps someone would be able to bring us some light on that. >> >> This morning I'm trying to reproduce the way I do broke my test AD >> domain. This

Mandi! Denis Cardon via samba In chel di` si favelave... > what version of Samba are you running? Recent versions do a much better job > at DNS cleaning during demote. Eh, domain controllers are still on samba 4.5... > I also advise you to run the demote on another DC than the one you are > demoting (samba-tool doamin demote --remove-other-dead-server=xxxxx). > Running a

Thank you for hint to this VBS script. In fact I alraedy saw it but I'm not too confident in my VB knowledge, so I didn't use that script, prefering rely on Samba command and shell scripts to work around issues. You spoke about SOA record which wasn't changed, same here. There is another DNS record I had to change: _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.samba.domain.tld. I spoke about removing

Hi, I played with demote recently on a test AD domain composed with Samba version 4.3.0 and 4.3.1. I demoted all version 4.3.0. I was facing same issue as you. I written long mails here to explain how I managed that. My DNS looks clear now. Today I played with AD sites and I found in default sites all demoted DC. They weren't removed from DNS DB nor here. For now I have no idea how to get

On 10/30/2015 9:19 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 30.10.2015 um 13:33 schrieb James: >> On 10/29/2015 9:56 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.10.2015 um 14:37 schrieb James: >>>> On 10/29/2015 9:15 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 29.10.2015 um 13:54 schrieb mathias dufresne:

On 10/29/2015 9:56 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 29.10.2015 um 14:37 schrieb James: >> On 10/29/2015 9:15 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.10.2015 um 13:54 schrieb mathias dufresne: >>>> Thank you for hint to this VBS script. In fact I alraedy saw it but >>>> I'm not >>>> too confident in my VB knowledge, so

On 10/29/2015 9:15 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 29.10.2015 um 13:54 schrieb mathias dufresne: >> Thank you for hint to this VBS script. In fact I alraedy saw it but >> I'm not >> too confident in my VB knowledge, so I didn't use that script, prefering >> rely on Samba command and shell scripts to work around issues. >> >> You spoke about SOA

Am 17.12.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 17/12/15 14:56, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >> >> Am 17.12.2015 um 15:33 schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 17/12/15 13:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>> Rowland, thank you, but before we do that: >>>> >>>> - what now with the 'gc' record? 2nd DC yes or no? >>> >>> Which one

On 02/12/15 10:31, mj wrote: >> I can find on the internet multiple instances of 'every DC running dns >> should have a SOA record', but I cannot find any concrete examples of an >> ldif that shows this. Does each DC have a separate SOA record in AD, or >> is there just one SOA record and the DC just claims to be the SOA, or is >> there just one SOA record

I’m looking to replace a DC within a small network by adding a new DC and transferring FMSO roles, then demoting the old DC (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC). I am able to successfully deploy the new DC following directions in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory. However, I am struggling with ID mappings – I’m not really