similar to: The child be reclaimed?

Hi folks, I have an issue at a weird confluence of macOS Mojave's "nsmb" client, Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop, and Samba 4.7.6-Ubuntu. Since I don't have much control over Apple or Adobe software, I'm hoping there's some smb.conf magic (or other sage advice) that might help me out of this jam. For reference, Samba is configured for SMB2-only access (i.e. durable file

The original plan was to have a background thread doing the reclaim. However that cannot work given the design of filters, because a background thread cannot access the next_ops struct which is only available during requests. Therefore we spread the work over the request threads. Each blk_* function checks whether there is work to do, and if there is will reclaim up to two blocks from the cache

Hi, I am not sure if this is a bug and I apologize if it is something I didn't read carefully in the R extension manual. My initial search on the R help and R devel list archive didn't find useful information. I am using .Call (as written in the R extension manual) for the C code and have found that the .Call didn't release the memory claimed by allocVector. Even after applying

Hi, I am not sure if this is a bug and I apologize if it is something I didn't read carefully in the R extension manual. My initial search on the R help and R devel list archive didn't find useful information. I am using .Call (as written in the R extension manual) for the C code and have found that the .Call didn't release the memory claimed by allocVector. Even after applying

The original plan was to have a background thread doing the reclaim. However that cannot work given the design of filters, because a background thread cannot access the next_ops struct which is only available during requests. Therefore we spread the work over the request threads. Each blk_* function checks whether there is work to do, and if there is will reclaim up to two blocks from the cache

Dear LLVM developers, Recently I want to try the pass '-loop-unroll-and-jam' to observe how the IR is transformed, but I don't see the IR changed after doing the following steps. Here are the details for preparing my experiment and I have tried the LLVM 6, 7 and 8: 1) Simple 2D array source code (loop.c) is given ``` #define M 32768 #define N 32768 double a[M][N], b[M][N],

Hi all. I have a question regarding privsep. Firstly, the following is my understanding of what happens when privsep is enabled: The sshd daemon is running as root listing on 22(a). When a connection is accepted, a child is forked to handle the connection, this child becomes the monitor(b). The monitor forks the pre-auth privsep slave(c), which sheds it privs and hides in its chroot jail.

For FreeBSD 4.7 I've discovered the cause of the deadlock, but I can't figure out how to fix it. See below for traces. If the vnode limit has been reached, the vnlru process is kicked and the requestor goes to sleep to wait for the vnlru process to signal that vnodes are available (10% of the vnodes need to be freed). Under our test, none of the nodes meet the criteria for freeing,

> I studied some a few years ago and concluded that it > was not worth the trouble. "Boost C++ Libraries" uses perforce jam ( in their case it's modified jam: bjam http://www.boost.org/doc/tools/jam/index.html ). Jam works well with massive structures of autonomous projects that constitute a collection of libraries and must be built on multiple platforms and with different

On 1/3/19 6:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > The original plan was to have a background thread doing the reclaim. > However that cannot work given the design of filters, because a > background thread cannot access the next_ops struct which is only > available during requests. > > Therefore we spread the work over the request threads. Each blk_* > function checks whether

On ???, 16 ??? 2024, Michal Sekletar wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am trying to adjust the systemd-logind classification of the SSH > session opened by Ansible client. By default the SSH session created > by Ansible client is Class=user and Type=tty in systemd-logind. > pam_systemd.so allows users to change this default via the environment > variables XDG_SESSION_CLASS and

When trying to build Boost using LLVM, I had this error: " error: ISO C++17 does not allow 'register' storage class specifier [-Wregister] " I attached the project-config.jam file I used to this message. Someone please help me out (if there's someone on here who can). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, If we add multiple loop passes to the pass manager in PassManagerBuilder.cpp consecutively without any func/module pass in between, I used to think they would belong to the same loop pass manager. But it does not seem to be the case. For example for this code snippet PM.add(createIndVarSimplifyPass()); // Canonicalize indvars MPM.add(createLoopIdiomPass()); //

I use ssh tunnels extensively. recently I upgraded my linux kernel from 2.6.18 to 2.6.37 and a problem with tunnels has resulted. prior to the upgrade use of ssh tunN devices was rock solid. the problem manifests as the tunnel from the initiator end ceasing to transfer data to the remote after a quantity of data is sent. it is necessary to create a new tunnel after destroying the old to get

I tried to run dovecot 1.0 built by myself but encountered the above problem. See the error traces below. First of all, the password and user are correct, as it worked with the 0.99 rpm version of dovecot. I also hand verified with ssh. I also attached the dovecot config file below. Any ideas? Jun fetchmail output on client: ------------------------------------- fetchmail: POP3< +OK

Hi Ralph, Thanks for your suggestion. I have upgraded to Samba 4.1.14 (I know it's not the latest version but its the only version I could install on Gentoo at the moment). Unfortunately, my issues still persist. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- # smbclient -V Version 4.1.14 # smbtree -U AJames Enter AJames's password: WORKGROUP

Hello, We are currently evaluating LLVM as a compiler technology against Open64 and have a few questions regarding its currently status with respect to optimizations in particular. Control flow is often expensive on the architectures we are considering and as such loop optimizations, e.g. unroll and jam, can play an important role. For example, consider the following program int

When using multicore-forking of the parallel package, is it possible for a child process to know that it is a fork? Something like: parallel::mclapply(1:10, FUN = function(i) { test_if_running_in_a_fork() }) I'm looking into ways to protect against further parallel processes (including threads), which not necessarily are created via the parallel:mc* API, are being spawned off recursively.

<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt" ><div dir="ltr" ><font face="AppleSystemUIFont" size="3" >LoopUnrollAndJamPass is currently a loop pass. It is added in a LPM with only itself.</font><br><font face="AppleSystemUIFont"

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > When using multicore-forking of the parallel package, is it possible > for a child process to know that it is a fork? R internally uses R_isForkedChild to prevent certain operations within the fork. However I don't think this is exported anywhere. You could do something like: extern