similar to: ssh keys hostname VS fqdn - offends?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "ssh keys hostname VS fqdn - offends?"

2024 Jan 01
1
ssh keys hostname VS fqdn - offends?
--On Monday, January 01, 2024 1:01 PM +0100 lejeczek via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > -> $ ssh box5.proxmox.mine hostname -i > 10.3.1.78 > > -> $ ssh box5 hostname -i > Warning: the RSA host key for 'box5' differs from the key for the IP > address '10.3.1.78' > Offending key for IP in /root/.ssh/known_hosts:2 > Matching host key in
2017 May 15
5
Golang CertChecker hostname validation differs to OpenSSH
Hi all, Last week I noticed that the CertChecker in the Go implementation of x/crypto/ssh seems to be doing host principal validation incorrectly and filed the following bug: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/20273 By default they are looking for a principal named "host:port" inside of the certificate presented by the server, instead of just looking for the host as I believe OpenSSH
2020 Sep 16
2
ssh-ed25519 and ecdsa-sha2-nistp256 host keys
Hello. I am running OpenSSH 7.9p1 on my client and server. ssh-keyscan shows the server has ssh-rsa, ssh-ed25519, and ecdsa-sha2-nistp256 host keys. My /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts file contains the server's ssh-ed25519 host key. When I try to SSH to the server I get this error: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED!
2002 Jan 13
7
Public storage for public keys
This question should be asked before, but I fail to find the discussion. What options can be used for storing host/users pubkeys in a publically available places? I know openssh currently provide option except if /etc/ssh_known_hosts and ~/.ssh/known_hosts. But what about many machines? Think of e.g. pgp keyservers. Note that pgp keyservers isn't a good solution *always*. The best one
2006 Aug 04
1
RC5 Outlook POP3 problem
We have been using dovecot v1.0 alpha3 for almost 1 year for our mail hosting. It was running great until more accounts added to the hosting. I have been trying to upgrade it to v1.0 rc5 and we have found that the RC5 has problem with Outlook (Express) with POP accounts. We are getting error with POP3 on Outlook Express: Your server has unexpectedly terminated the connection. Possible causes for
2003 Oct 20
12
[Bug 747] host authentication requires RSA1 keys
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747 Summary: host authentication requires RSA1 keys Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:
2010 Sep 23
1
Auth error
Hello, I'm testing Dovecot 2.0. I plan to use Dovecot 2.0 with thousands of domains per server. My user base is under virtual MySQL. I my tests, the authentication fails intermittently, and I could not find what's wrong. Can anyone help me? ################################################################################ Sep 22 16:31:16 box5 dovecot: last message repeated 9 times Sep 22
2010 Mar 29
18
please decrypt your manuals
I. most of ssh manual and all sshd manual present server and client as one machine, called host. All files mentioned are placed on one machine. This is incorrect, and makes the explanation unclear. For example, man sshd SSH_KNOWN_HOSTS FILE FORMAT suggests to copy keys from /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key.pub into /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts, as if those files are on the same machine. II. a general
2011 Oct 03
2
sshkey resource type in Ubuntu 10.04
Hi, I''m attempting to distribute a known host ssh key (for github) to an Ubuntu 10.04 host. Puppet is distributing the key into /etc/ssh/ ssh_known_hosts as: github.com ssh-rsa [really long ssh-rsa key] However, Ubuntu seems to expect the key in this format: |1|[really long ssh-rsa key] (note all the keys in my known_hosts and ssh_known_hosts not managed by puppet are prepended with
2010 Oct 26
1
Corrupted transaction log file
Hello I run dovecot 2.0.6 on a two-machine cluster using OCFS2 as the file system. I have some error messages like these in my log: Oct 25 01:07:50 box5 dovecot: lmtp(8886, suporte=100br.com at lmtp1.prv.f1.k8.com.br): Error: Corrupted transaction log file /var/lib/imap/user/a3/suporte=100br.com/stor age/dovecot.map.index.log seq 29: Transaction log corrupted unexpectedly at 21536: Invalid size
2019 Aug 06
2
Dovecot replication and userdb "noreplicate".
On 06.08.2019 23:17, Reio Remma via dovecot wrote: > On 24.06.2019 16:25, Reio Remma wrote: >> On 24.06.2019 8:21, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> On 22.6.2019 22.00, Reio Remma via dovecot wrote: >>>> Jun 22 16:55:22 host dovecot: dsync-local(user at host.ee)<>: Error: >>>> Remote command returned error 84: ssh -i /home/vmail/.ssh/vmail.pem -l >>>>
2010 Jun 02
1
known_hosts
Is there a good reason why known_hosts stores the address of the server but not the port? This is annoying when one host is running more than one instance of openssh with different ports and different keys, or (less tractably) when a NAT in front of multiple hosts multiplexes which host is connected to by port number. I see no immediate security implication in fixing this, but am I missing
2002 Jan 07
1
Non-root hostname auth problem
All: I have a problem connecting Openssh 3.0.2p1 on Solaris 8 using hostname authentication for non-root users. When I connect to the sshd from a second machine as root it works fine using HostbasedAuthentication, but it always fails with non-root users. I suspect that I am having a permissions problem somewhere, but I'll be damned if I can figure out where. Any and all help
2013 Aug 13
2
Collector not realizing own exported resources when filtering on tags
I''m trying to create a ssh class where the /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts and /etc/ssh/shosts.equiv stays updated. The issue i''m finding is that if I include a "tag == anything" in the Collector filter, it collects all resources EXCEPT it''s own. In this case, the known_hosts and .equiv files will have all the other hostnames, but not it''s own hostname.
2024 Feb 17
1
How to remove old entries from known_hosts?
Brian Candler wrote: > Chris Green wrote: > > ... redundant ones are because I have a mixed population of > > Raspberry Pis and such on my LAN and they get rebuilt fairly > > frequently and thus, each time, get a new entry in known_hosts. > ...many useful tips... > To disable host key checking altogether for certain domains and/or networks, > you can put this in
2001 Sep 26
3
OpenSSH 2.9.9
OpenSSH 2.9.9 has just been uploaded. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH 2.9.9 fixes a weakness in the key file option handling, including source IP based access control. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol version 1.3, 1.5 and 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. This release contains many portability
2020 Sep 16
2
ssh-ed25519 and ecdsa-sha2-nistp256 host keys
Here you go: OpenSSH_7.9p1, OpenSSL 1.1.1d 10 Sep 2019 debug1: Reading configuration data /home/ryantm/.ssh/config debug1: /home/ryantm/.ssh/config line 4: Applying options for * debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 13: Applying options for * debug2: resolving "{REDACTED}" port 22 debug2: ssh_connect_direct debug1: Connecting to
2007 Apr 04
5
sshkey
Hello all, How are you using the sshkey type? Are you using it to list hosts and keys in a class that nodes include in order to manage /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts or something else? How does any of this relate to the sshrsakey and sshdsakey facts on the host? I read some stuff about this on the Virtual Resources page but it''s too vague for my simple mind and I''d be reluctant to use
2016 Sep 07
2
Question regarding Host keys.
Hi, I'm having a problem when I add "HostKeyAlgorithms +ssh-dss" to the ssh_config file the host key will always negotiate to a wrong one. In my case it will negotiate to "ecdsa-sha2-nistp256". The client was already configured with the servers rsa public key, before the change I added to the ssh_config file I could see from the debug that server and client will negotiate
2019 Jun 24
2
Dovecot replication and userdb "noreplicate".
On 24.06.2019 8:21, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 22.6.2019 22.00, Reio Remma via dovecot wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I finally took the time and spent two days to set up replication for >> my server and now I have a question or two. >> >> I initially set noreplicate userdb field to 1 for all but a test user, >> but I could still see in the logs that all mailboxes