similar to: [Bug 15546] New: disable of sorting when files to transfer is fed via --files-from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14328 Bug ID: 14328 Summary: usleep() is obsolete, use nanosleep() Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14390 Bug ID: 14390 Summary: Feature request: don't fail if using "-z" transferring to rsync complied with --with-included-zlib=no Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Hello! Problem: Outbound data goes through default interface instead of specified, causing congestion. Question: How can I instruct samba to tell Solaris to SEND data through specified network interface? Detailed: I have a solaris filesserver with two network interfaces, hme0 and hme1. I'd like NFS to use hme0 and smb hme1. I intsruct samba to only listen for connections on the

Hey all, I need to use C bindings in a pass that I am authoring (specifically, I want to use the OCaml bindings that are tied to the C bindings to author the pass). However, this requires that I link in LLVMCore to provide said bindings to my library. From what I've read, there is a known issue with linking LLVMCore into a module that is fed to opt. Namely, you get the following assertion:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14394 Bug ID: 14394 Summary: Add an option for --remove-source-files to remove files right away Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14407 Bug ID: 14407 Summary: link_stat ... failed: No such file or directory: should mention which end of the connection it is talking about Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15335 Bug ID: 15335 Summary: Environment variables in remote host's path do not resolve properly Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14463 Bug ID: 14463 Summary: rsync 3.2.2 server protocol error Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890 devzero at web.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |devzero at web.de ------- Comment #3 from devzero at web.de 2009-08-07 05:11 CST ------- wouldn`t it be better to give up on that effort

Hi Kevin, Just did: same result. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 14:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Try it without any --delete options. > > On 03/27/2015 09:31 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > > I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the

Anyone have any other ideas I could try to debug this issue? :) -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 16:02 GMT+01:00 Aron Rotteveel <rotteveel.aron at gmail.com>: > Hi Kevin, > > Just did: same result. > > -- > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > > Aron Rotteveel > > 2015-03-27 14:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Try it without any --delete options. On 03/27/2015 09:31 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the > problem still persists. > > -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > > Aron Rotteveel > > 2015-03-27 14:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net >

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14377 Bug ID: 14377 Summary: rsync rsync_xal_set lsetxattr failed invalid argument Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15393 Bug ID: 15393 Summary: rsync attempts to set extended attributes while in dry-run Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15585 Bug ID: 15585 Summary: rsync ends still with error 22 when try to deleting many files Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14529 Bug ID: 14529 Summary: Please add option to save metadata to single file to speed up backups Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

I am now running with --delete --numeric-ids --relative but the problem still persists. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 14:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Try also removing --delete-excluded. Without those two options there > should be no reason for rsync to require

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Try also removing --delete-excluded. Without those two options there should be no reason for rsync to require gigs of RAM. Well, unless the other system has rsync 2.x. On 03/27/2015 07:29 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. > > -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > >

At 17:00 19.12.2016, devzero at web.de wrote: >>http://olstrans.sourceforge.net/release/OLS2000-rsync/OLS2000-rsync.html > ><snipp> But the filename twice can happen under other circumstances; if you've seen this happen, it's almost certainly because the file changed during transfer. Rsync does no locking. Which means that: if you are modifying a file while it's

Hi there, i'm beginner in Asterisk.. I have situation: when a caller ,some SIP account on local network, dial outside number trough some Zap channel, asterisk have to automaticly transfer call to another local SIP channel....In other words, he have to change caller.. For example: I have SIP accounts 100 and 101.. WHen i call some outside number , PBX must to automatic switch the