similar to: winbind offline logon

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:18:22 +0000 bd730c5053df9efb via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all! > > As a die hard slackware user and as a part of my learning pam process > I installed debian bookworm (12.4.0) in a vm and setup a domain > member server per the instructions in the wiki trying to figure out > how debian does it so I can correct some issues I have

Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Thursday, December 28th, 2023 at 15:59, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:18:22 +0000 > bd730c5053df9efb via samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > As a die hard slackware user and as a part of my learning pam process > > I installed debian

Hi. I've set up a Samba PDC on Debian, working fine with XP Clients. I'm now trying to have a linux client join the domain. I managed to do that, but I cannot handle password expiration. When the domain pass is expired, in GDM I see a message "Your password is expired" but the user can log in anyway. I used the following guide to configure my Linux client, which is an Ubuntu

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 19:08:45 +0000 bd730c5053df9efb via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > # here are the per-package modules (the "Primary" block) > > > auth [success=2 default=ignore] pam_unix.so nullok > > > auth [success=1 default=ignore] pam_winbind.so cached_login > > > krb5_auth krb5_ccache_type=FILE

The only thing related to 'addresses' in my /etc/samba/smb.conf file is a "hosts allow": hosts allow = 192.168.3.0/24 127.1 I'm going to ignore the 'local hosts case, as if I solve the other, the localhost case may get solved by inference. I thought the 'hosts allow' would allow any host on the local 192.168.3.0/24 subnet. The hosts have no problems

When using the global options: ================================ interfaces = eth0, lo bind interfaces only = Yes hosts allow = 192.168.1. 127. ================================ and a secondary loopback address: ================================ ~ # ip addr show dev lo 3: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,10000> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet

On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:32:18 +0200 Oliver Werner <oliver.werner at kontrast.de> wrote: > the interface part is ok. eth0 has another IP as eth0:35 > > DCs show me the profiles > > unix authentication > register user session in the systemd…. > inheritable capabilities management > OLIVER WERNER > Systemadministrator > I use Devuan and I get: Kerberos

SEND: Teoman TURHAN Hi teams. I installed samba 2.0.9 on Alpha server TRU64 unix 4.0F. But I cannot configure --with-dfs because this Tru64 unix was installing chosed filesystem type UFS filesystem. but I used ./configure command and make and make install. I installed ADVFS file system 2 days ago samba 2.2.2 on TRU64 unix. but I don't live a problem. all services were running. UFS BUG

I admit theres a LOT about the windows networking I dont understand - and even though this may NOT be a SAMBA issue per se, I thought I'd post it here. Have a 400gb samba server thats been working well (am upgrading to current patches today, btw). I've got 3 Win2k workstations, on two subnets, that have drives mapped, and connect every morning on startup just fine. All the machines

Looking for a solution to this problem. I have Googled all over the place but haven't found a definitive answer. I have a Samba Server that ONCE was on a network where there was SECOND Samba Server with IP Address 192.168.20.3. Today, the FIRST server is on a network with an address range 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0 and it has no way of finding that SECOND Server 192.168.20.3. However,

Hi list,I want to make winbind kerberos ticket refresh work but I couldn't do it with configuration below: ------ smb.conf ------security = ADS workgroup = MYDOMAINrealm = MYDOMAIN.ORG log file = /var/log/samba/%m.loglog level = 6enable core files = no idmap config * : backend = tdbidmap config * : range = 3000-7999idmap config MYDOMAIN : backend = rid idmap config MYDOMAIN : range =

Hi, Semi-not new to samba, used a previous version a long time ago. I'm using samba on SuSE 9.0, samba version 'Version 2.2.8a-SuSE' 2 network cards on this machine, eth0&1. I've enabled the samba server on this machine and it is functional. However, i only want samba to serve the file system on one of the network cards and not the other. Is this just a simple

Having issues adapting our 3.4 configuration that worked very well using idmap rid in 3.3. It seems like winbind does not cache the credentials despite all of the settings being present. I can set winbind offline via smbcontrol and have it work, but if I reboot the machine (important for my laptops) off the network winbind complains that it can't find the logon server. When disconnected and

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:03:49 -0500 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 12/8/2016 12:52 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:27:20 -0500 > > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> I think I have a issue with ldconfig not finding winbind. I create > >> the sym links and

On 09/01/15 17:26, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > On 2015-01-09 10:23, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> On 09/01/15 15:47, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: >> >> On 2015-01-09 09:27, Rowland Penny wrote: >> >> On 09/01/15 15:00, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: >> On 2015-01-09 08:44, Rowland Penny wrote: W7 client "Preferred DNS server" is set

On 12/10/15 08:27, VigneshDhanraj G wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for the help. > > Yes, Joined to the domain, ftp uses pam authentication. After > upgrading samba i found ftp pam authentication not working > > /etc/pam.d/ftp contains > > #%PAM-1.0 > auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so > auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:52:45 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > > Strictly speaking, why winbind cache ''PAM'' data and not ''NSS'' > > > one (seems to me)? > > The problem is (for myself anyway), I do not understand the >

On 09/01/15 18:31, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > On 2015-01-09 11:40, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> On 09/01/15 17:26, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: >> On 2015-01-09 10:23, Rowland Penny wrote: On 09/01/15 15:47, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: On 2015-01-09 09:27, Rowland Penny wrote: On 09/01/15 15:00, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: On 2015-01-09 08:44, Rowland Penny

On 09/01/15 18:56, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > On 2015-01-09 12:45, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> On 09/01/15 18:31, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: >> On 2015-01-09 11:40, Rowland Penny wrote: On 09/01/15 17:26, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: On 2015-01-09 10:23, Rowland Penny wrote: On 09/01/15 15:47, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: On 2015-01-09 09:27, Rowland Penny

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:57:59 -0500 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 12/12/2016 3:27 PM, lingpanda101 wrote: > > On 12/11/2016 8:59 AM, Brian Candler via samba wrote: > >> On 10/12/2016 16:25, Brian Candler wrote: > >>> I think there's plenty of emphasis now, but I think there is a > >>> part which is misleading: >