similar to: kernel panic on em0/taskq

Hello, My server is experiencing occasional kernel panics when under moderate load. I'm attaching a crash dump and the dmesg output. I'm not sure how to read the kernel backtrace but it looks like the Intel NIC (em0) caused the problem. Occasionally, I used to get a "em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting" error message, but I never had a kernel panic. The problem started last

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20080812/04e0e065/attachment-0001.pgp

Why does a vlan created against em0 have a mtu of 1496. This is on 4.8-STABLE (cvsup'd this afternoon). Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Velocet Communications. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dgilbert@velocet.net | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca |

I am getting these messages every 30 seconds or so. I searched around and found a few other post about this problem with other devices, but no answers to the problem. I didn't notice any of these message until I upgrade to 4.8-RELEASE the other day. This is a dual processor machine. It happens on all my machines that have em devices, which all happen to be dual processor machines. I

Hello -STABLE@, So I've seen this situation seemingly randomly on a number of both physical 9.1 boxes as well as VMs for I would say 6-9 months at least. I finally have a physical box here that reproduces it consistently that I can reboot easily (ie; not a production/client server). No matter what I do: reboot shutdown -p shutdown -r This specific server will stop at "All buffers

Hello, I'm running FreeBSD 8.3-stable on a machine with an AMD A8-5600K cpu. tingo at kg-quiet$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-quiet.kg4.no 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #2: Fri Jan 4 19:18:15 CET 2013 root at kg-quiet.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 tingo at kg-quiet$ dmesg | grep CPU | head -1 CPU: AMD A8-5600K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics (3618.02-MHz K8-class CPU)

Hi there We have a pair of servers running FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 that act as transparent layer 7 loadbalancer (relayd) and pop/imap proxy (dovecot). Only one of them is active at a given time, it's a failover setup. From time to time the active one gets in a state in which the 'thread taskq' thread uses up 100% of one cpu on its own, like here: ---- PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE

Hi all I'm testing dovecot to migrate from a cyrus 2.2 With TB2 if I use "subscribe" dovecot crash but only if I enable a shared namespace. Without explicit namespace or only with private namespace "subscribe" works Is this a problem already fixed in 1.2.10? is it a problem of my configuration? I tried different value for location in shared namespace but without any

Hi guys. I have a dataset with 4 columns. In the first and second column I have the same qualitative variable referred to different teams of people. There are 10 teams in total and they compete against each other to perform a certain task whose result is stored in the third column for the team recorded in the first column, and in the fourth column for the team in the second column. For example,

this is 6.0-STABLE as for Mar 17. KDB: debugger backends: ddb KDB: current backend: ddb Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #2: Fri Mar 17 11:05:32 UTC 2006 vlad@host:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/DEF_WEB Timecounter

I''ve recently re-installed an X4500 running Nevada b109 and have been experiencing ZFS lock ups regularly (perhaps once every 2-3 days). The machine is a backup server and receives hourly ZFS snapshots from another thumper - as such, the amount of zfs activity tends to be reasonably high. After about 48 - 72 hours, the file system seems to lock up and I''m unable to do anything

Now at 36 hours since zdb process start and: PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP 827 root 4936M 4931M sleep 59 0 0:50:47 0.2% zdb/209 Idling at 0.2% processor for nearly the past 24 hours... feels very stuck. Thoughts on how to determine where and why? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hello list! When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK: ----- bs1% uname -a FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25 20:15:26 MSD 2008 root@bs1.sp34.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSM i386 bs1% ifconfig em0; ifconfig tap0; ifconfig bridge0 em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500

Hi, I installed Samba 4.0.13 from ports and ran.. sudo mv /usr/local/etc/samba /usr/local/etc/samba.3 sudo mv /usr/local/etc/smb.conf /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.3 sudo vi /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.3 # Add realm entry sudo mv /var/db/samba /var/db/samba.3 sudo samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/usr/local/etc/samba.3 --use-ntvfs /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.3 When I try and start I get.. sudo samba

Hi, I would like to know if there is a way to change a vector of arbitrary size to make it fits the nearest upper size multiple of a power of 2. -- Cordialy ---------------------------------------- Emmanuel POIZOT Cnam/Intechmer Digue de Collignon 50110 Tourlaville T?l : (33)(0)2 33 88 73 42 Fax : (33)(0)2 33 88 73 39 -----------------------------------------

Hi all, I moved from 8.0-RELEASE to last week's -STABLE: $ uname -v FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Thu Sep 2 16:38:02 SAST 2010 root@XXXXX:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC and all seems well except my network card is unusable. On boot up: em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.0.5> port 0x3040-0x305f mem 0xe3200000-0xe321ffff,0xe3220000-0xe3220fff irq 10 at device 25.0 on pci0 em0: Setup

Updated my Athlon-xp 6-stable system last night, got an em watchdog timeout for the first time a few hours later, during a fairly high-traffic period. System is UP but does have device apic in the config. Any chance this is the recent race condition? Workaround? ifconfig em0 down, ifconfig em0 up seemed to cure it, at least for the moment. Thanks, Barney Wolff -- Barney Wolff I never

Hi, I noticed that network connection of one of my boxes got significantly slow just after upgrading it to 8.0R. The box has an em0 (82547EI) and worked fine with 7.2R. The symptoms are: - A ping to a host on the same LAN takes 990ms RTT, it reduces gradually to around 1ms, and then it returns to around 1s. The rate was about 2ms/ping. - The response is quite slow, but no packet

I just had a quick play with gzip compression on a filesystem and the result was the machine grinding to a halt while copying some large (.wav) files to it from another filesystem in the same pool. The system became very unresponsive, taking several seconds to echo keystrokes. The box is a maxed out AMD QuadFX, so it should have plenty of grunt for this. Comments? Ian

greetings list. am serving SMB using the samba-3.0.24 package on an openbsd 4.1-release machine and am seeing really low throughput from the server, even when both the server and client are on gigabit ethernet. the maximum throughput i've been able to attain is ~6 MBps, which is pretty slow, both on 100 Mbps and 1 Gbps segments. this top speed is identical on both 100 Mbps and 1 Gbps.