similar to: AWDR Edition 2 Gripe

Hi everybody, Is there a gem or something for working directly with Subversion from a RoR app? Thanks, Tiffani A.B. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060727/26846e72/attachment-0001.html

Has anybody else had a problem with using Lightbox in their RoR apps? I include all the necessary files in application.rhtml and then attempt to use the Lightbox functionality in pages and such. Nothing happens except that a new page opens up with the link to the image I was attempting to show with Lightbox. I''ve even gone so far as to strip out everything except the necessary

Hi everybody, Does anyone have any good resources on completely understanding database relationships in general (not necessarily Rails-specific)? Thanks, Tiffani A.B. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060722/c57107fa/attachment.html

I followed the sample code in AWDR 2 like this: store_helper.rb def hidden_div_if(conditions, attributes = {}) if conditions attributes["style"] = "display:none" else attr = tag_options(attributes.stringify_keys) "<div #{attr}>" end end store.html.erb <%= hidden_div_if(@cart.items.empty?, :id => "cart") %> <%=

On Sat, 2020-10-24 at 10:22 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > Looks like we can break the lock chain by moving ttm bo's release > method out of mmap_lock, see diff below. Ah, the perfect compliment to morning java, a patchlet to wedge in and see what happens. wedge/build/boot <schlurp... ahhh> Mmm, box says no banana... a lot. [ 30.456921] ================================ [

Twice now with v4.15-rc6, my display has gone belly up. Note: swiotlb: suppress warning when __GFP_NOWARN is set v2 is applied, but I don't _think_ it was the first time it happened. [ 3729.558261] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: gr: TRAP ch 2 [00ff842000 Xorg[3413]] [ 3729.558269] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: gr: GPC0/TPC0/TEX: 80000041 [ 3729.558273] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: gr: GPC0/TPC1/TEX: 80000041 [

I know this isn''t productive, but I must say that I absolutely hate the wiki. I''ve never been able to use it for more than a couple minutes before it completely farts out. Please fix the wiki! Sincerely, Ryan Gahl Design Engineer Camtronics Medical Systems (an Emageon Company) Ryan.gahl-nlycWCgr5/vuufBYgWm87A@public.gmane.org 262-369-3251 The information transmitted

Hello, I''m working through the tutorial, and I''ve run into a little snag. In the first part of the tutorial, the destroy link is not working correctly. I can''t figure out where I goofed. Removing :confirm doesn''t seem to resolve the issue. Thanks, Randy. development.log ----->8----- Processing AdminController#destroy (for 127.0.0.1 at 2006-04-27

On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 11:01 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-10-22 07:28:20 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote: > > I've only as yet seen nouveau lockdep gripage when firing up one of my > > full distro KVM's. > > Could you please check !RT with the `threadirqs' command line option? I > don't think RT is doing here anything different (except for

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:07:13 +0200 Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 11:01 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2020-10-22 07:28:20 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > I've only as yet seen nouveau lockdep gripage when firing up one of my > > > full distro KVM's. > > > > Could you please check !RT with the `threadirqs'

Hello all, We have an application running over samba share that creates a lot of 0-length files, and eventually throws an error because one of more of the files could not be created or does not appear to be created. At the same time in the samba log there are many messages like [2015/02/02 14:02:05.545710, 0, pid=32169, class=locking]

For anyone that is interested in looking at HIP, I have posted the latest HIP build on my server: http://htt-consult.com/~rgm/hip/ You don't need the src rpm, the others will do. Since we do not have the IPsec ESP BEET mode patch (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nikander-esp-beet-mode-09.txt) for the 2.6.18 kernel (it is in the 2.6.27 kernel), we have to run HIP in userspace.

Dear R-help, Can some one explain why barplot() uses changing colors in the bars by default? I should think that most of the time when people draw barplots, they want the bars to be in the same color. (At least that's what I'd expect. The first time I used barplot() in R, I was shocked to see the colors.) As an example, one example in ?layout draws a scatterplot with histograms drawn

Dear R-help, Can some one explain why barplot() uses changing colors in the bars by default? I should think that most of the time when people draw barplots, they want the bars to be in the same color. (At least that's what I'd expect. The first time I used barplot() in R, I was shocked to see the colors.) As an example, one example in ?layout draws a scatterplot with histograms drawn

Hi people! Will this filter work? # the traffic for MAN - match IP & MARK $tc filter add dev $EXT1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle 0x1 fw u32 match ip src $IP flowid 1:B$hIP $tc filter add dev $INT1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle 0x1 fw u32 match ip dst $IP flowid 1:B$hIP # the traffic for Internet - match IP only (what is left after MAN filter) $tc filter add dev $EXT1 parent 1:

hi,? I'm working on a research project where we're looking at the changing resonances in femur bones during hip replacement operations. basically, I've got a spreadsheet with one column listing frequencies in 5Hz bands and 3 columns showing the amplitude of that frequency when the bone is loose, medium to tight (referring to the tension of the reamer/chisel creating a cavity for the

On 07/12/2018 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 12-07-18 10:52:08, Wei Wang wrote: >> On 07/12/2018 10:30 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:17 PM Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> wrote: >>>> Would it be better to remove __GFP_THISNODE? We actually want to get all >>>> the guest free pages (from all the nodes).

On Thu 12-07-18 19:34:16, Wei Wang wrote: > On 07/12/2018 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 12-07-18 10:52:08, Wei Wang wrote: > > > On 07/12/2018 10:30 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:17 PM Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> wrote: > > > > > Would it be better to remove __GFP_THISNODE? We actually want to get

LLVM Weekly - #222, Apr 2nd 2018 ================================ If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/222>. Welcome to the two hundred and twenty-second issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex

I do not know enough about cling, but I like what you describe very much, am particularly intrigued about how your approach could also be appropriated to do ahead-of-time constexpr metaprogramming as well, which also involves incrementally adding declarations to the translation unit. Dave > On Jul 9, 2020, at 11:43 PM, JF Bastien via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >