similar to: GELI partition mount on boot fails after 7.0 -> 7.1-PRERELEASE upgrade

I have a GPT formatted disk where I recently expanded the size of a partition. I used "gpart resize -i 6 ada1" first to expand the partition to use the remaining free space and then growfs to modify the FFS file system to use the full partition. This was all done in single-user mode, of course, but when I enter "exit" to bring the system up, it failed to mount /usr. This was

I just did a source upgrade from 8.2 to 8.3. System boots but has this warning: GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (mirror/gm0, MBR) Google points to issues with FreeBSD 9 and the need to migrate to GPT but I wasn't expecting this with 8.3! Are there any quick fixes to eliminate this warning or is it safe to ignore please? sudo gpart list: Geom name: mirror/gm0 modified: false state:

Hi! May anyone assist me with booting FreeBSD DomU (under Debian Dom0). Now I''m using the kernel-current, downloaded from Kip Macy site at http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/download/ The problem is that I can''t specify _any_ root, the kernel can recognize: Mount point / had 1 dangling refs Manual root filesystem specification: <fstype>:<device> Mount

Hello list, Last night one disk of my desktop machine dead causing a hard lock of the computer. It was a component of a mirror volume so it wasn't as serious as it initially looked. Unfortunately, the metadata structure of my data partition (a geom raid3 array with tree components ) seems to be corrupted by this hard lock, the following message is scrolled constantly on the screen:

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > David, > > Thanks for reviewing! > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Might be easier if these were on Phabricator, but here are some thoughts: >> >> 0001: >> This patch generally, while separated for

Might be easier if these were on Phabricator, but here are some thoughts: 0001: This patch generally, while separated for legibility, is untested & difficult to discuss in isolation. I may need to refer to the second patch in reviewing this first one. DwarfDebug.cpp: computeSizeAndOffsets: I believe this produces the wrong offset for the 3rd CU and onwards. computeSizeAndOffset

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at

hail, I have a soekris running an atom and 2GB RAM and ZFS using 7 drives, small capacity though, to test and study if I can make my home server this box and this way. It will be a simple server, three users tops. I followed the handbook and made the geli step on the disks: Geom name: label/zfs1.eli State: ACTIVE EncryptionAlgorithm: AES-XTS KeyLength: 128 Crypto: software UsedKey: 0 Flags:

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> David, >>> >>> Thanks for reviewing!

The first patch seems fine, though the comment on the modified addDIEEntry function is a bit confusing: -/// addDIEEntry - Add a DIE attribute data and value. +/// addDIEEntry - Add a DIE attribute data and value. The form should be +/// a reference form: ref1, ref2, ref4, ref8, ref_udata, ref_addr, +/// or ref_sig8. A form can be chosen inside addDIEEntry. When the comment says "The form

David, Thanks for reviewing! On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Might be easier if these were on Phabricator, but here are some thoughts: > > 0001: > This patch generally, while separated for legibility, is untested & > difficult to discuss in isolation. > I agree, this patch adds the functionality but does not use it,

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> David, >> >> Thanks for reviewing! >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Might be easier if

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at

Ping :) On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> David, >> >> Thanks for reviewing! >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Might be

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15,

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at