similar to: upgrade ununtu 20.04 -> 22.04 and samba 4.18 -> 4.19

05.12.2023 17:21, Joachim Lindenberg via samba: > I just upgraded one of my DCs ununtu 20.04 -> 22.04 and samba 4.18 -> 4.19, but the Dc is not yet working again. > > systemctl status samba-ad-dc shows: > > Dec 05 12:48:39 cobra samba[749]: [2023/12/05 12:48:39.562920, 0] ../../source4/samba/service_task.c:36(task_server_terminate) > Dec 05 12:48:39 cobra samba[749]:

It?s always recommend to demote the DC, upgrade samba, and join the DC again. Did you do it this way ? You may have a broken DC, or a broken installation. Instead of troubleshooting, which you can of course do, I?d demote (or force-demote), reinstall and re join. http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:upgrade-sama LP On 5 Dec 2023 at 15:45 +0100, Joachim Lindenberg via samba <samba at

On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:21:50 +0100 Joachim Lindenberg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I just upgraded one of my DCs ununtu 20.04 -> 22.04 and samba 4.18 -> > 4.19, but the Dc is not yet working again. How did you upgrade ? If I remember correctly, both 20.04 and 22.04 come with 4.15.13 (latest Samba version available), so could it be that the upgrade from 20.04 to

05.12.2023 17:51, Luis Peromarta via samba : > It?s always recommend to demote the DC, upgrade samba, and join the DC again. Did you do it this way ? This is rarely needed and in almost all cases is unnecessary and just an extra work. The only good reason to do that is when you upgrade a very old version of samba, skipping 5..10 or more releases in between, and even there it almost always

In addition to Rowland comment. if you still able to test it. Remove 1 setting at a time, restart and test it. Start with these, in this order. logging = syslog only prefork children = 8 I think if the logging line is removed your problem is solved. man smb.conf /logging should explain more. Because I cant/find the setting : logging = syslog only Greetz, Louis

Hello to the samba users list again. I've got an emergency here, a Samba AD DC I've got deployed has crashed again, this is the third time since 12/17/2015 that this domain has failed completely. No power outages or unexpected shutdowns, samba simply fails to start, it appears my database is yet again corrupt: [2016/03/02 11:27:17.025235, 0]

Hello Cristian, Well, nothing to say about your steps, these looks good. And lmdb could be disable in the sernet packages, cant say, i dont know. And only one DC has these problems or all? If only one DC crashed. Which DC crashes. Last added? Oldest? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Christian

On 02/03/16 20:46, IT Admin wrote: > Any further information required? Any troubleshooting steps? I need to > get this domain functional ASAP. > > Please advise. > > JS > On Mar 2, 2016 11:39 AM, "IT Admin" <it at cliffbells.com> wrote: > >> Hello to the samba users list again. I've got an emergency here, a Samba >> AD DC I've got

OS = Ubuntu 18.04 LXD container Samba version = 4.11.12 Repo = Louis' (many thanks) I recently upgraded from 4.10.14->4.10.17->4.11.12 Now the samba-ad-dc service fails with the following upon reboot: --- root at samba:~# systemctl status samba-ad-dc ? samba-ad-dc.service - Samba AD Daemon Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:55:08 -0500 Adam Tauno Williams via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > And it looks like nobody is listening on port 135 - > > [root at larkin26 ~]# netstat --listen --inet --program --numeric > Active Internet connections (only servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign > Address State PID/Program name

FreeBSD-12.1p7 jail running Samba-4.10.15 on ZFS. When I run 'samba-tool domain backup offline targetdir=/tmp' I see this: running backup on dirs: /var/db/samba4/private /var/db/samba4 /usr/local/etc Starting transaction on /var/db/samba4/private/secrets At which point samba-tool enters a permanent wait state. 86064 root 1 52 0 131M 78M wait 3 0:01 0.00%

I touched the two missing files /var/db/samba4/private/dns_update_list /var/db/samba4/private/spn_update_list And restarted the Samba44 service. This is what I see now: [2017/02/09 15:48:47.507874, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:372(binary_smbd_main) samba version 4.4.8 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2016 [2017/02/09 15:48:47.922389, 0]

I am working on a FreeBSD jail (12.1p4) using samba410. I have joined this service to our existing Samab DC DOMAIN using samba-tool domain join. This worked as far as I can tell. I have these entries in smb4.conf # BOF # Global parameters [global] netbios name = SAMBA-02 realm = BROCKLEY-2016.HARTE-LYNE.CA server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = BROCKLEY-2016

Hello. On several FreeBSD 11.2/amd64 servers, I've got a jail dedicated to running Samba as an AD DC. Some days ago I upgraded one of them from 4.8.7 to 4.8.9 and suddenly everything stopped working. Since it was a production box, I immediately restored the whole jail from a backup, with no chance to better investigate. Today, with more time, I tried on another server and again I run

On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 16:50 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams via samba wrote: > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 21:11 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:55:08 -0500 > > Adam Tauno Williams via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > And it looks like nobody is listening on port 135 - > > > [root at larkin26 ~]# netstat --listen --inet

OK I recompiled with --with-lockdir=/var/lib/samba/lock and it's now getting further... now I'm getting this when I try to start the samba daemon: Calling SPN name update script /opt/samba/sbin/winbindd: winbindd version 4.11.2 started. /opt/samba/sbin/winbindd: Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2019 /opt/samba/sbin/winbindd: Failed to create directory /var/run for pid

On Wed, July 8, 2020 04:23, Rowland penny wrote: > On 08/07/2020 08:50, Mani Wieser via samba wrote: >> >> On 07.07.2020 22:14, Mani Wieser via samba wrote: >> Found it (while having my morning walk with the dog): same as with >> SOA: this is a zone/domain thing and not record >> >> Usage: samba-tool dns delete <server> <zone> <name>

Hello, according to this: https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/merge_requests/26 samba should support DNS record scavenging is this only true for the internal DNS or also BIND? Should this work? I enabled it (dns zone scavenging = yes) to try it out and got this (didn't enable it from the DNS Manager tool as I got the error first): Jul 24 16:39:20 dc1 samba[29071]: [2019/07/24

>How did you upgrade ? >If I remember correctly, both 20.04 and 22.04 come with 4.15.13 (latest Samba version available), so could it be that the upgrade from 20.04 to >22.04 managed to install unrequired packages ? I did a do-release-upgrade first to go from 20.04 to 22.04, and then updated my /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mjt.list to go from focal/samba-4.18 to jammy/samba-4.19. I also

On 2019/02/14 21:12, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:14:19 +0200 > Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi there >> >> I have migrated from an older version of Samba DC to Samba 4.9.4 AD. >> Running Centos 7. One server with everything on...  (AD and file >> server) Bind 9.9.4 >> >> Built from