similar to: Meaning of the engines in paramaters of nouveau module

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Meaning of the engines in paramaters of nouveau module"

2023 Dec 05
1
Meaning of the engines in paramaters of nouveau module
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 05:04, Paul Dufresne <dufresnep at zoho.com> wrote: > > In https://nouveau.freedesktop.org/KernelModuleParameters.html, there is: > Here is a list of engines: > DEVICE > DMAOBJ > PBSP > PCE0 > PCE1 > PCE2 > PCRYPT > PDISP > PFIFO > PGRAPH > PMPEG > PPM > PPPP > PVP
2020 Oct 30
6
[PATCH 0/5] Improve Robust Channel (RC) recovery for Turing
This is an initial series of patches to improve channel recovery on Turing GPUs with the goal of improving reliability enough to eventually enable SVM for Turing. It's likely follow up patches will be required to fully address problems with less trivial workloads than what I have been able to test thus far. This series primarily addresses a number of hardware changes to interrupt layout and
2016 Feb 25
0
[PATCH] fifo/gk104: fix chid bit mask
From: Xia Yang <xiay at nvidia.com> Fix the channel id bit mask in FIFO schedule timeout error handling. FIFO_ENGINE_STATUS_NEXT_ID is bit 27:16 thus 0x0fff0000. FIFO_ENGINE_STATUS_ID is bit 11:0 thus 0x00000fff. Signed-off-by: Xia Yang <xiay at nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c | 4 ++-- 1 file
2015 Aug 31
8
[RFC PATCH v2 0/5] More explicit pushbuf error handling
Hi there, Resending these now that they've had some more polish and testing, and I heard that Ben's vacation is over :-) These patches work as a starting point for more explicit error mechanisms and better robustness. At the moment, when a job hangs or faults, it seems that nouveau doesn't quite know how to handle the situation and often results in a hang. Some of these situations
2012 Dec 05
2
[RFC PATCH] drm/nouveau: report channel owner in error messages
Full piglit run with this patch: http://people.freedesktop.org/~mslusarz/chan_owners.txt This patch covers only a small subset of all error messages, so: Not-yet-signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> Comments? Ideas? (This commit depends on this one: http://people.freedesktop.org/~mslusarz/0001-drm-nouveau-split-fifo-interrupt-handler.patch ) ---
2020 Aug 24
2
nouveau PUSHBUFFER_ERR on 5.9.0-rc2-next-20200824
Since upgrading to linux-next based on 5.9.0-rc1 and 5.9.0-rc2 I have had my mouse pointer disappear soon after logging in, and I have observed the system freezing temporarily when clicking on objects and when typing text. I have also found records of push buffer errors in dmesg output: [ 6625.450394] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: ERROR 1 [PUSHBUFFER_ERR] 02 [] chid 0 mthd 0000 data 00000400 I
2018 May 27
1
[PATCH][next] drm/nouveau/disp: avoid potential overflow on shift of int value
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> The constant values being shifted are 32 bit integers and may potentially overflow on the shift. Avoid this potential overflow by making them unsigned long long values before the shift. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1469383, 1469400 ("Unintentional integer overflow") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at
2017 Feb 02
1
HP Zbook17 Dock and UEFI conflict with GK107GLM aka Quadro K1100M
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Phil Turmel <philip at turmel.org> wrote: > On 02/02/2017 05:01 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >> Note that a lot of this stuff has been redone for kernel 4.10 to >> conform to atomic modesetting. I wouldn't be surprised if that >> jiggers things around enough to fix your issue. But perhaps not. >> Worth a shot. [As an aside, this
2013 Sep 02
2
[PATCH] drm/nv84-: write fence value on exit, and restore value on init.
This increases the chance slightly that recovery from lockup can happen succesfully. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv84_fence.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv84_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv84_fence.c index 2cf0ade..daf4b18 100644 ---
2012 Aug 19
1
[PATCH 09/10] drm/nv50/evo: store iomem pointer in properly typed field
Abuse of function pointer was noticed by sparse. Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_evo.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_evo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_evo.c index 0f53416..0483cbd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_evo.c +++
2014 Sep 22
2
[PATCH] drm/nv84+: fix fence context seqno's
This fixes a regression introduced by "drm/nouveau: rework to new fence interface" (commit 29ba89b2371d466). The fence sequence should not be reset after creation, the old value is used instead. On destruction the final value is written, to prevent another source of accidental wraparound in case of a channel being destroyed after a hang, and unblocking any other channel that may wait on
2018 Jun 26
1
[bug report] drm/nouveau/disp/nv50-: add channel interfaces to control error interrupts
Hello Ben Skeggs, The patch a9c44a88ca2f: "drm/nouveau/disp/nv50-: add channel interfaces to control error interrupts" from May 8, 2018, leads to the following static checker warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/channv50.c:169 nv50_disp_chan_intr() warn: should '65537 << chan->chid.user' be a 64 bit type?
2018 Jul 03
1
[bug report] drm/nouveau/disp/nv50-: add channel interfaces to control error interrupts
Hello Ben Skeggs, The patch a9c44a88ca2f: "drm/nouveau/disp/nv50-: add channel interfaces to control error interrupts" from May 8, 2018, leads to the following static checker warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/changf119.c:55 gf119_disp_chan_intr() warn: should '1 << chan->chid.user' be a 64 bit type?
2015 Nov 16
1
[PATCH] fifo/gk104: fix engine status register offset
The offset should be 8 on Kepler and later. Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Hi, According to the header[1] the offset for engine status register is 8. [1] https://github.com/kfractal/nouveau/blob/hwref/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/hwref/gk104/fifo.h Thanks, Vince diff --git
2018 Mar 30
1
[Bug 105813] New: GT710 locks up X and spams logs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105813 Bug ID: 105813 Summary: GT710 locks up X and spams logs Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at
2017 Feb 19
8
[Bug 99858] New: disp: ERROR 4 [INVALID_VALUE] 84 chid 0 mthd 0828 data 000099bb
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99858 Bug ID: 99858 Summary: disp: ERROR 4 [INVALID_VALUE] 84 [] chid 0 mthd 0828 data 000099bb Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium
2014 Jan 22
7
[Bug 73924] New: E[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] chid 0 mthd 0x0080 data 0x00000000 0x00055080
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73924 Priority: medium Bug ID: 73924 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: E[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] chid 0 mthd 0x0080 data 0x00000000 0x00055080 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All
2014 Feb 06
13
[Bug 74613] New: [v3.14-rc1] [nv34] nouveau: get 0x10000000 put 0x0000ed30 state 0xc0000000 (err: MEM_FAULT) push 0x00000000
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74613 Priority: medium Bug ID: 74613 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [v3.14-rc1] [nv34] nouveau: get 0x10000000 put 0x0000ed30 state 0xc0000000 (err: MEM_FAULT) push 0x00000000 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal
2014 Dec 18
13
[Bug 87436] New: INVALID_STATE [UNK05] chid 0 mthd 0x0080 data 0x00000000
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87436 Bug ID: 87436 Summary: INVALID_STATE [UNK05] chid 0 mthd 0x0080 data 0x00000000 Product: xorg Version: 7.7 (2012.06) Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau
2017 Jul 28
1
Error in `row.names<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`, value = c("1.9", "1.9", "1.9", : duplicate 'row.names' are not allowed
Hi, Can someone explain this error below, I don't understand why the 2 int columns are associated to make a row name > horse1.data<-read.csv("cte2.csv", header=TRUE, sep=";") > h1.dat<-mlogit.data(data=horse1.data,choice="win",chid.var="raceid",alt.var="nbChev",shape="long") Error in `row.names<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`,