similar to: Problem with mod_fcgid on AMD64

No more long delays because every dispatch.fcgi got killed for reaching max idle time. mod_fcgid is a GPL, binary-compatible alternative to mod_fastcgi. mod_fcgid is recommended over mod_fastcgi when using Apache2. This release gains a feature that many on Apache2 has been waiting for: DefaultMinClassProcessCount(default 3). Idle fastcgi will not be killed if their count is less than

Hello everyone, I''m having some trouble hosting using mod_fcgid. If I run ruby -d dispatch.rb I get the error: Exception `NameError'' at ./../config/boot.rb:14 - uninitialized constant Rails Any ideas on how to fix this? The weird thing is that running it with webrick works just fine. I tried setting the GEM_HOME environment variable in my environment.rb, but I started to get

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:3308 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:3308 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 40e654de557229bc3157fa5a96b965295abf8682f1877a3fdfbac129a1cc53d7 mod_fcgid-2.3.9-4.el7_4.1.x86_64.rpm Source:

I have posted this before with not much response so I am posing the question again. Is there a solution for this very apparent issue with mod_fcgid that the "First connection is incredibly slow". It seems its b/c mod_fcgid doesnt keep at least 1 persistent connection around that this first connection needs to start up and then every other request is fast. Is there a solution to this?

Hi, Have been pulling out my hair for the last few days wondering what I''m going to deploy my site onto. I currently have FreeBSD 4.7, Apache 1.3.3, PHP 4 and MySQL 4 running a year-old PHP site. Dated stuff I know! The new version of the site will be entirely Ruby on Rails, and I am wondering what order I should be doing things in terms of upgrades and installation. I want to be

Hello, I''m using rails on apache2 with mod_fcgid and I can''t seem to set the RAILS_ENV properly. I have dev & production vhosts and would like to set the environment from within apache rather than globally via fcgid.conf, and I thought this might work from within the relevant vhost: DefaultInitEnv RAILS_ENV production but it seems to do nothing... Does anyone know the

anyone ever try to test between mod_ruby and mod_fcgid ? Artit S. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, Running apache 2.x with mod_fcgid as recommended. My question is there seems to be no "per rails instance" configuration which is fine however is there a fix for this common issue of the "first request is always really slow". I am finding if nobody hits my site for a little while then the first request hangs and then all is normal. Should i raise the timeout for

Hi There, Every now and then, and recently more and more we get a "503 server temporarily unavailable" error from our rails app. We are running Rails 1.0 with mod_fcgid in Apache 2.0.54 on Debian The thing is I don''t think we have such a heavy load on the server, and I haven''t seen this error occur at all outside the rails app. In fact I don''t think I ever

I installed mod_fcgid yesterday. It works great for my Rails app. But in my fastcgi.crash.log is constantly get this output: [23/May/2006:08:12:07 :: 29040] starting [23/May/2006:08:18:48 :: 29040] asked to terminate immediately [23/May/2006:08:18:48 :: 29040] terminated by explicit exit [23/May/2006:08:22:03 :: 29391] starting It also shows up in the Apache error log. Is this normal? Or should I

Hi, I just installed mod_fcgid on my apache2 server. When I try to load my application I get an "Application error - Rails application failed ..." message. In my Apache2 error-log it says: Premature end of script headers dispatch.fcgi mod_fcgid process /data/www/app/dispacth.fcgi exit (communication error), terminated by calling exit(), return code 1 Any help with this would be

Hi all, I am trying to set up a dedicated Ruby on Rails server on Debian Sarge, with Apache 2 and mod_fcgid. There are 2-3 applications on this server, using virtual hosts. For now, everything works fine. However, I would like to secure this a little bit more. What I would like is to prevent one of the web apps to run a shell command to read one of the other app''s source file, or

Hello, I have a gentoo system that I am trying to remotely develop rails applications on using apache and fcgi. I created the simple hello world example from Dave Thomas'' book to test the system and I receive an "application error" when I try to go to the page. I can startup webrick and use links to view the page just fine, but nothing doing through apache. I have

Hi, Environment: Solaris 10, Orale 10g, Apache 2.2, Ruby 1.8.4, Rails 1.2.3, Ruby OCI8 1.0.0-rc2 As soon as I compiled and installed the Ruby/OCI8 interface, I got the following error from my application: ========================= [notice] mod_fcgid: call /export/home/invido/invido/portal2/public/ dispatch.fcgi with wrapper /usr/local/bin/ruby /export/home/invido/

i TRY TO CONFIGURE APACHE FOR RUBY ON RAILS ON UNIX. BY THE FOLLOWING WAYl: Install FastCGI 1. wget http://www.fastcgi.com/dist/fcgi-2.4.0.tar.gz 2. gunzip fcgi-2.4.0.tar.gz 3. tar -xvf fcgi-2.4.0.tar 4. cd fcgi-2.4.0 5. ./configure 6. make 7. make install 8. cd ../ Install mod_fcgid 1. cd ~ 2. wget http://fastcgi.coremail.cn/mod_fcgid.1.09.tar.gz 3. gunzip

On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: > I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd.? And that

> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the

On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make

On 7/21/20 9:59 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>>> that

> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>> that >>>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but