similar to: Small inconsistencies in configure checks

On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 10:24:57PM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote: > JFYI. I am not sure it's worth reporting but, when building 2.5.5 for ALT Talking of small inconsistencies, 2.5.5 isn't a Xapian version... > I noticed small inconsistencies in configure output. > > 1. xapian-binding: > > checking for /usr/bin/rdoc... no > checking for rdoc... /usr/bin/rdoc >

I'm getting compile errors because size_t is getting redefined. My "forced include file" starts with: #if BUILDING_FOR_WINDOWS #define NOMINMAX /* deal with the fact that windef.h also defines BOOL */ #define BOOL WINBOOL #include <windows.h> #include <intrin.h> #undef BOOL #endif Looking at the preprocessor expansion of a typical .cpp file, I see that crtdefs.h

Hi Reid, I copied the x64 toolsets by hand; they got installed to C:\Program Files (x86)\LLVM\tools\msbuild\x64; they just didn't get moved correctly by install.bat. I just verified that the LLVM-vs2013 toolset.props is correct. If it is a bitness problem, perhaps I'm failing to define something correctly? Regards, Eric On 9/30/14, 11:29 AM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > This looks

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > When should FLAC__HAS_X86INTRIN be defined? What header file should I be > checking for? Ah, should be checking for <x86intrin.h>. The rest seems to be coming together. Testing this now. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

I believe that we provide a definition of size_t inside the compiler itself when clang is in MSVC compatibility mode. On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Eric Mader <emader at gmx.us> wrote: > I did some more investigation of the size_t size error. I misunderstood > what was happening. It turns out that size_t is already defined before my > prefix header is included. I added the

We inject a typedef for size_t here: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp?revision=218230&view=markup#l206 The typedef type is determined by calling getSizeType(). SizeType is (relevantly) calculated in two places: X86_64 http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp?revision=218666&view=markup#l3512 X86_32

Hi, Here are 3 suggested patches. 1. Build test for cmake and run the test in gitlab-ci. 2. Disable the message box on Windows on abort that cause test hangs in CI. 3. Build time improvement by removing unnecessary includes of stdio.h in production code and change to a lighter header intrin.h -> intrin0.h (windows only). Attached screenshot of measurement but it resulted in 14%

3, no good catch attached is an updated patch //Marcus ________________________________ From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:49 To: Marcus Asteborg <xnorpx at outlook.com>; opus at xiph.org <opus at xiph.org> Subject: Re: [opus] Misc patches On 2020-06-08 01:39, Marcus Asteborg wrote: > 1. Build test for cmake and run the test in

1) in config.h FLAC__HAS_X86INTRIN macro is always defined and empty, even if x86intrin.h is not available. 2) sse_os is defined as 'yes' or 'no', but AM_CONDITIONAL tests it for 'true': AM_CONDITIONAL(FLaC__SSE_OS, test "x$sse_os" = xtrue) It seems that it should be changed to AM_CONDITIONAL(FLaC__SSE_OS, test "x$sse_os" = xyes) 3) configure

The PowerPC-related changes in FLAC 1.3.3 have caused some portability problems. libFLAC/cpu.c assumes that the <sys/auxv.h> header and the getauxval() function are universally available on PowerPC platforms. They are not. On FreeBSD/powerpc, <sys/auxv.h> is available, but getauxval() is not. Equivalent functionality is provided by elf_aux_info(). On OpenBSD/powerpc, neither is

Sorry about that, let me check the correct version for the intrin0.h include guard. //Marcus ________________________________ From: Ralph Giles <giles at thaumas.net> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 19:31 To: Marcus Asteborg <xnorpx at outlook.com>; opus at xiph.org <opus at xiph.org> Subject: Re: [opus] Misc patches Speaking of needing more complete ci feedback, the intrin0.h

Hello Erik, Thank you to work. I have not checked to build them, though, I can tell you some comments, excuse me. * General - Please post patches to cfe-commits and to llvm-commits, too. (IMHO it would not be needed to split articles apart each lists as long as each would be related.) - If you can, please attach files w/o CRLF(dos encodings), or with attached text/plain. - You may

Makes sense, yeah, trying something in a different environment is usually a good way to find problems. I had indeed moved the renamed clang-cl.exe to a different directory, but when I move it back into its home directory and retry the build, I get the same errors. On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > Thanks for trying the self-host, it's

OK, fixed the problem with the intrin.h header that doesn't exist in previous versions of VS... -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: JIT.patch URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060126/7e55b0d0/attachment.ksh>

lvqcl wrote: > lvqcl wrote: > > > 1) in config.h FLAC__HAS_X86INTRIN macro is always defined and empty, > > even if x86intrin.h is not available. > > > > 2) sse_os is defined as 'yes' or 'no', but AM_CONDITIONAL tests it for 'true': > > The patch is attached. Please check it. Looks good. I need to do a little testing. > > 3)

Sorry in advance for the limited details. I have a build of a recent (Monday) llvm/clang which I have installed in the expected way in my environment but I am getting failures like this; In file included from <some directory>/lib/clang/stable/include/x86intrin.h:29: In file included from <some directory>/lib/clang/stable/include/immintrin.h:118: <some

It's not possible to use ia32/*.nasm code in 64-bit compiles. There's still no 64-bit asm code in FLAC. I'm not familiar with asm too, so I wrote SSE-accelerated code using intrinsics. This code uses two new preprocessor macros: FLAC__CPU_X86_64 (analogous to FLAC__CPU_IA32) and FLAC__HAS_X86INTRIN (analogous to FLAC__HAS_NASM) Patch for cpu.c/cpu.h adds CPU features (sse3, ssse3)

Given they in separate repos, is there a way to to verify which revisions go together? Is it enough that the clang (shortly) after llvm in time? On 2/5/19, 1:03 PM, "Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: Your clang and your llvm don't match, they're often version locked and you need to make sure both of them are the same-ish revision. -eric

On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Morten Ofstad wrote: > OK, fixed the problem with the intrin.h header that doesn't exist in previous > versions of VS... applied, thanks! http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20060123/031225.html -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Hi, I love llvm vectors, yet I wonder why some advanced vector operations are specific to some CPU targets? Let me take an example: /// Horizontally adds the adjacent pairs of values contained in two /// 128-bit vectors of [4 x float]. /// /// \headerfile <x86intrin.h> /// /// This intrinsic corresponds to the <c> VHADDPS </c> instruction. /// /// \param __a /// A