similar to: Online Backup failed....

Full output: root at iob-master:~# samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc01 --targetdir=/autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/$(hostname -d) -U administrator Password for [SAMBA\administrator]: INFO 2023-11-20 15:30:05,639 pid:73781 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/join.py #1614: workgroup is SAMBA INFO 2023-11-20 15:30:05,640 pid:73781 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/join.py #1617: realm

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:34:19 +0100 Dirk Laurenz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Full output: > > root at iob-master:~# samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc01 > --targetdir=/autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/$(hostname -d) -U > administrator Password for [SAMBA\administrator]: > INFO 2023-11-20 15:30:05,639 pid:73781 >

Hey, dir exisit.... root at dc01:/autofs/backup# ls -la /autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/backup.tgz/ insgesamt 12484 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:02 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:00 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12765535 20. Nov 14:03 samba-backup-samba.laurenz.ws-2023-11-20T14-02-51.306281.tar.bz2 drwx------ 2 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:00 tmpdz6serc_ drwx------ 7 root

Hi, here are the versions: dc01: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Rev 1.2 root at dc01:~# cat /etc/debian_version 11.8 root at dc01:~# samba -V Version 4.17.12-Debian root at dc01:~# uname -a Linux dc01 6.1.21-v8+ #1642 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 3 17:24:16 BST 2023 aarch64 GNU/Linux Dc02: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Rev 1.2 root at dc02:~# cat /etc/debian_version 11.8 root at dc02:~# samba -V Version

Hello List, now i try to use the backup command for the first time and it fails: It claims sam.ldb.d is not empty but there should be all domain db's right? Samba Version: root at dc01:/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d# <mailto:root at dc01:/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d#> samba -V Version 4.11.8-Debian root at dc01:/backup/linux/samba-dom# samba-tool domain backup

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 14:21:53 +0100 Dirk Laurenz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > > > i tried "samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc01 > --targetdir=/autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/backup.tgz -U > administrator" Does the /autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/backup.tgz directory actually exist ? To me it looks like a

Hello List, offline fails also.. root at dc01:~# samba-tool domain backup offline --targetdir=/backup/linux/samba-dom-dc01-offline Creating targetdir /backup/linux/samba-dom-dc01-offline... running backup on dirs: /var/lib/samba/private /var/lib/samba /etc/samba Starting transaction on /var/lib/samba/private/secrets Starting transaction on /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb backing up

This enables the ability to take the ovirt-node-image iso and deploy it to an iscsi disk. It also provides a sample pxe configuration for booting based on the iscsi root device. Includes support for user/password as well as reverse chap user/password. --- Makefile.am | 1 + livecd-iso-to-iscsi | 201 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ovirt-node-image.spec.in |

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:05:49 +0100 <samba at laurenz.ws> wrote: > Hey, > > dir exisit.... > > root at dc01:/autofs/backup# ls -la > /autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/backup.tgz/ insgesamt 12484 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:02 . > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:00 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12765535 20. Nov 14:03 >

Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso <noxdafox@gmail.com> --- python/t/test830RHBZ1406906.py | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) create mode 100644 python/t/test830RHBZ1406906.py diff --git a/python/t/test830RHBZ1406906.py b/python/t/test830RHBZ1406906.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..62caf8ce1 --- /dev/null +++

I've traced a memory leak to a statement which assigns the values from an MSetItem to a dictionary which is then appended to a list in python. We're running python 2.7.3, xapian-core 1.2.15 and xapian-bindings 1.2.15. I've provided an example which reproduces the behavior below. The example prints the PID and has a few statements waiting for input to make observing the behavior easier.

Hi Dirk. Ok, now im ready with the debian packages for 4.10, this could make your life more easy. I've not tested this but should work, you could try this. Install a debian 9 server as minimal as possible, so choose expert install, only install ssh server, nothing else. Now in this order, start building the armhf samba 4.10 packages This should be easy todo now since i've match the

--- scripts/install.py | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100755 scripts/install.py diff --git a/scripts/install.py b/scripts/install.py new file mode 100755 index 0000000..ddffb53 --- /dev/null +++ b/scripts/install.py @@ -0,0 +1,247 @@ +#!/usr/bin/python +# +# install.py - configure local boot/root disk

Verify the returned values of Python Object constructor functions are not NULL before adding them to a collection. This is particularly relevant when constructing Unicode strings in Python 3 as they will return NULL if non UTF-8 characters are present. Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso <noxdafox@gmail.com> --- generator/python.ml | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------

Verify the returned values of Python Object constructor functions are not NULL before adding them to a collection. This is particularly relevant when constructing Unicode strings in Python 3 as they will return NULL if non UTF-8 characters are present. Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso <noxdafox@gmail.com> --- generator/python.ml | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------

I have two domain controller servers, with samba in version 4.18 On both DCs both the Sysvol share and the subdirectories (including GPOs) have the same permission: getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/lib/samba/sysvol # file: usr/local/samba/var/lib/samba/sysvol # owner: root # group: 3000000 user::rwx user:root:rwx user:3000000:rwx user:3000001:r-x user:3000002:rwx user:3000003:r-x group::rwx

Patch 2 certainly allows you to set the thread model. However patch 3 shows that if you set it to nbdkit.THREAD_MODEL_PARALLEL it will crash. If you look closely at the stack trace (attached below) you can see that ignoring threads which are in parts of nbdkit unrelated to Python: Thread 4: In pread, waiting in time.sleep(). This thread has released the GIL. Thread 2: Started to

Hello, I was hoping to reprovision the same domain by specifying the domain GUID in the command line tool 'samba-tool domain provision' but I am not sure if I missed something or if there is a bug but the specified domain GUID is not the one which is created for my domain. Specifying the domain SID seems to work as I would expect. I tested it with Samba shipped by Debian 11 (samba2

Hi! I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on a DC and I got the following I pasted below. The first DC was provisioned migrating from a samba NT4 PDC with an LDAP backend using the classic upgrade procedure. I haven't detected any problem but I wanted to make sure there isn't any problem I might not be seeing yet. ERROR(<class

That's not a problem its just a ACL provisioning message as you can see the result was "DAG:DAD:PAI" but expected was "O:DAG:DAD:PAR" that's "normal" ;-) just ignore it or do a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" Am 19.10.23 um 17:27 schrieb bd730c5053df9efb via samba: > Hi! > > I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck"