Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "NetBSD on Xen 3.1 CentOS 5.2"
2008 Aug 05
3
NetBSD on CentOS 5.2 Xen 3
Please I need help installing NetBSD on CentOS 5.2 running Xen 3 is a amd64
bit.
IBM xSeries 346 146G HHD. I had installed Centos 5.2 on top of CentOS 5.2
now I need to install NetBSD
Please Help.
Thanks,
Augustin
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2008 Aug 05
3
NetBSD on CentOS 5.2 Xen 3
Please I need help installing NetBSD on CentOS 5.2 running Xen 3 is a amd64
bit.
IBM xSeries 346 146G HHD. I had installed Centos 5.2 on top of CentOS 5.2
now I need to install NetBSD
Please Help.
Thanks,
Augustin
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2008 Feb 29
1
error creating Centos 5.1 x32 dum_U instance on CentOS 5.1 x64
Hi all
This is the first time I try and get Xen working, and want to install a
few CentOS 5.1 32bit and FreeBSD 6.1 VM's on my CentOS 5.1 x64 server.
Trying to get the first one to install is rather trivial, and I keep on
running into errors. At fist I wanted to install it fro the cdrom, so I
used "virt-install --cdrom=/dev/hdc" It booted up, and I could choose my
language, but
2011 Aug 30
1
Why the data got from "top" and "xentop" are different?
Hi All,
I''m a beginner in Xen. Recently I''ve configured one VM (vm03) hosted in my
physical machine. I ran the "netperf" workload in the vm01, and used the
"top" command in the vm03 to test the behavior of the running workload.
Meanwhile, I also used the "xentop" command in domain0 to see the resource
consumption in vm03. Interestingly, I found that
2008 Feb 29
2
error creating Centos 5.1 x32 dum_U instance on CentOS5.1 x64
Nah, RHEL 5.1+ supports 32-bit domU (PAE and non PAE) on 64-bit dom0.
Actually RHEL Xen is 3.1 with the brain damaged 3.0 userland utilities.
-Ross
----- Original Message -----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org <centos-bounces at centos.org>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Sent: Fri Feb 29 04:46:42 2008
Subject: Re: [CentOS] error creating Centos 5.1 x32 dum_U
2008 Feb 29
2
error creating Centos 5.1 x32 dum_U instance on CentOS5.1 x64
Nah, RHEL 5.1+ supports 32-bit domU (PAE and non PAE) on 64-bit dom0.
Actually RHEL Xen is 3.1 with the brain damaged 3.0 userland utilities.
-Ross
----- Original Message -----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org <centos-bounces at centos.org>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Sent: Fri Feb 29 04:46:42 2008
Subject: Re: [CentOS] error creating Centos 5.1 x32 dum_U
2010 Dec 20
8
Mutiple virtualmachines Live migration at the same time with Xen
Dear all
The following process is about trying to do the " live migration at the same time with 5 Virtual machines ", but there is somthing problem with it.
Process:
yogi-pc2: # xm migrate --live vm01 pc2 & xm migrate --live vm02 pc2 & xm migrate --live vm03 pc2 & xm migrate --live vm04 pc2 & xm migrate --live vm05 pc2[1] 29983
[2] 29984
[3] 29985
[4]
2008 Aug 13
0
NetBSD, FreeBSD on Xen 3.1
Hi all,
please direct me to NetBSD install file or FreeBSD to install on Xen 3.1 on
(CentOS 5.2)
Thanks,
- Augustin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20080813/428a4792/attachment-0004.html>
2008 Aug 11
2
Need Kernel for NetBSD to install on Xen
Hello You All,
I'm trying to install NetBSD on Xen. Anyone, I need a kernel to install
NetBSD or FreeBSD or both to install it on Xen 3.2 running from CentOS 5.2
Thanks,
really appreciate some Help.
Thanks,
- Augustin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2008 Aug 07
1
Installing guest OS on Xen 3
WHen I try to install NetBSD this it what is get
xm create vm02 -c
Using config file "./vm02".
Error: HVM guest support is unavailable: is VT/AMD-V supported by your CPU
and enabled in your BIOS?
*
My vm02 file in
/etc/xen/vm02*
kernel="/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader"
builder='hvm'
name = "vm02"
#uuid = "177aedba-c62a-e7df-84c3-4c870b2cade4"
maxmem
2006 May 21
2
exception looking up device number for sda1
I just tried to setup another domain on a server running 1 domain. When i
try to start the domain it gives me an error
Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Backend device not found.
The entry in my xen config file for the disks is
disk =
[''phy:/dev/xen001/xen2-fun,sda1,w'',''phy:/dev/xen001/xen2-fun-swap,sda2,w'']
Looking at /var/log/xend.log, i found
2007 Jun 14
1
changing pae mode in security update?
Hi,
Did I get it right or is it a confusion in my mirrors, that the change
from linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-686 to linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686 also
changed the PAE mode of the Kernel?
After installing this new version and and changeing the kernel in a domU
config, I get:
Error: (2, 'Invalid kernel', 'xc_dom_compat_check: guest type
xen-3.0-x86_32p not supported by xen kernel,
2018 Mar 02
2
sieve vacation alias handling problem
Hi,
I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable.
The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve
responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified.
>From testing it seems that :addresses only adds addresses to the list of
"known" emails to check against. It is not limiting it.
As I understand, sieve should check if To: header
2004 Mar 15
2
'Invalid cross-device link' message on sparc
Hi,
I've got problems with a symlink to another device in a directory used
with '--link-dest'.
I've got something like
augustin@i90fs4:/tmp/rsync% ls -alR
.:
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 4 augustin augustin 4096 Mar 15 12:07 ./
drwxrwxrwt 4 root root 4096 Mar 15 10:56 ../
drwxr-xr-x 3 augustin augustin 4096 Mar 11 15:05 source/
drwxr-xr-x 2 augustin
2018 Mar 03
2
sieve vacation alias handling problem
On 2018-03-03 21:28, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Op 3/2/2018 om 3:35 PM schreef Karol Augustin:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable.
>>
>> The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve
>> responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified.
>>
>> From testing it seems that
2011 Oct 04
2
GSSAPI and deny=yes passdb
Hi. Is it possible to use GSSAPI authentication and deny passdb
together? Seems it doesn't work as I expect: GSSAPI doesn't check deny
passdb, so I'm not able to restrict access to GSSAPI-users.
I can see these in logs when user tries to connect with PLAIN
authentication (via pam_krb5):
Oct 4 11:14:31 vm03 auth: Debug: passwd-file(testuser,172.17.0.123):
lookup: user=testuser
2011 Feb 18
1
about: memory allocation and the balloon list
Dear all
I use the command( xm mem-set ID mem ) trying to understand the memory allocation between the Dom0 and the Guests(vm),
but there is still some confusion about this.
As the above /proc/xen/balloon list
I set xm mem-set Domain-0 128
and changing the vm memory from 256 to 128: xm mem-set vm01 128 (...from vm01 to vm08)
before mem-setCurrent allocation: 427792 kB
2015 Nov 24
2
libvirtd doesn't attach Sheepdog storage VDI disk correctly
Hi,
I am trying to use libvirt with sheepdog.
I am using Debian 8 stable with libvirt V1.21.0
I am encountering a Problem which already has been reported.
=================================================================
See here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/virt-tools/msg08363.html
=================================================================
qemu/libvirtd is not setting the path
2015 Nov 30
1
Re: libvirtd doesn't attach Sheepdog storage VDI disk correctly
Hi,
I tried two different approaches.
1.) Convert an existing Image with qemu-img
================================================
qemu-img convert -t directsync lubuntu-14.04.3-desktop-i386.iso
sheepdog:lubuntu1404.iso
=================================================
results in
====================================================
root@orion2:/var/lib/libvirt/xml# virsh vol-dumpxml --pool
2018 Feb 27
1
Quota status to postfix in distributed environment
Out of curiosity would it be possible to configure dovecot in such a way that if a message had been accepted by postfix because it couldn't check quota the message was delivered anyway, despite being over quota?
I'd much rather that then risk backscatter.
(I used to have quotas, but with the size of disks I've found it easier to simply have a "clue bat?approach and a reasonable