similar to: ACLs overriding umasks?

Hi. Firstly, my environment: FreeBSD isis.poly.edu 9.1-RC1 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0: Thu Sep 20 23:42:23 EDT 2012 boris@jails.isis.poly.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 qmail-tls-1.03.20021228_4 I have noticed that qmail-remote spins around using 100% CPU forever when delivering mail to a select few hosts. I believe this all to be in userspace as top reports that the CPU is busy with

Is there any way I can set different umasks for different users in the "homes" share? Any advice would be appreciated. Cheers, ---- Jeff Newton Unix Systems Administrator PMC-Sierra Inc.

I have quite a problem with the new SAMBA version(s) ( both 1.9.17 and 1.9.17 p2). When creating a directory in a samba-mounted unix file system the create mask entry will be ignored. I tried a lot (changing umasks on the unix boxes (SunOS/Solaris), changing the create mask entry to a many different values) but nothing happens at all. Every directory will be created with the permissions of 755.

Dovecot 2.2.9-1 accepts SETACL commands that share mailboxes to non-existent mailboxes. There is no error message. Is this intended behavior? I think it's bad because clients present a success message when indeed the intent of the user failed. Typos are hard to catch.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Boris wrote: > On Thursday 20 February 2014 20:45:32 Boris wrote: >> Dovecot 2.2.9-1 accepts SETACL commands that share mailboxes to non-existent >> mailboxes. There is no error message. Is this intended behavior? There is a "false friend" here. A "mailbox" in the tongue of many English

The FreeBSD ACL implementation is currently based on a late POSIX.1e draft, and is similar in functionality to the ACL support in Solaris, IRIX, and Linux. It was developed along a similar timeline to the Linux ACL support, and Andreas and I chatted a fair amount along the way so the parallels are strong -- in fact, the Samba ACL support is almost identical, and the ACL API man pages on

From: Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com> Commit f62805f1 introduced a bug where lazy MMU mode isn''t exited if a m2p_add/remove_override call fails. Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> Cc: Anthony

Hi, I have a question about file permissions and how they are affected by a client's umask. To illustrate my question, I issued the following commands first on a local ext3 file system and then on a cifs file system: $ umask 0002 $ touch f1 $ echo xx > f2 $ umask 0022 $ touch f3 $ echo xx > f4 $ ls -l On Ext3, the output is: -rw-rw-r-- 1 abdv29 users 0 Oct 9 00:31 f1 -rw-rw-r-- 1

Hello listmates, If I have a regular, ACL-capable filesystem on Linux (say, ext4 or xfs) is there a way for me to establish the following: 1) There is a directory, say, /home/joe . It is owned by user joe . No one but joe (and root, of course) can read or write anything in this directory. 2) No one can change permissions on that directory, not even joe. In other words, in joe all of a sudden

We currently set sb->s_flags |= MS_POSIXACL unconditionally, which is incorrect -- it tells the VFS that it shouldn''t set umask because we will, yet we don''t set it ourselves if we aren''t using POSIX ACLs, so the umask ends up ignored. Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

I have a situation where I need to share, via Samba, a filesystem mounted via NFSv4. I'm struggling with the best way to make Samba see the NFSv4 ACLs and enumerate them to provide the proper SMB/CIFS access to the files, instead of "Access Denied" errors that I currently get. Looking at the Samba source, the only obvious NFSv4 stuff appears to be the following: - zfsacl, available

I was able to get login prompt ( commit 7c62209cde5b13b81685e79b2f9e3757e293aef1 ) first time via serial console:- title Xen 3.4.1  Fedora 12 Serial (2.6.31-rc8 ) (/dev/sdb1)   root (hd1,0)   kernel /xen-3.4.1.gz dom0_mem=1024M loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all com1=19200,8n1 console=com1   module /vmlinuz-2.6.31-rc8 ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_fdr12-lv_root console=hvc0 earlyprintk=xen   module

root@boris-P5Q-E:/mnt/usr/tmp# losetup -f ubuntu11.04.iso root@boris-P5Q-E:/mnt/usr/tmp# losetup -a /dev/loop0: [0809]:406494 (/mnt/usr/tmp/ubuntu11.04.iso) root@boris-P5Q-E:~/vms/natty# cat natty.hvm name = "NattyHVM" builder = "hvm" memory = "2048" disk = [''phy:/dev/sda5,hda,w'', ''phy:/dev/loop0,hdc:cdrom,r''] vif = [

root@boris-P5Q-E:/mnt/usr/tmp# losetup -f ubuntu11.04.iso root@boris-P5Q-E:/mnt/usr/tmp# losetup -a /dev/loop0: [0809]:406494 (/mnt/usr/tmp/ubuntu11.04.iso) root@boris-P5Q-E:~/vms/natty# cat natty.hvm name = "NattyHVM" builder = "hvm" memory = "2048" disk = [''phy:/dev/sda5,hda,w'', ''phy:/dev/loop0,hdc:cdrom,r''] vif = [

Are you expecting improvement after  09/15/2009 new-swiotlb commits ? 4097,6144, "No_dom0_mem_specified" don''t look to me to have any. Boris.   _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Dear *, I''m more used to work with RedHat like OSes. Still, I did not denied the request from a user who wants a domU based on ubunto. I usually use virt-install to do the job, with a script similar to this one: #!/bin/sh BASE=SL-4.7-i386-pv \ virt-install --nographics \ --nonsparse \ --paravirt \ --noreboot \

Andy, OSOL 2009.06 been installed in stub domain (hvm domain) at mentioned Dom0 with 2.6.30 xenified kernel via xen-patches-2.6.30-2.tar.bz2 refuse to activate PV drivers. When same Dom0 starts with 2.6.29.4 xenified kernel (xen-patches-2.6.29-6.tar.bz2) kernel OSOL 2009.06 in stub (hvm) domain does activate PV drivers for xdf, xnf . Boris

hi there - is it possible to share a directory via samba and (kernel-)nfsv4 in parallel and make samba use (ie.: read, write and enforce) nfsv4 acls to implement winnt-acls? i know that using nfs3 and posix acls is working halfway okay, but couldn't find anything useful for nfsv4 and the associated acls - sorry if i missed something obvious. i played around with the nfs4acl_xattr and

# HG changeset patch # User Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@amd.com> # Date 1330642361 -3600 # Node ID 99df5c6b2964ceaa73651d7bc02fb1ae820f7691 # Parent a7bacdc5449a2f7bb9c35b2a1334b463fe9f29a9 x86: Use deep C states for off-lined CPUs Currently when a core is taken off-line it is placed in C1 state (unless MONITOR/MWAIT is used). This patch allows a core to go to deeper C states

> On Dec 3, 2015, at 17:24, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:54:21PM -0700, Nick Couchman wrote: >> I have a situation where I need to share, via Samba, a filesystem mounted via NFSv4. I'm struggling with the best way to make Samba see the NFSv4 ACLs and enumerate them to provide the proper SMB/CIFS access to the files, instead