Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[Bug 424] scp mishandles files with spaces in names"
2003 Jan 03
0
[Bug 424] scp mishandles files with spaces in names
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424
djm at mindrot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-01-03 15:16
2002 Nov 01
0
[Bug 424] New: scp mishandles files with spaces in names
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424
Summary: scp mishandles files with spaces in names
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: older versions
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: scp
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
2019 Nov 04
2
scp, sftp, and special characters in filenames
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, David Newall wrote:
> On 4/11/19 3:29 am, Demi M. Obenour wrote:
> > I have not been able to get scp(1) to download a file with a newline
> > in its name. I know that scp(1) requires that remote filenames be
> > escaped for the shell, but that leads to protocol errors.
>
> I see something much worse:
>
> $ sudo sh
> # echo
2002 Mar 14
1
SCP or RCP standards
Hi All,
I am looking for SCP or RCP standards. I searched on the web but I am not
able to find the standards. Please mail me the link where I can find the
standards for SCP or RCP.
Thanks,
Abhijeet
2003 Feb 06
0
[Bug 485] New: scp doesn't preserve symbolic links
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485
Summary: scp doesn't preserve symbolic links
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: scp
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: jsk29
2020 Jul 15
3
Deprecation of scp protocol and improving sftp client
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Red Cricket wrote:
> I have had this in my .bashrc for years:
>
> alias scp='rsync -avzP'
Similar, though I named it rcp because nobody has the real rcp installed
any more, but sometimes I need scp to connect to systems that lack rsync.
https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=shellsnippets/shellsnippets.git;a=blob;f=mksh/rcp;hb=HEAD
>
2004 Dec 08
1
dangerous behaviour of scp
When you require a scp copy of more than 1 file to a destination that is
not a directory, scp copy the last input file to the destination
(version openssh-3.8.1p1).
Thus if you forget to specify the destination, the last file is
_silently destroyed_.
I know that rcp exhibits the same behaviour but cp and rsync don't do
anything in that case and _kindly_ warn you that you made a mistake:
2003 Jun 04
8
[Bug 485] scp doesn't preserve symbolic links
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485
djm at mindrot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-06-04 23:28
2020 Aug 01
2
Deprecation of scp protocol and improving sftp client
Why can the local and remote paths be sanitized?
Regards,
Uri
> On Jul 31, 2020, at 19:57, Ethan Rahn <ethan.rahn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ?I wanted to bring this up again due to:
> https://github.com/cpandya2909/CVE-2020-15778/. This showcases a clear
> issue with scp which it sounds like cannot be fixed without breaking scp.
> This seems like it would lend some impetus
2006 Oct 27
2
resolving difference in interface between rsync and cp/rcp/scp
I've run into a situation where we'd like to replace rcp with rsync, but
we've run into a difference in interface, which is causing us problems.
Here's the problem. If we run this in rsync:
> mkdir tmpdir; cd tmpdir
> mkdir a; touch a/b
> rsync -r a b/
> ls b
a/
But for all the other programs, we get something different:
> cp -r a c/
> ls c
foo
> cp
2004 Feb 10
0
[Bug 619] scp permissions
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619
djm at mindrot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2004-02-10 13:37
2024 Sep 27
0
Bug: ssh-copy-id mishandles dropbear
Hello,
ssh-copy-id has special handling for dropbear, but this seems to be
quite out of date (or forever wrong).
I dont see dropbear ever accessing `/etc/dropbear/authorized_keys`,
and I don't see any hints this ever was the case.
dropbear uses ~/.ssh/authorized_keys just like OpenSSH, so the special
handling needs to go.
regards, Norbert
2024 Sep 29
1
Bug: ssh-copy-id mishandles dropbear
Am So., 29. Sept. 2024 um 00:20 Uhr schrieb <piticu.pulii at gmail.com>:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 04:35:22PM +0200, Norbert Lange wrote:
> > ssh-copy-id has special handling for dropbear, but this seems to be
> > quite out of date (or forever wrong).
> > I dont see dropbear ever accessing `/etc/dropbear/authorized_keys`,
> > and I don't see any hints this
2004 Feb 26
12
[Bug 801] Improve usability of scp by adding a "make path" option
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=801
Summary: Improve usability of scp by adding a "make path" option
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: scp
AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org
2007 May 17
2
[Bug 828] date overflow with scp -p
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828
Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #588| |ok+
Flag| |
--- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org>
2007 Jul 09
12
[Bug 1337] New: SCP performance twice as slow as RCP
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1337
Summary: SCP performance twice as slow as RCP
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 3.8.1p1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: AIX
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: scp
AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org
ReportedBy:
2020 Aug 03
6
Deprecation of scp protocol and improving sftp client
I conjecture that only few of the existing use cases rely on remote expansion.
In any case (no pun intended), IMHO it would be better to break a few of the current use cases but leave the majority functional - than kill scp for all.
Regards,
Uri
> On Aug 3, 2020, at 02:50, Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> ?On Sat, 2020-08-01 at 00:17 +0000, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553
2019 Nov 04
4
scp, sftp, and special characters in filenames
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 14:07, David Newall <openssh at davidnewall.com> wrote:
> [about scp] That's just awful, and I should have
> thought it was not at all necessary. Am I missing something?
>
If you're saying that the scp protocol is an unfixable mess then the
openssh team has been agreeing[0] with you for at least a decade and a
half. We fix what we can, but some
2013 Jan 03
0
[Bug 1998] Arbitrary command execution using SCP
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998
Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |djm at mindrot.org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
2006 Jul 03
2
[Bug 1205] scp back-slash escaping of spaces ignored after username@hostname: tag
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1205
Summary: scp back-slash escaping of spaces ignored after
username at hostname: tag
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.3p2
Platform: ix86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: low-hanging-fruit
Severity: normal
Priority: P3