similar to: samba-tool dns zoneoptions --mark-old-records-static

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "samba-tool dns zoneoptions --mark-old-records-static"

2023 Nov 08
1
samba-tool dns zoneoptions --mark-old-records-static
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:18:12 +0100 Sam R via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to use this command to convert my old servers dns records > to static but I'm running into a few problems: > > The following command does not work : > > *samba-tool dns zoneoptions > --mark-old-records-static="2021-03-30"Usage:
2023 Nov 08
1
samba-tool dns zoneoptions --mark-old-records-static
@Wilfred : Thank for that good tip but when I test this command I get ; Usage: samba-tool dns zoneoptions <server> <zone> [options] @Rowland : Yes server1 is one of my 2 DC and example.com my domain and first DNS zone ( of course I change the name here ) Regards Samuel Le mer. 8 nov. 2023 ? 16:49, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On Wed, 8
2023 Nov 08
2
samba-tool dns zoneoptions --mark-old-records-static
Sorry for the 'CC', here is the result : search error - LDAP error 32 LDAP_NO_SUCH_OBJECT - <acl_read: Error retrieving instanceType for base. at ../../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl_read.c:967> <> Samuel Le mer. 8 nov. 2023 ? 17:06, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:58:23 +0100 > Sam R <sr42354 at
2023 Nov 08
1
samba-tool dns zoneoptions --mark-old-records-static
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:58:23 +0100 Sam R <sr42354 at gmail.com> wrote: > @Wilfred : Thank for that good tip but when I test this command I get > ; Usage: samba-tool dns zoneoptions <server> <zone> [options] > > @Rowland : Yes server1 is one of my 2 DC and example.com my domain and > first DNS zone ( of course I change the name here ) > OK, if you run this
2023 Nov 08
1
samba-tool dns zoneoptions --mark-old-records-static
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 17:11:45 +0100 Sam R via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Sorry for the 'CC', here is the result : > search error - LDAP error 32 LDAP_NO_SUCH_OBJECT - <acl_read: Error > retrieving instanceType for base. at > ../../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl_read.c:967> <> > > When I run it, I get every machine in the AD forward
2023 Nov 08
1
samba-tool dns zoneoptions --mark-old-records-static
Yes Le mer. 8 nov. 2023 ? 17:22, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 17:11:45 +0100 > Sam R via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Sorry for the 'CC', here is the result : > > search error - LDAP error 32 LDAP_NO_SUCH_OBJECT - <acl_read: Error > > retrieving instanceType for base. at >
2023 Nov 08
1
samba-tool dns zoneoptions --mark-old-records-static
In short, I have my dns records in : CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=ariane,DC=intra and I have root dns in : CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=ariane,DC=intra but I don't have a "MicrosoftDNS" entry in DC=ariane,DC=intra Samuel Le mer. 8 nov. 2023 ? 17:27, Sam R <sr42354 at gmail.com> a ?crit : > Yes > > Le mer. 8 nov. 2023 ? 17:22, Rowland Penny via
2023 Nov 08
1
samba-tool dns zoneoptions --mark-old-records-static
But this one return a lot of objects : sudo ldbsearch -H ldap://server1 -P -b"DC=example.com,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=exemple,DC=com" -s sub '(&(objectClass=dnsNode)(!(dNSTombstoned=TRUE)))' dnsRecord name @Wilfred : Sorry I fogot an argument, but if I ajust the command I have the same answer than with --mark-old-records-static=2021-03-30 Samuel Le mer. 8 nov.
2012 Jul 23
1
[PATCH] nsd-patch: fix segfault after renaming slave zone
Hi all, we have discovered a segfault in nsd-patch when renaming slave zone in nsd config file if some data for this zone still exists in the IXFR diff database. In my case, the zone "black" was renamed to "blackinwhite": > root at ggd115:/cage/nsd/var/nsd/zones#nsd-patch -c > /cage/nsd/etc/nsd-dns-slave.conf > reading database > reading updates to database >
2016 Sep 28
2
ad2003 schema while forest/domain at 2008R2 level
Hi everyone, I came across this issue today while upgrading a samba4 AD. The forest/domain level is 2008R2, however the schema partition is actually missing the msDS-isRODC attribute (and probably a few others). It makes the ADUC console to failed on that entry below. Here is the samba log message (which is quite explicit :-) Sep 28 16:55:36 srvads samba[27900]: [2016/09/28 16:55:36.819666,
2013 Apr 22
1
New Windows 8 RSAT and "OU=Domain Controllers" support?
Hello, We have two DCs. One runs Windows 2003 R2, and the other Samba 4.0.5. Forest functional level is Windows 2000 native. I recently demoted (worked flawlessy now, which was a great relief), rebuilt and re-promoted my Samba 4 DC, as my problems that I posted to this list about two monts were still unresolved (see https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-February/171898.html), and I thoght
2013 Jan 10
2
Samba 4 "Services for UNIX"? [SOLVED]
To get the automount schema to work with the git checkout of samba 4 I had to modify the automount schema files and separate the attributes from the classes. I also discovered that it's required to have the ntSecurityDescriptor , instanceType, and objectCategory attributes. Without these it will crash whenever you try to browse... I did alot of stopping samba, tarring of /usr/local/samba and
2015 May 21
2
second DC behavior when first switched off
Hello all, I'm always trying to migrate from W2000 server to Samba 4. For doing this, I tried this : - install a W2003 server with AD and DNS services, join it to W2000, transfer roles and after demote the old W2000 -> done - install a Sernet Samba4 with Bind9, join W2003, transfer all 7 roles -> done ( thanks to Rowland ) the sync process is working well in two way, I can manage
2015 Aug 13
2
Samba 4 schema upgrade.
Hello, We achieved our Domain Migration from Windows 2003 R2 server to Samba 4.2.3 (sernet binaries). Now Samba 4 is the only domain controller. When we use ADUC and click on Domain Controllers we have an error. At the same time if we have a look at de syslog messages on the server, we can see "ldb: acl_read: CN=SERVER,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=DOMAIN,DC=com cannot find attr[msDS-isRODC] in
2024 Jul 18
1
dbcheck gets uncaught exception
> Do not touch 'DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=COMPANY,DC=INTRA.ldb' (or any of the > other files in the same directory) directly, do all changes through > sam.ldb, otherwise you have a very good risk of further damaging your > database. I'm not sure if the dup keys in the 'DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=COMPANY,DC=INTRA.ldb' is my root issue and why the dbcheck fails with that
2021 Aug 26
0
[Announce] Samba 4.15.0rc3 Available for Download
Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.15.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects
2021 Aug 26
0
[Announce] Samba 4.15.0rc3 Available for Download
Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.15.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects
2011 Sep 11
15
How To Expand an .erb Template Without Doing a Full Puppet Run?
We use puppet to distribute named zone files, like many of you do. We use git to maintain these files, which are then pulled by the puppet master machine. These zone files are actually puppet template .erb files. The other day, I made a mistake which resulted in some zone files with syntax errors in them. Puppet faithfully distributed the erroneous zone files to the name servers, which killed
2019 May 22
2
dsdb_access Access check failed on CN=Configuration
Poking around on this further, I believe the LMHOSTS error does not matter. The smb directive "name resolve order" defaults to "lmhosts wins host bcast" -- so I believe the file no found error is just because it's trying lmhosts first, not finding the file and then moving on. Eventually it hits "host" resolution and uses /etc/hosts to resolve the name. Changing
2019 May 22
2
dsdb_access Access check failed on CN=Configuration
----- On May 22, 2019, at 11:07 AM, samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > On 22/05/2019 16:29, Mike Ray via samba wrote: >> ----- On May 22, 2019, at 10:01 AM, samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: >> >>> Try again with : >>> >>> samba-tool ldapcmp dc5.$(hostname -d) dc3.$(hostname -d) DNSFOREST >>> As in dc5.your.dns.domain.tld ...