similar to: [RFC v1 0/8] vhost-vdpa: add support for iommufd

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[RFC v1 0/8] vhost-vdpa: add support for iommufd"

2023 Nov 07
0
[RFC v1 0/8] vhost-vdpa: add support for iommufd
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 11:48:48AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 09:55:26AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:49:02AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > IMHO, this patch series needs to spend more time internally to Red Hat > > > before it is presented to the community. > > > > Just to add an example
2023 Nov 07
0
[RFC v1 0/8] vhost-vdpa: add support for iommufd
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:49:02AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:30:34AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 01:16:33AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote: > > > > > > Hi All > > > This code provides the iommufd support for vdpa device > > > This code fixes the bugs from the last version and also add the asid
2023 Nov 07
0
[RFC v1 0/8] vhost-vdpa: add support for iommufd
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 01:16:33AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote: > > Hi All > This code provides the iommufd support for vdpa device > This code fixes the bugs from the last version and also add the asid support. rebase on kernel > v6,6-rc3 > Test passed in the physical device (vp_vdpa), but there are still some problems in the emulated device (vdpa_sim_net), What kind of problems?
2023 Nov 07
0
[RFC v1 0/8] vhost-vdpa: add support for iommufd
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:49:02AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > IMHO, this patch series needs to spend more time internally to Red Hat > before it is presented to the community. Just to add an example why I think this "internal review" is a bad idea I seem to recall that someone internal to nvidia at some point attempted to implement this already. The only output from that work
2023 Nov 07
0
[RFC v1 0/8] vhost-vdpa: add support for iommufd
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 01:16:33AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote: > Test passed in the physical device (vp_vdpa), but there are still some problems in the emulated device (vdpa_sim_net), I'm not sure there's even value in bothering with iommufd for the simulator. Just find a way to disable it and fail gracefully. -- MST
2007 Jun 01
0
OT: "The Ignorance of Crowds" (was: OT Slightly: )
I see what Dean means about how Digium/Asterisk might have struck a balance between "the cathedral and the bazaar" antipodes of the SW development world. Nicholas Carr's "The Ignorance of Crowds" finally states his "politics" when it says "When you move from the bazaar to the cathedral, it?s best to leave your democratic ideals behind." But treating
2023 Feb 20
1
[PATCH v2] vhost/vdpa: Add MSI translation tables to iommu for software-managed MSI
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 8:43 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 05:12:29AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:14:50PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 08:08:43PM +0800, Nanyong Sun wrote: > > > > From: Rong Wang <wangrong68 at huawei.com> > > > >
2023 Feb 17
1
[PATCH v2] vhost/vdpa: Add MSI translation tables to iommu for software-managed MSI
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 8:15 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 08:08:43PM +0800, Nanyong Sun wrote: > > From: Rong Wang <wangrong68 at huawei.com> > > > > Once enable iommu domain for one device, the MSI > > translation tables have to be there for software-managed MSI. > > Otherwise, platform with
2023 Feb 17
1
[PATCH v2] vhost/vdpa: Add MSI translation tables to iommu for software-managed MSI
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 01:35:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 8:15 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 08:08:43PM +0800, Nanyong Sun wrote: > > > From: Rong Wang <wangrong68 at huawei.com> > > > > > > Once enable iommu domain for one device, the MSI > > > translation
2023 Nov 07
1
[PATCH v2 0/6] IOMMUFD: Deliver IO page faults to user space
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca> > Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 8:48 PM > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:49:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > This series implements the functionality of delivering IO page faults to > > user space through the IOMMUFD framework for nested translation. > Nested > > translation is a hardware
2023 Jan 06
8
[PATCH 0/8] Let iommufd charge IOPTE allocations to the memory cgroup
iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first
2023 Jan 06
8
[PATCH 0/8] Let iommufd charge IOPTE allocations to the memory cgroup
iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first
2023 Jan 06
8
[PATCH 0/8] Let iommufd charge IOPTE allocations to the memory cgroup
iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first
2023 Jan 18
10
[PATCH v2 00/10] Let iommufd charge IOPTE allocations to the memory cgroup
iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first
2020 Feb 14
0
[PATCH V2 3/5] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus
On 2020/2/14 ??12:24, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:56:00AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:51:54AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>>> That bus is exactly what Greg KH proposed. There are other ways >>>> to solve this I guess but this bikeshedding is getting tiring. >>> This discussion was for a
2023 Jan 23
11
[PATCH v3 00/10] Let iommufd charge IOPTE allocations to the memory cgroup
iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first
2023 Jan 23
11
[PATCH v3 00/10] Let iommufd charge IOPTE allocations to the memory cgroup
iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first
2004 Aug 06
3
[Re: icecast2 ??]
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Adon Irani wrote: | woah do0d . that's a crackp0t theory if i ever heard one ., | | i'll offer an alternate theory . KiSS - keEp it simple sir ; why should | the icecast2 developers be guilt-tripped into repeating icecast's | performance ? Icecast2 is icecast2. I'm talking about it's lack of innovation (ogg streaming! woopdefuckingdoo) as well as
2020 Feb 13
0
[PATCH V2 3/5] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:05:42AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:58:44PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 2020/2/13 ??9:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:34:10AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > You have dev, type or > > > > > class to choose from. Type is rarely
2020 Feb 14
0
[PATCH V2 3/5] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus
On 2020/2/13 ??11:05, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:58:44PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/2/13 ??9:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:34:10AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>> >>>>> You have dev, type or >>>>> class to choose from. Type is rarely used and doesn't seem to be used