Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Concordance and Kendall's tau in copula"
2006 May 12
3
Maximum likelihood estimate of bivariate vonmises-weibulldistribution
Thanks Dimitris!!! That's much clearer now. Still have a lot of work to
do this weekend to understand every bit but your code will prove very
useful.
Cheers,
Aziz
-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitrios Rizopoulos [mailto:Dimitris.Rizopoulos at med.kuleuven.be]
Sent: May 12, 2006 4:35 PM
To: Chaouch, Aziz
Subject: RE: [R] Maximum likelihood estimate of bivariate
2003 Apr 07
1
kendall's tau-b computation (PR#2742)
Full_Name: Dan Field
Version: 1.6.2
OS: N/A
Submission from: (NULL) (209.115.168.187)
In kendall.c (library is ctest), the limits for the first loop in routine
kendall_tau run from 0 through n-1, and the inner loop runs from 0 through i-1.
This causes the each pair at index i to be compared with itself; my
understanding is that there should only be n*(n-1)/2 pairs under consideration
for
2008 Apr 22
1
Comparing kendall's tau values?
I have 3 variables relating to the successful introductions of species
to 95 different areas: introduction frequency; number of successes pre
1906; number of successes post 1906
The data are not normal, nor homo-skedatic, so I am using non-parametric
statistics.
I have calculated Kendall's tau between both introduction & successes
pre 1906 (tau=0.3903) and introduction & successes
2011 Apr 30
1
Kendall's tau code
I discovered that the Kendall's tau calculation in R uses all pairwise comparisons which is O(n^2) and takes a long time for large vectors. I implemented a O(n*log(n)) algorithm based on merge-sort. Is this of interest to be included in core R? The code (fortran and R wrapper) is available in my package clinfun v0.9.7 (not exported in NAMESPACE).
Thanks,
Venkat
--
Venkatraman E. Seshan,
2006 Sep 12
1
Kendall's tau-c
Hello,
I can't find a package which calculates Kendall's tau-c. There is the
package Kendall, but it only calcuates Kendall's tau-b.
Here is the example from
ttp://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/assocordinal.htm.
cityriots <- data.frame(citysize=c(1,1,2,2,3,3),
riotsize=c(1,2,1,2,1,2), weight=c(4,2,2,3,0,4))
cityriots <- data.frame(lapply(cityriots,function(x)
2005 Jun 28
1
faster algorithm for Kendall's tau
Hi,
I need to calculate Kendall's tau for large data
vectors (length > 100'000).
Is somebody aware of a faster algorithm or package
function than "cor(, method="kendall")"?
There are ties in the data to be considered (Kendall's
tau-b).
Any suggestions?
Regards
Ferdinand
2012 Jun 25
2
Fast Kendall's Tau
Hello.
Has any further action been taken regarding implementing David Simcha's fast Kendall tau code (now found in the package pcaPP as cor.fk) into R-base? It is literally hundreds of times faster, although I am uncertain as to whether he wrote code for testing the significance of the parameter. The last mention I have seen of this was in 2010
2010 Feb 08
2
Incorrect Kendall's tau for ordered variables (PR#14207)
Full_Name: Marek Ancukiewicz
Version: 2.10.1
OS: Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (74.0.49.2)
Both cor() and cor.test() incorrectly handle ordered variables with
method="kendall", cor() incorrectly handles ordered variables for
method="spearman" (method="person" always works correctly, while
method="spearman" works for cor.test, but not for cor()).
In
2002 Apr 25
3
Kendall's tau
A search of the archives did not reveal an answer:
For basic tests of association, where one has no a priori knowledge of the
form of the relation or of the distributions of the variables, rank
correlation seems like a good start. Why is cor.test() with Kendall and
Spearman options relegated to the ctest package, rather than in the base
package? Does this suggest that the developers consider
2010 Jun 09
0
fitting t copula
Hi r-users,
I try to fit the t copula using the gamma marginals. But I got error message which I don't really understand.
Thank you for any help given.
myCop.t <- ellipCopula(family = "t", dim = 2, dispstr = "toep", param = 0.5, df = 8)
myCop.t
myMvd <- mvdc(copula = myCop.t, margins = c("gamma", "gamma"), paramMargins = list(list(mean = 0, sd
2008 Jul 30
2
Sampling two exponentials
Hi all,
I am going to sample two variables from two exponential distributions, but I want to specify a covariance structure between these two variables. Is there any way to do it in R? Or is there a "Multivariate Exponential" thing corresponding to the multivariate normal? Thanks in advance.
Sincerely,
Yanwei Zhang
Department of Actuarial Research and Modeling
Munich Re America
Tel:
2017 Aug 06
1
Help with optim function in R, please?
Hi all,
Many thank in advance for helping me.? I tried to fit Expectation Maximization algorithm for mixture data. I must used one of numerical method to maximize my function.
I built my code but I do not know how to make the optim function run over a different value of the parameters.? That is,
For E-step I need to get the value of mixture weights based on the current (initial) values of
2009 Dec 13
2
O(N log N) Kendall Tau
I've noticed that the implementation of Kendall's Tau in R is O(N^2).
The following reference describes how it can be done in O(N log N):
A Computer Method for Calculating Kendall's Tau with Ungrouped Data
William R. Knight
Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 61, No. 314, Part
1 (Jun., 1966), pp. 436-439
http://www.jstor.org/pss/2282833
I'm interested in
2005 Aug 13
1
R/S-Plus/SAS yield different results for Kendall-tau and Spearman nonparametric regression
Colleagues,
I ran some nonparametric regressions in R (run in RedHat Linux), then
a colleague repeated the analyses in SAS. When we obtained different
results, I tested S-Plus (same Linux box). And, got yet different
results. I replicated the results with a small dataset:
DATA:
37.5
23
37.5
13
25
16
25
12
100
15
12.5
19
50
20
100
13
100
10
100
10
100
16
50
10
87.5
2013 Apr 22
0
Copula fitMdvc:
Hello,
I am trying to do a fit a loglikelihood function with Multivariate
distribution via copulas with fitMdvc. The problem is that it
doesn't recognize that my beta is a vector of km parameter and when I try
to run it it say that the length of my initial values is not the same as
the parameter.
Can somebody guide me where my mistake is.
Thanks,
Elisa.
#################################
2005 Aug 18
2
kendall tau correlation test for ties: Potential error (PR#8076)
Full_Name: Dirk Koschuetzki
Version: 2.1.1
OS: source code
Submission from: (NULL) (194.94.136.34)
Hello,
>From the source code (R-2.1.1, file: .../R-2.1.1/src/library/stats/R/)
******************************
cor.test.default <-
function(x, y, alternative = c("two.sided", "less", "greater"),
method = c("pearson", "kendall",
2011 Dec 09
1
Goodness of Fit for Copula
Dear All,
I'm now working on Archimedean copulas and try to test the goodness of fit.
Which packages I should use?
I have Clayton copula with parameter (5.35) and Frank (19.5).
I found this build function wrote by Yan and Ivan via R Packages, but I'm
not sure the matrix for x? Please advice.
e.g
gofCopula(claytonCopula(1),x)
Thank you
Regards,
Fayyad
[[alternative HTML version
2006 Oct 08
2
Generating bivariate or multivariate data with known parameter values
Greetings,
I'm interested in generating data from various bivariate or
mulitivariate distributions (e.g. gamma, t, etc), where I can specify
the parameter values, including the correlations among the variables. I
haven't been able to dig anything up on the faq, but I probably missed
something. A nudge in the right direction would be appreciated.
David
--
2012 Jan 04
1
Extract concordance from coxph.object
Dear all,
As I said in my previous email I have just upgraded to R 2.14.0 on Windows 7. I have just run the 'coxph' function and notice that a Concordance statistic is produced. Is there any way to extract this information from the output?
E.g. can I call the concordance value independently of calling the output?
Many thanks,
Laura
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2017 Aug 03
1
test for proportion or concordance
Hello group,
my question is deciding what test would be appropriate for following question.
An experiment 'A' yielded 3200 observations of which 431 are
significant. Similarly, using same method, another experiment 'B' on a
different population yielded 2541 observations of which 260 are
significant.
There are 180 observations that are common between significant
observations of A